Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 
Send Topic Print
Petrol could hit $3 per litre (Read 3619 times)
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 7183
Gender: male
Re: Petrol could hit $3 per litre
Reply #210 - Yesterday at 3:58pm
 
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 3:49pm:
tallowood wrote Yesterday at 3:42pm:
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 3:33pm:
The thing is -
Don didn't even get his own Congress to approve it -
he's acting above the law - he's a loose canon.




Quote:
The Senate rejected a resolution Wednesday to block President Donald Trump from ordering further strikes on Iran, declining to halt a war that Trump started without the consent of Congress.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/03/04/senate-iran-war-powers-vote/




Paywalled site /  link.

I can't read it.


How To Access ANY Paywalled Article For Free in 2025 (13 Methods That Actually Work)

Back to top
 

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 117847
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Petrol could hit $3 per litre
Reply #211 - Yesterday at 4:06pm
 
Dear Tallow,
many blessings -

if you link a paywalled site just copy and paste
the guts of it for us to read.     Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 7183
Gender: male
Re: Petrol could hit $3 per litre
Reply #212 - Yesterday at 4:23pm
 
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 4:06pm:
Dear Tallow,
many blessings -

if you link a paywalled site just copy and paste
the guts of it for us to read.     Roll Eyes


This is very short article so I took screen shot.
...
Back to top
 

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי
 
IP Logged
 
Daves2017
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3110
Gender: male
Re: Petrol could hit $3 per litre
Reply #213 - Yesterday at 4:26pm
 
Jasin wrote on Mar 10th, 2026 at 4:27pm:
Thank god this forum has Sophia & Aquarius ♒



Personally I believe intelligent and rational, reasonable people with a personality should be banned immediately.

So that just means that they are gone.

Cheesy
Back to top
 

The Australian Labor Party- once the workers party but now the Islamic party!
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 117847
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Petrol could hit $3 per litre
Reply #214 - Yesterday at 4:35pm
 
tallowood wrote Yesterday at 4:23pm:
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 4:06pm:
Dear Tallow,
many blessings -

if you link a paywalled site just copy and paste
the guts of it for us to read.     Roll Eyes


This is very short article so I took screen shot.
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/640x480q70/924/pNBv3l.png



Stuff the Senate -

Trump should have gone straight to Congress -
he is using tricks to avoid scrutiny.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20138
Gender: male
Re: Petrol could hit $3 per litre
Reply #215 - Yesterday at 4:39pm
 
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 4:35pm:
Trump should have gone straight to Congress -



Like Truman and then Kennedy. Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 55829
Gender: male
Re: Petrol could hit $3 per litre
Reply #216 - Yesterday at 4:42pm
 
We used to have a good number of female members here. Some have passed on sadly.
Sophia and Aquarius have been awesome for the forum.
...unlike Karnal (FD, Melanie's Purse, etc) and Proud Gay Aussie who try dismally to convince us they do a better job in the feminine way.
There is another gay here who doesn't need to act or antagonise for victimhood and is respected for it.
I forgot Buzzanji but he occasionally appears for short periods. He's ok, he's not a slimy.

More 'real' women here would be good.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 55829
Gender: male
Re: Petrol could hit $3 per litre
Reply #217 - Yesterday at 4:43pm
 
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 4:35pm:
tallowood wrote Yesterday at 4:23pm:
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 4:06pm:
Dear Tallow,
many blessings -

if you link a paywalled site just copy and paste
the guts of it for us to read.     Roll Eyes


This is very short article so I took screen shot.
https://imagizer.imageshack.com/v2/640x480q70/924/pNBv3l.png



Stuff the Senate -

Trump should have gone straight to Congress -
he is using tricks to avoid scrutiny.

Trump just throws it back at the corrupt Demo-rats
"Anything you can do, I can do better"
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Daves2017
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3110
Gender: male
Re: Petrol could hit $3 per litre
Reply #218 - Yesterday at 4:56pm
 
I have returned from my work trip and I can report that there is no fuel issue other then price gouging that our government agents ACCC will do nothing about.

I find it interesting that community with nearly zero public transport are the first to run out of fuel.

However cities with plenty of public transportation have plenty of fuel at a reasonable price?

This might be okay now.

But once regional Australia can’t fuel their tractors to harvest our summer crops nor have diesel to think about planting winter crops ?



Think about it.

Government needs to step up and explain clearly how we can access our 90 day supply store in America?

Angus Taylor signed off on it but apparently Chris Bowen can’t communicate how our country  emergency management with the the USA works?

And our main stream media are too drunk to even understand it’s a question that needs answering 🥳

Hi  alcoholic suffering media people.

I know you are reading this. Have another glass of wine 🤪
Back to top
 

The Australian Labor Party- once the workers party but now the Islamic party!
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 55829
Gender: male
Re: Petrol could hit $3 per litre
Reply #219 - Yesterday at 4:58pm
 
Yes. There is no adequate public transport in Rural.
It should have priority over Cities.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Sophia
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 9492
Re: Petrol could hit $3 per litre
Reply #220 - Yesterday at 6:23pm
 
There are now more service stations around our area void of selling diesel.
Petrol only is for sale at $2.35 litre. And gas is .89 c
Two weeks ago I filled up for $1.54 litre.

