aquascoot wrote on Mar 24
th, 2026 at 3:51pm:
SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 24
th, 2026 at 3:27pm:
aquascoot wrote on Mar 24
th, 2026 at 1:08pm:
Jasin wrote on Mar 24
th, 2026 at 1:05pm:
Sprint , gweg and roo will be along shortly to say the big fellas got dementia and he has failed at every business he ever ran
This isn't some stroke of economic genius, it's corrupt market manipulation dressed up as leadership, and the only reason you're clapping along is because it's coming from Trump.
What this thread actually is, is a coping mechanism, a place for increasingly nervous Trump supporters to reassure each other that everything is still on track, that the chaos is somehow part of the plan, that the cracks aren't real.
But they are real, and the fact you felt the need to post this at all gives the game away. Confidence doesn't need constant reinforcement, and it certainly doesn't need threads like this to prop it up.
If you're willing to defend this, you've forfeited any credibility you ever claimed to have when you were screaming about the Bidens, Burisma, and Ukraine. Even when that narrative was shaky at best, you treated it like the crime of the century, yet here you are openly backing something that is transparently corrupt because it suits your side.
You can feel it slipping, even if you won't admit it.
Incorrect
You have failed to understand the paradigm shift.
It is no longer about who is right and who is wrong or indeed right v wrong
It is no longer about facts and fictions.
We can all have our own truths.
Grace tame can support Hamas and her river to the sea.
I can support the young Persian lady about to be hung and trumps attempt to kill her oppressors.
Who is right?
Stupid question.
It is now about who is effective and who is ineffective.
Unfortunately , karmal and gweg saying donny is in a diaper are ineffective.
Donny running global reform is effective.
Worth studying
You're the political equivalent of a dog that finally caught the car, then stood there stunned, paralysed by the sudden realisation that bluster isn't a substitute for competence.
For years you've lectured everyone about "facts over feelings", sneering at so-called leftie intellectuals as though evidence and rigour were your personal brand. Yet the moment outcomes didn't magically validate your worldview, the standard evaporated. Now, with the Voice rejected and Donald Trump consolidating control across the machinery of the US government, you've pivoted from epistemic certainty to this soft-headed relativism about "everyone having their own truths".
That's not a principled evolution, it's a retreat.
You wanted the scoreboard to matter when you thought you were winning. Now that reality demands accountability, suddenly truth is negotiable, facts are optional, and feelings are back on the menu, just rebranded as something more palatable to your side. It's the same safe-space thinking you spent years deriding, only now it's draped in the language of convenience.
What's actually happened is simple, you've discovered that winning slogans is far easier than governing outcomes, and far less demanding than defending them under scrutiny. When the consequences arrive, when the contradictions become unavoidable, when the neat narratives collapse under their own weight, you don't resolve the tension, you dissolve the standard.
And that's why this shift matters. Not because it's surprising, but because it exposes the whole "facts over feelings" posture as contingent, something you wore when it was useful, and discarded the moment it wasn't.
If you weren't already seen as joke of a man, this seals it. Not because you're wrong on a particular issue, but because you've abandoned the very framework you insisted everyone else live by the second it became inconvenient.
For someone who goes on about how tough they are compared to those you disagree with, you've just exposed how much of a weakling you really are.
Forum
Pages: 
