Arresting old people because of what is written on their T-shirt. Straight from the UK playbook, but the authorities turn a blind eye to the IDF thug above.
From facebook today:-
Quote:Stone Age Utopia Independent Media
SILENCED IN BRISBANE: The Truth Behind Crisafulli’s New ‘Hate Laws’
*Don't forget to like, comment, share if you appreciate our content*
The streets of Brisbane were marked by a chilling scene over the weekend as more than 20 peaceful protesters were led away in handcuffs under the state’s new ‘hate speech’ laws. For those scrolling through social media, the footage is a stark warning that what you say on a Saturday afternoon can now officially land you in a cell. While commercial news frames this as a necessary crackdown on extremism, the reality is far more calculated: a targeted effort to silence dissent by redefining the language of human rights as a criminal offense.
At the heart of this crackdown is a singular, terrifying figure: a 188% spike in antisemitic incidents used by the Crisafulli Government to justify the laws. However, when you peel back the label, the data shows that 97.2% of these ‘attacks’ involved no physical violence. Instead, the figure was inflated by logging verbal abuse (34.6%), stickers and posters (32.5%), and graffiti (30.1%). By stripping away this context, the state has effectively transformed political stickers on a lamppost into a legislative emergency.
This legislative surge did not happen in a vacuum; it was built on an exclusive partnership between the LNP and powerful Zionist lobby groups like the 'Queensland Jewish Board of Deputies (QJBD)'. Behind these organizations stands the immense ‘soft power’ of billionaire philanthropists like John Gandel, Harry Triguboff, and Frank Lowy. These figures have long-standing histories of political support in Australia, ensuring that the government’s definition of ‘hate’ aligns perfectly with the interests of those who have the Premier’s ear, effectively outsourcing the state's legal definitions to private advocacy groups.
While Crisafulli's door was wide open for these lobby groups, Palestinian representative bodies were met with a total ‘no show’. Grassroots activists were never invited to define their own language or explain the cultural weight of their protests before their words were criminalized. This selective consultation means that the very people being prosecuted were the only ones denied a seat at the table, creating a legal landscape where one community is given the power to police the vocabulary of another.
Consequently, the government has hijacked the meaning of phrases like ‘from the river to the sea’. In the hands of the state and the QJBD, it is legally defined as a ‘terrorist slogan’, but for the people on the ground, it represents a peaceful vision for secular democracy and equal human rights across the land. By criminalizing this call for equality and freedom from military rule, the law forces a pro-Israel interpretation onto the public, turning a demand for decolonization into a jailable act regardless of the speaker's intent.
This suppression of speech comes as the death toll in Palestine has soared to over 72,000, with thousands more killed or displaced in Lebanon, compared to roughly 2,000 deaths in Israel. The human cost of the conflict is being erased by laws that treat the expression of Palestinian grief as a threat to public order.
"It feels like we are being arrested just for refusing to look away from the bodies," says 21-year-old Brisbane student Amina Ziad. "They have made our mourning a crime."
Ultimately, these laws serve to shut down the most urgent debate of our time: whether a genocide is being committed. While independent bodies like the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention and UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese have explicitly warned of genocidal actions, Queenslanders are now legally barred from using the slogans that highlight this reality. By silencing the language of the oppressed, the state has effectively shielded a foreign power from the scrutiny of the Australian public, choosing political convenience over the fundamental right to speak the truth.