Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9
Send Topic Print
the gullibility of climate 'sceptics' (Read 1702 times)
Melanias purse
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 101356
Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #75 - Yesterday at 1:17pm
 
aquascoot wrote Yesterday at 11:45am:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 10:23am:
Is the green bit supposed to be under water in that map Scoot?

Can you point out the bit that says it is a prediction for 2014?

Or were you being just a little bit gullible?

Did you actually remember it yourself, or do you merely believe every idiotic claim that comes across your facebook feed?

aquascoot wrote on Mar 10th, 2026 at 1:08pm:
We all remember al gores map of florida , completely under water by 2014.



Hi there freediver. Do you think the claim that we might be facing a 6 m sea level rise was idiotic.

Do you just believe every idiotic claim

Do you think the ACT saying they are not using fossil fuels is idiotic.

Do you just believe every idiotic claim.

You are welcome to your truth.
As I say we live in a post truth world.
If the elites claiming sea level will rise _6metres helps them monetise climate change and make more cash by scaring stupid people, more power to them.
They are within their rights to rip off the useful idiots  Wink


I'm not seeing a question mark here, dear. Are you making this claim?

I'd suggest it's a little idiotic to say the ACT said that.

Some would call it a lie.

You?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Melanias purse
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 101356
Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #76 - Yesterday at 1:19pm
 
lee wrote Yesterday at 1:01pm:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 12:54pm:
I want to point out the gullibility of clime 'sceptics'. Hence the thread title: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'


And yet you haven't backed up your assertions with proof. Cool


He's right, FD. To date, you have not proven the gullibility of climate "sceptics".

The only thing proven in this thread is their willingness to deceive, back up their claims with lies, and run off.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20146
Gender: male
Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #77 - Yesterday at 1:37pm
 
freediver wrote Yesterday at 1:04pm:
What powered the pumped hydro stations prior to fossil fuels Lee?


How big was it? And how was it powered? Was it boiler driven? Boiler pumps have been around for centuries, fossil fuelled centrifugal pumps only since the early 1900's.

freediver wrote Yesterday at 1:04pm:
I present to you, this thread.


Which carries more of your assertions than known facts. See above. Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
freediver
Gold Member
*****
Offline


www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 52794
At my desk.
Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #78 - Yesterday at 1:53pm
 
I am asking you Lee.

lee wrote Yesterday at 1:00pm:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 7:34am:
Yes Lee. Pumped Hydro is a type of battery. Welcome to the 21st century. Actually we had them early in the last century, to deal with the fact that coal fired power stations are not sufficiently dispatchable to match demand patterns.


Nope. we had them early in the last century but they were overtaken by fossil fuels. They were better at it. We didn't run out of water. Wink

They couldn't meet demand. And they don't now, they are a battery type, but they still only provide back up. Wink


Shocked

What powered the pumped hydro stations prior to fossil fuels Lee?
Back to top
 

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57231
Gender: male
Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #79 - Yesterday at 2:21pm
 
freediver wrote Yesterday at 7:34am:
Pumped Hydro is a type of battery. Welcome to the 21st century.



Coal, oil are a kind of solar energy battery.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Melanias purse
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 101356
Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #80 - Yesterday at 2:30pm
 
Frank wrote Yesterday at 2:21pm:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 7:34am:
Pumped Hydro is a type of battery. Welcome to the 21st century.


Coal, oil are a kind of solar energy battery.


Which brings us back to doe.

What have you got against coal and oil, FD?

Not wacist, are you?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Melanias purse
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 101356
Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #81 - Yesterday at 2:34pm
 
freediver wrote Yesterday at 1:53pm:
I am asking you Lee.

lee wrote Yesterday at 1:00pm:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 7:34am:
Yes Lee. Pumped Hydro is a type of battery. Welcome to the 21st century. Actually we had them early in the last century, to deal with the fact that coal fired power stations are not sufficiently dispatchable to match demand patterns.


Nope. we had them early in the last century but they were overtaken by fossil fuels. They were better at it. We didn't run out of water. Wink

They couldn't meet demand. And they don't now, they are a battery type, but they still only provide back up. Wink


Shocked

What powered the pumped hydro stations prior to fossil fuels Lee?


And when you're done with that, what powered the hand cars?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20146
Gender: male
Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #82 - Yesterday at 4:13pm
 
freediver wrote Yesterday at 1:53pm:
What powered the pumped hydro stations prior to fossil fuels Lee?


I can't give a definitive answer. Perhaps you can tell us how the slaves carried it up the hill in buckets. Grin Grin Grin Grin

But boilers burned wood to create steam, as well as coal. Wood is not a fossil fuel, but a precursor to fossil fuel. Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57231
Gender: male
Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #83 - Yesterday at 4:34pm
 
lee wrote Yesterday at 4:13pm:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 1:53pm:
What powered the pumped hydro stations prior to fossil fuels Lee?


