Australian Politics Forum - the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 57231 Gender:	Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics' Reply #105 - Today at 9:39am
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 37511
Gender: male

Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #106 - Today at 9:41am

Melanias purse wrote Today at 9:17am:

Frank wrote Today at 9:01am:

Gullible= easily persuaded to believe something; credulous

Sceptical = not easily convinced; having doubts or reservations

You havent thought this through, fd.

Just so. You're skeptical that the ACT is powered by a solar farm, is that so?

The Mugga Lane Solar Park might just be a large plastic prop, I guess we'll never know.

The jury's still out on that one, no?

An accounting trick.

Imagine if Alice Springs said they require 100 megalitres of water a week and then said they had built a dam in Tasmania which stored this level and had a certificate to say so.

We now have our water problem fixed
Do they?

If the ACT build a solar farm in qld which generates as much power as they use have they fixed the problem.
No
They have created a resource somewhere else.
They still need coal and gas at night as we all do.
And half our energy is burnt at night.
And most EVs are recharged at night using grid energy.
Energy provided by fossil fuels.

I think you and freediver are showing your stupidity Sad

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 52794
At my desk.

Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #107 - Today at 9:49am

aquascoot wrote on Mar 10^th, 2026 at 1:08pm:

We all remember al gores map of florida , completely under water by 2014.

Scoot should we anticipate you circling back in a month or so and making this idiotic claim again, pretending this thread does not even exist? Is that how a superior man acts when he realises he is wrong, or is that the behaviour of a mindless cheerleader for a lost cause?

Whatever this unidentifiable bigger issue is, or stronger feelings, that you want us to focus on rather than the fact that you are wrong all the time - how do you know you are not wrong on that as well, if you keep getting the details wrong and don't allow yourself to learn from your mistakes?

Why did you choose this claim in particular, out of all the other idiotic things I quoted you saying at the start of this thread? Do you still actually believe it, and if so, why won't you say?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged

Melanias purse Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 101356	Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics' Reply #108 - Today at 10:04am Jasin wrote Yesterday at 7:51pm: So 6 out of the 20 major Renewables Enterprises that the ALP & Greens are allowing (and causing environmental damage to build their infrastructures) are FOREIGN OWNED and a 7th being half owned by CHINA and another. That leaves just 3 as Australian. You?
Back to top	IP Logged

Melanias purse Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 101356	Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics' Reply #109 - Today at 10:09am Frank wrote Today at 9:39am: Really? So where did he predict Florida being completely underwater by 2014? Did he make another movie? Did he post a tweet? Did he give a speech? Where?
Back to top	IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 52794 At my desk.	Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics' Reply #110 - Today at 10:10am Apparently we all remember the map. We just don't know it.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101356

Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #111 - Today at 10:14am

aquascoot wrote Today at 9:41am:

Melanias purse wrote Today at 9:17am:

Frank wrote Today at 9:01am:

Gullible= easily persuaded to believe something; credulous

Sceptical = not easily convinced; having doubts or reservations

You havent thought this through, fd.

Just so. You're skeptical that the ACT is powered by a solar farm, is that so?

The Mugga Lane Solar Park might just be a large plastic prop, I guess we'll never know.

The jury's still out on that one, no?

An accounting trick.

I see. How about the Royalla solar farm?

And how about the Big Canberra Battery Project?

Is that an accounting trick too?

Back to top

IP Logged

Melanias purse Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 101356	Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics' Reply #112 - Today at 10:19am freediver wrote Today at 10:10am: Apparently we all remember the map. We just don't know it. I know. We also forgot the map of Greenland. If that "melts and breaks up", it will raise sea levels and put current coastal cities underwater. Food for thought no? I guess DL won't want Greenland then.
Back to top	IP Logged

aquascoot Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 37511 Gender:	Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics' Reply #113 - Today at 10:44am freediver wrote Today at 10:10am: Apparently we all remember the map. We just don't know it. Al gores says 6 m in the near future And the useful idiots swallow it. How Gullible
Back to top	IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 37511
Gender: male

Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #114 - Today at 10:47am

Melanias purse wrote Today at 10:14am:

aquascoot wrote Today at 9:41am:

Melanias purse wrote Today at 9:17am:

Frank wrote Today at 9:01am:

Gullible= easily persuaded to believe something; credulous

Sceptical = not easily convinced; having doubts or reservations

You havent thought this through, fd.

