Baronvonrort wrote on Apr 20
th, 2026 at 10:57pm:
scope wrote on Apr 20
th, 2026 at 8:56am:
Baronvonrort wrote on Apr 19
th, 2026 at 11:41pm:
scope wrote on Apr 14
th, 2026 at 5:26pm:
Here is a truth you run away from baron.
As of October 2024, since the 1970s, at least 28 women[1] have accused Donald Trump of various acts of sexual misconduct, including rape, sex with minors, sexual assault, physical abuse, kissing and groping without consent, looking under women's skirts, and walking in on naked pageant contestants.
Never mind baron, once trump is gone im sure you will find another propaganda job somewhere, maybe Putin will have an opening.
Trump has zero criminal convictions for all those allegations.
Is innocent until proven guilty a legal concept that only applies to leftists or does it apply to everyone?
How did this work out for Hillary?
Quote: How many men do you know who have been accused of sexual assault baron?
I have met thousands of people in my lifetime, not one has ever been accused of any sexual assault , not one.
What we do know about trump is that he was found liable for sexual assault in a court of law. A jury found overwhelming evidence that he assaulted a women . Makes you see all those allegations in a different light doesn't it. Remember this is the man who fought tooth and nail for 3 years,to not have to give a DNA sample, I wonder why an innocent man would refuse to give a dna sample especially when it would prove he didnt do anything as he claimed.
Why do you support somebody who was found liable for sexual assault baron?
Trump was found liable in a civil court not a criminal court where evidence standards are greater.
OJ Simpson was found not guilty in criminal court "If the glove doesn't fit you must acquit"
OJ was found liable for $$$$ in civil court despite being found not guilty in criminal court.
Do you see a major flaw with civil courts in the US?
Why did EJC not report this when it happened it appears strange she would post being a massive fan of Trumps show the apprentice after this alleged incident?
Did she proceed because a major democrat supporter offered to finance her case in civil court?
Her post saying she was a massive fan of the apprentice is still up on FB how many rape victims do you think are a fan of their alleged rapist?
https://www.facebook.com/EJeanCarroll/posts/10151557475215176/ After all that blah blah blah, you still wont address the DNA issue, I wonder why a man who said "I dont know that women,we never met" only to change his claim after pictures of them together proved once again he was lying, would run away from evidence that would prove his innocence.
If trump did nothing wrong, why fight for 3 years to prevent DNA evidence from being produced in court.
An innocent man, would welcome the chance to prove his innocence, thats where his whole story falls apart.
Im betting trump poo himself when he learned that carrol had the dress with DNA on it.
You want to deflect to Clinton all the time, thats fine. Unlike you I hold all men proven of sexual assault in any form to be monsters.
Yet you continue to defend trump even after he was found liable and you continue to ignore the DNA issue.
Why do you defend sexual abusers baron?