I can't give a definitive answer. Perhaps you can tell us how the slaves carried it up the hill in buckets. Grin Grin Grin Grin

But boilers burned wood to create steam, as well as coal. Wood is not a fossil fuel, but a precursor to fossil fuel. Wink



But it's a 'kinda' battery, like pumped hydro.  Wink

And it is ENTIRELY solar-powered.


Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 37511
Gender: male
Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #84 - Yesterday at 4:48pm
 
freediver wrote Yesterday at 11:51am:
Scoot, do you still believe that the map shows Florida completely underwater by 2014?

The only idiotic claims I see here come from you and the other climate "sceptics".



6metres which is a figure gore used in the movie would certainly see the entirety of miami and Manhattan under water.


A smart move.

It helped monetize the grift.

Many useless idiots brought into the bullshit  Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Melanias purse
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 101356
Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #85 - Yesterday at 5:49pm
 
aquascoot wrote Yesterday at 4:48pm:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 11:51am:
Scoot, do you still believe that the map shows Florida completely underwater by 2014?

The only idiotic claims I see here come from you and the other climate "sceptics".



6metres which is a figure gore used in the movie would certainly see the entirety of miami and Manhattan under water.


I see. So you're finally admitting Al Gore never made a prediction of Florida being under water by 2014, are you?

That's a start. I do feel we're getting somewhere.

Now, can you post us the map you remember?

You may care to post us a YouTube clip of an Inconvenient Truth with your reference.

Cheers.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 37511
Gender: male
Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #86 - Yesterday at 6:27pm
 
Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 5:49pm:
aquascoot wrote Yesterday at 4:48pm:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 11:51am:
Scoot, do you still believe that the map shows Florida completely underwater by 2014?

The only idiotic claims I see here come from you and the other climate "sceptics".



6metres which is a figure gore used in the movie would certainly see the entirety of miami and Manhattan under water.


I see. So you're finally admitting Al Gore never made a prediction of Florida being under water by 2014, are you?

That's a start. I do feel we're getting somewhere.

Now, can you post us the map you remember?

You may care to post us a YouTube clip of an Inconvenient Truth with your reference.

Cheers.



You freediver and gweg are such pedants.

Try to be like the big fella.

Drill baby drill.

Get that stick out of your ass, get yourself a hot chick and learn how to tell entertaining  anecdotes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 57231
Gender: male
Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #87 - Yesterday at 6:43pm
 
Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 5:49pm:
aquascoot wrote Yesterday at 4:48pm:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 11:51am:
Scoot, do you still believe that the map shows Florida completely underwater by 2014?

The only idiotic claims I see here come from you and the other climate "sceptics".



6metres which is a figure gore used in the movie would certainly see the entirety of miami and Manhattan under water.


I see. So you're finally admitting Al Gore never made a prediction of Florida being under water by 2014, are you?

That's a start. I do feel we're getting somewhere.

Now, can you post us the map you remember?

You may care to post us a YouTube clip of an Inconvenient Truth with your reference.

Cheers.

What predictions DID Gore make, poof?

Any?
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Melanias purse
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 101356
Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #88 - Yesterday at 6:45pm
 
aquascoot wrote Yesterday at 6:27pm:
Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 5:49pm:
aquascoot wrote Yesterday at 4:48pm:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 11:51am:
Scoot, do you still believe that the map shows Florida completely underwater by 2014?

The only idiotic claims I see here come from you and the other climate "sceptics".



6metres which is a figure gore used in the movie would certainly see the entirety of miami and Manhattan under water.


I see. So you're finally admitting Al Gore never made a prediction of Florida being under water by 2014, are you?

That's a start. I do feel we're getting somewhere.

Now, can you post us the map you remember?

You may care to post us a YouTube clip of an Inconvenient Truth with your reference.

Cheers.



You freediver and gweg are such pedants.

Try to be like the big fella.

Drill baby drill.

Get that stick out of your ass, get yourself a hot chick and learn how to tell entertaining  anecdotes


No, we'll stick with your claim, thanks.

If you can't post your evidence, you'll need to admit you lied.

That's what we'd do, as you know all too well.

Say it.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Melanias purse
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 101356
Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #89 - Yesterday at 6:48pm
 
Frank wrote Yesterday at 6:43pm:
Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 5:49pm:
aquascoot wrote Yesterday at 4:48pm:
freediver wrote Yesterday at 11:51am:
Scoot, do you still believe that the map shows Florida completely underwater by 2014?

The only idiotic claims I see here come from you and the other climate "sceptics".



6metres which is a figure gore used in the movie would certainly see the entirety of miami and Manhattan under water.


I see. So you're finally admitting Al Gore never made a prediction of Florida being under water by 2014, are you?

That's a start. I do feel we're getting somewhere.

Now, can you post us the map you remember?

You may care to post us a YouTube clip of an Inconvenient Truth with your reference.

Cheers.

What predictions DID Gore make, poof?

Any?


That's a question. Feel free to post them.

Or you may care to ask Aquascoot.

And wait.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9
Send Topic Print