Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print
Whitehouse Correspondents' Dinner Shooting? (Read 1802 times)
waggawoody
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3438
Wagga Wagga
Re: Whitehouse Correspondents' Dinner Shooting?
Reply #75 - May 1st, 2026 at 6:01pm
 
Another "Trump Shooting" False Flag?


To build a ballroom? Or escalate a war?


by Kevin Barrett


Donald Trump just keeps on getting shot at. Fortunately for him, if not for the rest of us, the people shooting at him are stunningly incompetent. For some reason, competent shooters always shoot at people causing problems for Israel, like the Kennedys and Charlie Kirk, while the doofuses shooting at Trump couldn’t hit the broad side of an ear. And if by some fluke they do hit the broad side of Trump’s ear with an AR-15 bullet, the bullet itself turns out to be incompetent. Actually, an AR-15 bullet that hits a human ear without leaving any visible sign of damage is worse than incompetent. As Trump would undoubtedly say to such a bullet, had he hired it during his days at The Apprentice: “You’re fired!”...

Oddly, the latest fake Trump shooting happened just days after mainstream media suddenly felt compelled to take note of the fact that hardly anybody, even in Trump’s MAGA base, still believes that Trump’s ear was struck by an AR-15 bullet in Butler, Pennsylvania on July 13, 2024. Last week Wired magazine informed us that “MAGA Is Increasingly Convinced the Trump Assassination Attempt Was Staged” and The New Republic echoed “MAGA Increasingly Believes Trump Assassination Attempt Was Fake,” while CNN offered a mind-bogglingly lame debunking: “How would an assassination attempt be ‘staged’?” and MS NOW ‘splained away “Why MAGA has developed conspiracy theories about the assassination attempt on Trump.”

A paranoid conspiracy theorist who imagined that conspirators cover up their unraveling conspiracies by staging even more preposterous, instantly-unraveling conspiracies might be forgiven for wondering whether the latest blatantly-fake “Trump shooting” was staged to distract us from the unraveling of the earlier, equally-blatantly-fake “Trump shooting.” The coverup team, our conspiracy theorist suspects, must be cackling gleefully: “Bwa-ha-ha! They’ve all completely forgotten about Trump’s perfectly intact ear, and how those Secret Service guys let him stand right up and do that fist-shaking photo op in front of the flag, exposing himself to more potential shots, had anyone been actually shooting at him…Now all they’re talking about is Leavitt’s prediction and Fox News cutting off Aminah Hasine and how fake and gay THIS ‘Trump shooting’ is!”...

The Thanksgiving false flag’s purpose was obvious (anti-immigration). The Butler ear-nick’s was even more obvious (anoint and elect Trump to obey Israel’s orders to attack Iran). But last night’s shooting at the Washington Hilton, unlike its earlier analogues, did not wear its purpose on its sleeve. Was it meant to demonize award-winning teachers or computer scientists or game developers? Probably not. Was it intended to demonstrate the need for a secure White House ballroom? That is one theory making the rounds on social media...

The theory that Trump’s people would use a false flag to get a ballroom built sounds farfetched. But as Wikipedia tells us, “The project's above-ground construction has faced legal challenges, with construction as of April 18 being allowed to continue until June 2026.” Opponents of the project have called it sickeningly tacky, ostentatious, typically-Trumpian tasteless fiasco that defecates all over the historical integrity of the White House. The National Trust for Historic Preservation has sued to stop the project, while “the Trump administration replied that the ballroom construction must continue for classified reasons of national security that may be shared with the judge but not with the plaintiffs.”

Just as Trump’s anti-immigration agenda had faced legal as well as political challenges that miraculously evaporated in the wake of the Thanksgiving shooting, so too his ballroom project has probably gone from “possibly obstructed” to “a done deal” thanks to last night’s false flag. So maybe those crazy conspiracy theorists aren’t so crazy. “There’s no way they staged this poo just so he can justify building a ballroom LMFAOOOOOOOOOOO.” (1.5 million views.)

Then again, all that ballroom-building blather could be a smokescreen for a deeper and more nefarious plan: Intimidate Trump into escalating the war on Iran. That would explain three strange, Israel-linked aspects of the shooting: the patsy’s social media profile featuring a picture of him wearing an IDF sweatshirt; the patsy’s name being allegedly researched in Israel less than 24 hours before the attack; and the shooting erupting at the exact moment that an Israeli magician was terrifying Melania by exposing private information she had thought was secret. Taken together, those three odd Israeli connections to the event could easily be read as a message: “We know your Epstein secrets, we are the magicians creating these and other tricks, and we can get to you any time we like…so follow orders or else.”

Israel has every reason to try to force Trump to accept the disastrous political price he is paying for this misbegotten war, by threatening him with even worse consequences if he seeks an off-ramp...



Full report with sources/links:

https://kevinbarrett.substack.com/p/another-trump-shooting-false-flag
Back to top
 

Hamas, to my great regret, is Israel’s creation

Avner Cohen, former Israeli official, Wall Street Journal, 2009
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58047
Gender: male
Re: Whitehouse Correspondents' Dinner Shooting?
Reply #76 - May 2nd, 2026 at 8:22am
 
waggawoody wrote on May 1st, 2026 at 6:01pm:
Another "Trump Shooting" False Flag?


