Frank wrote on Apr 26^th, 2026 at 8:11pm:


Unarmed people with their hands tied behind their backs?

Frank wrote on Apr 26^th, 2026 at 8:27pm:


No, I've read the charging documents.

He's charged with murdering an unarmed person who had their hands tied behind their backs.

I only deal in objective facts.

You?

Frank wrote on Apr 26^th, 2026 at 8:54pm:


Nobody is talking about newspapers.

The official law enforcement/court charging documents allege that he murdered an unarmed person who had their hands tied behind their backs.

What part of this don't you understand?

Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Apr 27^th, 2026 at 8:48pm:

The 'should have known' standard (also known as constructive knowledge) in command responsibility holds a military commander or superior criminally liable for crimes committed by subordinates if they failed to properly supervise their forces, leading to an ignorance that is considered criminally negligent.

The test does not require proof of actual knowledge, but rather that the commander had alarming information that should have led them to act.

Baronvonrort wrote on Apr 28^th, 2026 at 12:01am:


Same here.... this is madness... I note that the new 'Army Chief' "served' in Afghanistan - was this part of the Dubai Party clique who occasionally visited?

I've posted on Farcebook the simple truth that long ago when the Brereton Report came out I read its evidence (got a heap of laughing faces - morons) - and saw no single incident against BRS where there was a direct witness...  WADR to all past and serving members.  That is why he is so happy to see this trial go ahead... you can't do an assumption in a real court - though I've actually witnessed a 'magistrate' get around that by saying - "It's all circmstantial, but... guilty."

When they want to lie they lie, our courts... it's a hand-me-down from our old convicts with no rights/guards with more rights - class war to the max and it persists to this day, primarily STILL against the 'Aussie' type.

Now we have the spectre of a report that came out on A Current Affair last night.....

https://9now.nine.com.au/a-current-affair/couple-claims-theyve-been-wrongly-put-...

Anyone remember - from my first book - where I said that those who posted negative views in the 'law reform commission' over the PLAN (not the principle) for the introduction of 'domestic violence laws', and pointed out the clear failings, illegalities, and future potential for perversion - were - within a year of so, handed totally spurious demands to go to court to defend something such - in a totally stacked court - and were even persecuted while going about their legitimate business as the non-criminals they are, false arrest and so forth?

So this couple seem to have tried to do the right thing - and have been persecuted by an almost shadowy 'police intelligence unit' as a result.... this will be a very interesting case.

Now we have certain reflections from this BRS farce....... including betrayal by past 'mates ... go for 'em, Ben!!

Note - the new sheila 'Army chief' - what else can we expect from AlboGroup? ... is said to have been:-  "former commander of Task Group Afghanistan" ...an adminstrative position, of course.... probably based in Dubai with the occasional fly-in, while LtCs were likely the highest ranks actually on the ground... and cerainly possibly only Majors in combat roles.... and it appears even then not Direct Combat.... unlike - say the Canadians, Brits and Yanks.

"Based on available reports regarding Australian operations in Afghanistan, the highest rank frequently involved in direct, frontline combat—including leading patrols and engaging enemy forces during special operations—was that of a Corporal. "

"While senior officers (Colonels and above) were in theatre commanding the broader mission, direct frontline combat was led by senior non-commissioned officers and junior officers."

I said that Young Hastie (Captain SASR = 2nd Lt) was 5000 feet above the action in a chopper during the action when The Hand (Thing) came onboard.... shocking him to tears....

Baronvonrort wrote on Apr 28^th, 2026 at 12:01am:




April 26, 2026
The Noticer
Hundreds of patriotic protesters have marched through Melbourne’s CBD to show their support for SAS hero Ben Roberts-Smith as he fights war crimes charges.

The demonstration, organised by nationalist community group the National Workers Alliance (NWA), started at 12 pm and included a march with a banner reading “Ben Roberts-Smith VC, warrior not criminal”.

Many attendees wore medals and carried Australian flags, while others held placards and signs saying “warrior not criminal”, “bravery and betrayal” and
“stop the witch-hunt”, and wore T-shirts saying “We stand with Ben Roberts-Smith”.

A small group of Antifa ratbags tried to gatecrash the rally but were heavily outnumbered and forced to stand at a distance where they shouted anti-Australian anti-veteran slogans, including “death, death to the ADF”.

The far-left extremist ratbags also yelled “always was, always will be aboriginal land” while the Ben Roberts-Smith supporters held a minute of silence in remembrance of fallen Australian soldiers.