Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
NASA to colonise moon (Read 268 times)
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Online



Posts: 56516
Gender: male
Re: NASA to colonise moon
Reply #15 - Mar 28th, 2026 at 3:19pm
 
Dnarever wrote on Mar 28th, 2026 at 9:43am:
Quote:
NASA to colonise moon


WHY ?

This may have been reasonable in the 1970's but now there is no benifit as far as I can see with our current tech and knowledge.

Unless of course we can send Trump as the moons first perminent resident.

Exactly.
But as you can see it's just a fundraising scam for NASA, as is the Mars wank.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 118447
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: NASA to colonise moon
Reply #16 - Mar 28th, 2026 at 5:44pm
 
The Moon dust makes it too difficult.


Google AI:

Moon dust (lunar regolith) is extremely dangerous to astronauts and equipment, acting as a major environmental hazard. Composed of tiny, jagged, and electrostatically charged particles, this dust is highly abrasive, damaging spacesuits and clogging equipment. If inhaled, it causes "lunar hay fever," a severe respiratory irritation.

Key dangers of lunar dust include:

Respiratory and Physical Harm: Inhaled dust can damage lung tissues and, in the long term, potentially cause cellular destruction or diseases similar to silicosis. Apollo astronauts reported symptoms such as sneezing, coughing, and itchy throats.


Abrasive Nature: Because there is no wind to erode the particles, they are sharp, like tiny glass shards, causing severe scratches to seals, helmets, and equipment.


Contamination and Stickiness: The dust is electrostatically charged and clings to everything, making it difficult to remove from spacesuits before entering, potentially contaminating the habitat.


Operational Damage: It can cause thermal control problems by darkening surfaces, increase mechanical wear, and pose risks to sensitive electronics and cameras.

NASA and other space agencies consider this one of the most critical challenges for future lunar missions, requiring advanced mitigation strategies.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Carl D
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10806
Rivervale, Perth
Gender: male
Re: NASA to colonise moon
Reply #17 - Mar 28th, 2026 at 6:05pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Mar 28th, 2026 at 10:20am:
scope wrote on Mar 27th, 2026 at 5:11pm:
Carl D wrote on Mar 27th, 2026 at 2:07pm:
freediver wrote on Mar 27th, 2026 at 11:43am:
On March 24, 2026, NASA announced new initiatives to increase missions to the moon and establish a permanent base there.


Well, as long as it is run by pretty ladies (with or without the purple wigs) I'm all for it.

Smiley


Loved that show, you know those lovely ladies are well into their 70's now Carl.


Nick Drake's sister was in that show.

Gabrielle Drake.

She's 81 now.



And Gabrielle still looks great even in her later years.

(There's no date for the attached picture from her IMDb Profile.)

Back to top
 

gabrielle.jpg (55 KB | 2 )
gabrielle.jpg

** Repeat Covid infections exercise our immune system in the same way that repeat concussions exercise our brain **
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print