lee wrote on Apr 19
th, 2026 at 12:10pm:
MeisterEckhart wrote on Apr 18
th, 2026 at 7:19pm:
I didn't say they were, only that there could be - e.g. high-level identities taking up the cause of the alleged murdered's relatives or clan... or even the nation-state itself wanting justice for its citizens being seen to be done.
Then they would not be witnesses.
But possible advocates for witnesses.
It's more than likely that there is an international component to this.
The unnecessarily maximally visible and dramatic arrest of BRS was likely not for Australian eyes. His arrest was clear and obvious via video footage, even with the sound turned down (i.e. no translation required).
Of course, BRS only has himself to blame for any international pressure. His decision to sue for defamation resulted in an Australian court finding that he probably committed murder(s).
From an international perspective, what else should result from an Australian court finding an Australian probably committed murder(s) if not the case being taken up by a higher court to determine if his guilt is beyond a reasonable doubt?
The arrest of BRS has absolved the Australian government of international accusations of ignoring or disregarding possible injustice meted out to Afghan citizens.