To build a ballroom? Or escalate a war?


by Kevin Barrett


Donald Trump just keeps on getting shot at. Fortunately for him, if not for the rest of us, the people shooting at him are stunningly incompetent. For some reason, competent shooters always shoot at people causing problems for Israel, like the Kennedys and Charlie Kirk, while the doofuses shooting at Trump couldn’t hit the broad side of an ear. And if by some fluke they do hit the broad side of Trump’s ear with an AR-15 bullet, the bullet itself turns out to be incompetent. Actually, an AR-15 bullet that hits a human ear without leaving any visible sign of damage is worse than incompetent. As Trump would undoubtedly say to such a bullet, had he hired it during his days at The Apprentice: “You’re fired!”...

Oddly, the latest fake Trump shooting happened just days after mainstream media suddenly felt compelled to take note of the fact that hardly anybody, even in Trump’s MAGA base, still believes that Trump’s ear was struck by an AR-15 bullet in Butler, Pennsylvania on July 13, 2024. Last week Wired magazine informed us that “MAGA Is Increasingly Convinced the Trump Assassination Attempt Was Staged” and The New Republic echoed “MAGA Increasingly Believes Trump Assassination Attempt Was Fake,” while CNN offered a mind-bogglingly lame debunking: “How would an assassination attempt be ‘staged’?” and MS NOW ‘splained away “Why MAGA has developed conspiracy theories about the assassination attempt on Trump.”

A paranoid conspiracy theorist who imagined that conspirators cover up their unraveling conspiracies by staging even more preposterous, instantly-unraveling conspiracies might be forgiven for wondering whether the latest blatantly-fake “Trump shooting” was staged to distract us from the unraveling of the earlier, equally-blatantly-fake “Trump shooting.” The coverup team, our conspiracy theorist suspects, must be cackling gleefully: “Bwa-ha-ha! They’ve all completely forgotten about Trump’s perfectly intact ear, and how those Secret Service guys let him stand right up and do that fist-shaking photo op in front of the flag, exposing himself to more potential shots, had anyone been actually shooting at him…Now all they’re talking about is Leavitt’s prediction and Fox News cutting off Aminah Hasine and how fake and gay THIS ‘Trump shooting’ is!”...

The Thanksgiving false flag’s purpose was obvious (anti-immigration). The Butler ear-nick’s was even more obvious (anoint and elect Trump to obey Israel’s orders to attack Iran). But last night’s shooting at the Washington Hilton, unlike its earlier analogues, did not wear its purpose on its sleeve. Was it meant to demonize award-winning teachers or computer scientists or game developers? Probably not. Was it intended to demonstrate the need for a secure White House ballroom? That is one theory making the rounds on social media...

The theory that Trump’s people would use a false flag to get a ballroom built sounds farfetched. But as Wikipedia tells us, “The project's above-ground construction has faced legal challenges, with construction as of April 18 being allowed to continue until June 2026.” Opponents of the project have called it sickeningly tacky, ostentatious, typically-Trumpian tasteless fiasco that defecates all over the historical integrity of the White House. The National Trust for Historic Preservation has sued to stop the project, while “the Trump administration replied that the ballroom construction must continue for classified reasons of national security that may be shared with the judge but not with the plaintiffs.”

Just as Trump’s anti-immigration agenda had faced legal as well as political challenges that miraculously evaporated in the wake of the Thanksgiving shooting, so too his ballroom project has probably gone from “possibly obstructed” to “a done deal” thanks to last night’s false flag. So maybe those crazy conspiracy theorists aren’t so crazy. “There’s no way they staged this poo just so he can justify building a ballroom LMFAOOOOOOOOOOO.” (1.5 million views.)

Then again, all that ballroom-building blather could be a smokescreen for a deeper and more nefarious plan: Intimidate Trump into escalating the war on Iran. That would explain three strange, Israel-linked aspects of the shooting: the patsy’s social media profile featuring a picture of him wearing an IDF sweatshirt; the patsy’s name being allegedly researched in Israel less than 24 hours before the attack; and the shooting erupting at the exact moment that an Israeli magician was terrifying Melania by exposing private information she had thought was secret. Taken together, those three odd Israeli connections to the event could easily be read as a message: “We know your Epstein secrets, we are the magicians creating these and other tricks, and we can get to you any time we like…so follow orders or else.”

Israel has every reason to try to force Trump to accept the disastrous political price he is paying for this misbegotten war, by threatening him with even worse consequences if he seeks an off Quote:
-ramp...



Full report with sources/links:

https://kevinbarrett.substack.com/p/another-trump-shooting-false-flag



Quote:
....sounds farfetched. But as Wikipedia tells us.....


Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Grin Grin Grin

Funny.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20665
Gender: male
Re: Whitehouse Correspondents' Dinner Shooting?
Reply #77 - May 3rd, 2026 at 1:11pm
 
...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 152362
Gender: male
Re: Whitehouse Correspondents' Dinner Shooting?
Reply #78 - May 3rd, 2026 at 1:50pm
 
lee wrote on May 3rd, 2026 at 1:11pm:


Who says the guy they arrested - who didn't fire a single shot - will spend the rest of his life in prison?

