Didn't you cheer on the BLM and illegal immigrants who burned, looted, rioted, raped, bashed and killed American citizens across the country?
Oh yes. You did.
Your moral compass has a fridge magnet attached to it.

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 11:37am:



This young Iranian women went forward with a spirit of bravery and courage to defy the evil establishment and will now be executed.

Thus a quality woman.

Women of the left like say , grace tame or mahreen fanuki or fatima payman go forward with a spirit of entitlement  compliance with a woke ideology and are in no danger of being executed for supporting a misogynistic brutal regime

Thus a non quality woman ,

aquascoot wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 12:30pm:


You elevate one Iranian woman to "quality" because she defies a brutal regime and faces execution. Fine, courageous, yes. But then you dismiss Grace Tame, Mahreen Fanuki, and Fatima Payman as "non-quality" for supposedly acting within some "woke ideology" and not being at risk of execution.

Here's the problem: all three of them have stood up against entrenched power structures, challenged institutions, and faced real-world consequences, harassment, legal battles, political attacks. They have risked themselves to push against the establishment. By your own logic, shouldn't that make them "quality" too?

Or does bravery only count when death is literally imminent?

So women are only quality if they're about to be executed?

And let's be honest here, it looks suspiciously like you've lifted this "quality women" standard straight from the beta-cucks populating the manosphere, the same crowd that reduces women to arbitrary hierarchies designed to flatter their own fragile egos. That's not a measure of courage or principle, it's a borrowed ranking system meant to feed insecurity.

If you're going to continue using "quality" as a standard, spell it out. What exactly do you mean by quality?

Is it a willingness to risk life under a dictatorship?

Willingness to confront any power, regardless of context?

Or is it just a partisan, copied-and-pasted brainrot to decide whose courage counts and whose doesn't?

Until you clarify, all you're doing is throwing around arbitrary labels to suit your worldview and pretending that's insight.

Right now, "quality" is just an empty buzzword wrapped in contradiction and manosphere cosplay.

Define your terms.

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 1:07pm:


It's "partisan, copied-and-pasted brainrot".

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 1:07pm:



This is very stupid. It would be also sinister if it wasn't soooo stupid.


It takes a deranged village idiot from meanjin  to equate standing up to the Iranian theocracy with standing up in the Australian Parliament or on the ABC and spouting paki/pallo propaganda.

aquascoot wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 1:18pm:


And after all that, you've still not answered the question.

Why is it so damn hard for you and the rest of the usual suspects to actually explain what the words they throw around mean, or why they support something, or the goals they claim to back when defending someone's actions, while simultaneously demanding those who don't agree to propose alternate outcomes?

Do they genuinely not understand the thoughts they've been fed, or do they simply not believe they can defend their own positions without looking like fools?

This is a discussion forum, for God's sake. How are we meant to converse if you can't even articulate what you think? Is it that the light of day alone terrifies you?

Why even bother showing up?

Frank wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 2:48pm:



Disappeared bodies, mass burials and ‘30,000 dead’: what is the truth of Iran’s death toll?
This article is more than 1 month old
Testimony from medics, morgue and graveyard staff reveals huge state effort to conceal systematic killing of protesters




https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2026/jan/27/iran-protests-death-t...


And morons like "Press me, I'm a Sad Tit" from meanjin    are 'celebrating' the 'bravery' of Graceless Lame, Faaruqi and Payme,Man et al.
Ludicrous, stupid, mentally cack-handed, idiotic.

SadKangaroo wrote on Mar 26^th, 2026 at 3:07pm:


Yes, I've noticed that from the very beginning.

The cult's Kryptonite is women.

And if they're coloured women or, God forbid, intelligent women, the cult members just can't handle it.

It's both very interesting and extremely sad to witness.

I think Diaper Don has some very serious mommy issues, and they've rubbed off onto his cult members.