Just so. You're skeptical that the ACT is powered by a solar farm, is that so?

The Mugga Lane Solar Park might just be a large plastic prop, I guess we'll never know.

The jury's still out on that one, no?

An accounting trick.

I see. How about the Royalla solar farm?

And how about the Big Canberra Battery Project?

Is that an accounting trick too?

So they don't need to be connected to the National grid.

Except they do need to be connected and they are connected.

How gullible are you.

6 metre freediver and ACT Battery karnal are getting quite desperate.
They swallowed the false narrative.
Time to vomit it back up and restore health

Drill baby drill

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver Gold Member Offline www.ozpolitic.com Posts: 52794 At my desk.	Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics' Reply #115 - Today at 10:55am aquascoot wrote on Mar 10^th, 2026 at 1:08pm: We all remember al gores map of florida , completely under water by 2014. Can you show us the map Scoot? aquascoot wrote Today at 10:44am: And the useful idiots swallow it. How Gullible Indeed.
Back to top	People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words. IP Logged

aquascoot

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 37511
Gender: male

Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #116 - Today at 11:35am

freediver wrote Today at 10:55am:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 10^th, 2026 at 1:08pm:

We all remember al gores map of florida , completely under water by 2014.

Can you show us the map Scoot?

aquascoot wrote Today at 10:44am:

And the useful idiots swallow it.

How Gullible Cheesy

Indeed.

6 m says Al gores, in the near future.
And the gullible believe him.
And the map already shown to the gullible shows the entire city of Miami under water.

Meanwhile we haven't seen 6 cm.

Why can't the gullible admit they were duped.

Now get back to work and save up for the most expensive electricity in the world and 3 dollar a litre petrol .
And remember, they don't pay a wage for being a pedant

Back to top

IP Logged

Melanias purse Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 101356	Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics' Reply #117 - Today at 11:56am aquascoot wrote Today at 10:44am: freediver wrote Today at 10:10am: Apparently we all remember the map. We just don't know it. Al gores says 6 m in the near future And where did he say that? Will you provide a source, or would you prefer we provide it for you?
Back to top	IP Logged

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 101356

Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #118 - Today at 11:57am

aquascoot wrote Today at 10:47am:

Melanias purse wrote Today at 10:14am:

aquascoot wrote Today at 9:41am:

Melanias purse wrote Today at 9:17am:

Frank wrote Today at 9:01am:

Gullible= easily persuaded to believe something; credulous

Sceptical = not easily convinced; having doubts or reservations

You havent thought this through, fd.

Just so. You're skeptical that the ACT is powered by a solar farm, is that so?

The Mugga Lane Solar Park might just be a large plastic prop, I guess we'll never know.

The jury's still out on that one, no?

An accounting trick.

I see. How about the Royalla solar farm?

And how about the Big Canberra Battery Project?

Is that an accounting trick too?

So they don't need to be connected to the National grid.

Except they do need to be connected and they are connected.

How gullible are you.

6 metre freediver and ACT Battery karnal are getting quite desperate.
They swallowed the false narrative.
Time to vomit it back up and restore health

Drill baby drill

No no, you were asked if the solar farms and batteries are a trick.

We'll need your answer.

Chop chop.

Back to top

IP Logged

freediver

Gold Member

Offline

www.ozpolitic.com

Posts: 52794
At my desk.

Re: the gullibility of climate 'sceptics'
Reply #119 - Today at 12:05pm

aquascoot wrote Today at 11:35am:

freediver wrote Today at 10:55am:

aquascoot wrote on Mar 10^th, 2026 at 1:08pm:

We all remember al gores map of florida , completely under water by 2014.

Can you show us the map Scoot?

aquascoot wrote Today at 10:44am:

And the useful idiots swallow it.

How Gullible Cheesy

Indeed.

6 m says Al gores, in the near future.
And the gullible believe him.

Do the gullible useful idiots believe that is what he said? Can you quote him? Just to prove that you are not one of the gullible useful idiots?

And can you show us the map Scoot?

Back to top

People who can't distinguish between etymology and entomology bug me in ways I cannot put into words.

IP Logged