Australian Politics Forum - the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register

Forum rules, Recent posts (with text), RSS, Search options, Browse all uploaded images
Home, Articles, Green Tax Shift, Evolution,

Australian Politics Forum › General Discussion › General Board › the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16

the gullibility of climate 'sceptics' (Read 4880 times)

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20203
Gender: male

Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #225 - Yesterday at 6:14pm

Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 5:21pm:

Maybe Lee's been scouring the South Australian Energy Plan for typos.

No need pet. So Variable Renewable Energy did 73% in one month. Focus on the variable bit, and yet they got 73% so the blurb says. So explain to us mere mortals how VARIABLE energy can have an invariant 73%. Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 101489

Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #226 - Yesterday at 7:03pm

lee wrote Yesterday at 6:14pm:

Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 5:21pm:

Maybe Lee's been scouring the South Australian Energy Plan for typos.

It's all been shown to you, Lee.

Sheesh, it's like a broken record already. You initially thought it wasn't even 73%. Next year, you'll be telling us it's not 100%.

Solar panels don't exist, windmills are hideous, batteries don't work. And you can't find one typo.

It is a jolly world, no?

IP Logged

lee

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 20203
Gender: male

Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #227 - Yesterday at 7:19pm

Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 7:03pm:

It's all been shown to you, Lee.

Nope just a blanket statement. 73%. How does variable supply, entirely dependent on the weather, have a flat line at 73%?

Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 7:03pm:

You initially thought it wasn't even 73%.

i still don't believe it. I ask again how can a weather dependent have a flat line?

Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 7:03pm:

Solar panels don't exist, windmills are hideous, batteries don't work.

And you can't find any evidence that I said anything like that, because it doesn't exist. You are just trying to deflect. Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 101489

Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #228 - Yesterday at 10:57pm

lee wrote Yesterday at 7:19pm:

Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 7:03pm:

It's all been shown to you, Lee.

Nope just a blanket statement. 73%. How does variable supply, entirely dependent on the weather, have a flat line at 73%?

Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 7:03pm:

You initially thought it wasn't even 73%.

i still don't believe it. I ask again how can a weather dependent have a flat line?

Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 7:03pm:

Solar panels don't exist, windmills are hideous, batteries don't work.

And you can't find any evidence that I said anything like that, because it doesn't exist. You are just trying to deflect. Roll Eyes

Here you go, Gonads. We rushed out and look who lit up, dear.

Jackpot.

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33211
Gender: male

Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #229 - Today at 9:08am

Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 5:21pm:

So that's Gonads done. Who's left?

Maybe Lee's been scouring the South Australian Energy Plan for typos.

Maybe our equine friend bounced out of bed with a plan for austerity-driven East Coast power cuts.

Or maybe the old boy's got another mendaciousss left in him.

It may not happen overnight, but it will happen, no?

Dream on Purse sniffer.

All your waffle about 100% renewables supply is just that - waffle.

With another pre-cursor - "delusional" waffle.

You stick to probing the depths of a ladyboy.

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Gnads

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 33211
Gender: male

Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #230 - Today at 9:10am

Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 10:57pm:

lee wrote Yesterday at 7:19pm:

Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 7:03pm:

It's all been shown to you, Lee.

Nope just a blanket statement. 73%. How does variable supply, entirely dependent on the weather, have a flat line at 73%?

Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 7:03pm:

You initially thought it wasn't even 73%.

i still don't believe it. I ask again how can a weather dependent have a flat line?

Melanias purse wrote Yesterday at 7:03pm:

Solar panels don't exist, windmills are hideous, batteries don't work.

And you can't find any evidence that I said anything like that, because it doesn't exist. You are just trying to deflect. Roll Eyes

Here you go, Gonads. We rushed out and look who lit up, dear.

Jackpot.

Reverse that for your favourite pastime - Potjack.

"When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful and difficult for others. The same applies when you are stupid." ~ Ricky Gervais

IP Logged

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 16

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

« Forum

‹ Board

Top of this page