thegreatdivide
Gold Member
   
Offline

Australian Politics<br />
Posts: 15252
Gender:
|
Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Mar 23 rd, 2026 at 3:41pm: thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 23 rd, 2026 at 12:35pm: Ai_Took_Our_Jobs wrote on Mar 23 rd, 2026 at 10:13am: "The Greens are moribund"Greens 83,511 10.4% +1.3% Still an outside chance of a lower house seat, if they get into second place, will win on preferences. https://www.abc.net.au/news/elections/sa/2026/guide/heysAssisted Labor in holding on some seats where Labor's primary collapsed. Greens are fine. No they are not, they have been stuck on c.11% (Oz wide) for a decade, despite the c-o-l and housing crisis...while ON has soared since the last federal election. Leader Adam Bandt's loss, due to changing voting patterns at the last federal election, was a disaster for the Greens. (google) Adan Bandt was ousted from his formerly safe seat of Melbourne due to a confluence of factors, including a voter swing toward Labor to prevent a conservative government, the flow of Liberal preferences to Labor, and local frustration with the party’s campaign focus. And now the Libs see they will have to join ON..... Your original comment was that Greens where dying. Now you say they are stable on 11% That's a back peddle. No it isn't; moribund has different emphasis of defintion: (google) Synonyms of Moribund
Dying/Declining: Expiring, failing, passing, perishing, waning, ebbing.
Stagnant/Inactive: Stagnating, forceless, lifeless, at a standstill.I had the 2nd definition in mind, ie the Greens are at a standstill, even (in 2025) losing their leader in the housing, c-o-l, and inequality crisis, the very things the Greens promote themselves as having the solutions (higher taxes on wealth and greedy fossil-company price gougers).
|