Frank wrote on Apr 28
th, 2026 at 5:21pm:
There was no 'Palestinian Liberation Movement' against the Ottomans or the various Islamic caliphates before them or against the Byzantines.
Nor against Egypt in Gaza or Jordan in the WB before 1967.
The unabating bellyache is about the Jews, not foreign rule as such. It is a slap in the face of Islam, Mohammed and the Koran that the Jews re-conquered a previously Muslim-conquered and occupied area.
Once Muslim, always Muslim. That's why Muslims believe that Southern Spain, Al Aldaluse, is rightfully still theirs.
As is Lakemba and Greenacre, insh'allah.
Easy to identify your errors as usual.
1. Palestine was part of the Ottoman empire, the last islamic empire since the conquest of Byzantine Palistina by the Arabs at the beginning of the Muslim global conquest.
Palestinians had no need of a 'Palestinian Liberation Movement', even if they didn't like their Ottoman overlords.
(Re Lawrences's promises to the Arabs:
(google)
"T.E. Lawrence ("Lawrence of Arabia") did not personally promise Palestine to the Arabs, but he acted as an agent for the British government, which made ambiguous and conflicting promises. While encouraging the Arab Revolt, Lawrence intended for Arab independence, but Palestine was later excluded from this arrangement to satisfy British and Zionist interests.2. The bellyache is about infidel Jews forcefully occupying Palestine, when the UN had no capacity to ensure security between Israel and Palestine.
3. The Jews in Byzantine Palistina welcomed the Arab conquest because they hated oppressive Byzantine rule.
4. 'Once Israel always Israel?...even after 2 millennia?
Spain of course was reconquered by Christians - which Muslims have accepted without ongoing "terrorism" to restore Spain for islam ; whereas Israel was merely proclaimned by the UN, beginning the endless war.
We need an intelligent US administration to finally end the war, by implemeting UN res 181; most of the Arab world would welcome it after the chaos of the last 80 years.