Who says he's in custody now?

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20665
Gender: male
Re: Whitehouse Correspondents' Dinner Shooting?
Reply #79 - May 3rd, 2026 at 2:27pm
 
Stay tuned. Wink

greggerypeccary wrote on May 3rd, 2026 at 1:50pm:
Who says he's in custody now?



AI.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 152362
Gender: male
Re: Whitehouse Correspondents' Dinner Shooting?
Reply #80 - May 3rd, 2026 at 2:31pm
 
lee wrote on May 3rd, 2026 at 2:27pm:
Stay tuned. Wink

greggerypeccary wrote on May 3rd, 2026 at 1:50pm:
Who says he's in custody now?



AI.


Oh well.

Case closed.
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20665
Gender: male
Re: Whitehouse Correspondents' Dinner Shooting?
Reply #81 - May 3rd, 2026 at 2:48pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on May 3rd, 2026 at 2:31pm:
Case closed.



Nope. It will go before the courts. Unless you have another conspiracy theory you want to trot out? Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 152362
Gender: male
Re: Whitehouse Correspondents' Dinner Shooting?
Reply #82 - May 3rd, 2026 at 2:56pm
 
lee wrote on May 3rd, 2026 at 2:48pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 3rd, 2026 at 2:31pm:
Case closed.



Nope. It will go before the courts. Unless you have another conspiracy theory you want to trot out? Wink


I have no conspiracy theories.

I'm just stating a fact: we don't know if the alleged intruder is in custody or not.

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20665
Gender: male
Re: Whitehouse Correspondents' Dinner Shooting?
Reply #83 - May 3rd, 2026 at 3:16pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on May 3rd, 2026 at 2:56pm:
I'm just stating a fact: we don't know if the alleged intruder is in custody or not.


We can assume because a big deal would have been made of it, if he had been released. Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 152362
Gender: male
Re: Whitehouse Correspondents' Dinner Shooting?
Reply #84 - May 3rd, 2026 at 3:42pm
 
lee wrote on May 3rd, 2026 at 3:16pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on May 3rd, 2026 at 2:56pm:
I'm just stating a fact: we don't know if the alleged intruder is in custody or not.


We can assume because a big deal would have been made of it, if he had been released. Grin


How would we know if he had been released?

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20665
Gender: male
Re: Whitehouse Correspondents' Dinner Shooting?
Reply #85 - May 3rd, 2026 at 4:33pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on May 3rd, 2026 at 3:42pm:
How would we know if he had been released?



Social media - the harbinger of truth. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
waggawoody
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3438
Wagga Wagga
Re: Whitehouse Correspondents' Dinner Shooting?
Reply #86 - May 3rd, 2026 at 7:30pm
 
Frank wrote on May 2nd, 2026 at 8:22am:
Quote:
....sounds farfetched. But as Wikipedia tells us.....


Funny


Why?


"The US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted an administrative stay after the Trump administration appealed against US District Judge Richard Leon's decision to halt above-ground construction on Thursday."

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/clyx9xyy0j9o
Back to top
 

Hamas, to my great regret, is Israel’s creation

Avner Cohen, former Israeli official, Wall Street Journal, 2009
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 58047
Gender: male
Re: Whitehouse Correspondents' Dinner Shooting?
Reply #87 - Yesterday at 11:20am
 
Big Donger wrote on Apr 27th, 2026 at 12:06am:
Bobby. wrote on Apr 26th, 2026 at 8:40pm:
He's tinted:


[url]https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/74/b5/03/74b503a690d8dbf97dfb735
a5ee18cb4.png[/url]


Ah. You've finally said it.

Thanks, Bobby, this is all we need to know.






...

U.S. — Following the harrowing incident at the White House Correspondents' Dinner over the weekend, progressives across the United States applauded the steadily improving diversity of would-be Trump assassins.

With many liberals concerned over the lack of minority representation among people trying to assassinate Trump, Democrats breathed a sigh of relief after learning that the latest failed assassin was black.

"For too long, the would-be Trump killer space has been dominated by white men," said local liberal Jamie Gallagher. "Today was a long-overdue step forward in assassin representation. It's really encouraging to see people from different ethnic backgrounds engage in political violence. I just hope it helps little kids know that their skin color and sexual orientation do not have to hold them back from trying to kill Donald Trump."

While stating there was still more work to be done, DEI advocacy groups hailed the news of a minority assassin as a landmark victory. "When you see people of all different skin tones and socioeconomic classes trying to murder political figures, you know you've done your job," said DEI consultant Mary Harding. "To be clear, we are not there yet. There are still so many underrepresented groups who face significant barriers in trying to assassinate world leaders. We will continue the hard work of ensuring real equity among people shooting guns at President Trump."

At publishing time, progressives admitted that they had been crossing their fingers in hopes that the failed assassin would also turn out to be gay.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 
Send Topic Print