Frank wrote on Apr 1
st, 2026 at 12:37pm:
An important and obvious point which nevertheless needs to be repeated for the comlletely Gretafied Sads of this world.
What drives away investment from Australia are the regulations and govenment policies they and their ilk demand.
There is no energy self-sufficiency, no domestic merchant navy, no value-added resource industry, no high tech manufacturing, no nuclear industry, no high level skills and education sector etc, because of government regulations, policies and constraints.
"Regulation drives everything away" is one of those slogans that sounds convincing right up until you look at what actually happened.
Australia didn't lose refining capacity because regulation made it impossible to operate. We lost it because policy settings handed the entire sector over to global market logic, where the only thing that matters is short-term profitability. In other words, the lack of regulations.
And in that environment, local refining was always going to lose.
Why run ageing, smaller-scale facilities here when you can import cheaper refined fuel from massive overseas refineries operating at a scale we simply don't match? The "market" did exactly what it's supposed to do, it optimised for cost, not resilience.
That's how we ended up dependent on imports, with what's left of domestic capacity hanging by a thread at places like Ampol Lytton Refinery and Viva Energy Geelong Refinery.
Now fast forward to a world where geopolitical instability actually matters again thanks to Trump lurching into conflict with Iran, which has threatened supply routes and spiked global prices overnight, and suddenly that "efficient" system looks a lot like a strategic vulnerability.
This is the part the "regulation is bad" crowd never grapple with:
If you want sovereign capability, whether that's fuel security, manufacturing, or anything else, you don't get it by stripping everything back and hoping the market will just
decide to maintain unprofitable but critical infrastructure out of goodwill.
You get it through:
- regulation
- subsidies
- or direct government involvement
In other words, deliberate policy choices.
You can argue about how much and what kind, but pretending regulation is the reason we don't have these industries ignores the reality that in key cases, it's the absence of intervention that hollowed them out in the first place.
You don't get to demand "energy self-sufficiency" while also demanding the exact conditions that make it uneconomic to maintain.