And all I see is Albo’s face trying to give an almost comical “don’t panic” vibe.
When the government says don’t panic…. Everyone better stack up of dry foods and canned products and lastly….toilet paper!
Once truckers can’t get diesel to deliver goods to supermarkets, then what happens to supermarket shelves?
Oh my spidey senses are telling me it’s a repeat of how COVID lockdown stripped supermarket shelves is going to happen…. how long before this war ends? Iran is bombing any transport sailing into the gulf where all the refineries are.
Is it true? We only have 2 refineries left in Oz?

Back to top
 

If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand.

Milton Friedman
 
IP Logged
 
Sophia
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 9492
Re: Petrol could hit $3 per litre
Reply #221 - Yesterday at 6:44pm
 
Jasin wrote Yesterday at 4:42pm:
We used to have a good number of female members here. Some have passed on sadly.
Sophia and Aquarius have been awesome for the forum.
...unlike Karnal (FD, Melanie's Purse, etc) and Proud Gay Aussie who try dismally to convince us they do a better job in the feminine way.
There is another gay here who doesn't need to act or antagonise for victimhood and is respected for it.
I forgot Buzzanji but he occasionally appears for short periods. He's ok, he's not a slimy.

More 'real' women here would be good.


I had thought of that and I do miss them  Cry
I am getting on in age too but I will try my best to be around with sane mind and able typing as long as possible.  Smiley
Cods was very good and I occasionally had gone back in archives to read her comments. She was excellent debater and I just like reading what the other females from past had to say.
It’s a sisterhood thing. Funny enough it was international woman’s day earlier this week, so your thoughts of past (and present ) female contributors on a forum were quite apt.

Back to top
 

If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand.

Milton Friedman
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 117847
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Petrol could hit $3 per litre
Reply #222 - Yesterday at 7:59pm
 
lee wrote Yesterday at 4:39pm:
Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 4:35pm:
Trump should have gone straight to Congress -



Like Truman and then Kennedy. Wink


AI:

Neither President Harry S. Truman nor President John F. Kennedy obtained a formal declaration of war or specific, pre-authorization from Congress for their major military involvements in Korea and Vietnam, respectively. Instead, they utilized executive power, acting under broader, existing, or international authorizations, which established precedents for later presidential war-making powers.



Harry S. Truman (Korean War, 1950–1953)
No Formal Declaration: Truman did not ask Congress for a declaration of war, characterizing the conflict instead as a "police action" under the auspices of the United Nations.


UN and Executive Authority: Truman committed U.S. air, ground, and naval forces based on UN Security Council resolutions calling for assistance to South Korea.


Congressional Support: While not passing a formal declaration, Congress generally supported the intervention, including voting to extend the draft to support the effort. However, the lack of formal, explicit authorization was criticized at the time.


John F. Kennedy (Vietnam War, 1961–1963)
Advisors and Counterinsurgency: Kennedy significantly increased the number of U.S. military "advisors" in South Vietnam from approximately 1,000 to over 15,000 by late 1963.


Executive Action: These deployments were done through executive orders and memoranda (such as NSAM 263) rather than congressional authorization.


No Combat Authorization: While Kennedy authorized a more "visible and hazardous role," he maintained that U.S. personnel were there to train, advise, and support, not to engage in direct combat. The formal authorization for direct, large-scale combat (the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution) did not occur until 1964, after his death.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 55829
Gender: male
Re: Petrol could hit $3 per litre
Reply #223 - Yesterday at 8:02pm
 
Sophia wrote Yesterday at 6:44pm:
Jasin wrote Yesterday at 4:42pm:
We used to have a good number of female members here. Some have passed on sadly.
Sophia and Aquarius have been awesome for the forum.
...unlike Karnal (FD, Melanie's Purse, etc) and Proud Gay Aussie who try dismally to convince us they do a better job in the feminine way.
There is another gay here who doesn't need to act or antagonise for victimhood and is respected for it.
I forgot Buzzanji but he occasionally appears for short periods. He's ok, he's not a slimy.

More 'real' women here would be good.


I had thought of that and I do miss them  Cry
I am getting on in age too but I will try my best to be around with sane mind and able typing as long as possible.  Smiley
Cods was very good and I occasionally had gone back in archives to read her comments. She was excellent debater and I just like reading what the other females from past had to say.
It’s a sisterhood thing. Funny enough it was international woman’s day earlier this week, so your thoughts of past (and present ) female contributors on a forum were quite apt.


Well, you know I'm psychic.  Cheesy
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 55829
Gender: male
Re: Petrol could hit $3 per litre
Reply #224 - Yesterday at 8:05pm
 
Sophia wrote Yesterday at 6:23pm:
There are now more service stations around our area void of selling diesel.
Petrol only is for sale at $2.35 litre. And gas is .89 c
Two weeks ago I filled up for $1.54 litre.

And all I see is Albo’s face trying to give an almost comical “don’t panic” vibe.
When the government says don’t panic…. Everyone better stack up of dry foods and canned products and lastly….toilet paper!
Once truckers can’t get diesel to deliver goods to supermarkets, then what happens to supermarket shelves?
Oh my spidey senses are telling me it’s a repeat of how COVID lockdown stripped supermarket shelves is going to happen…. how long before this war ends? Iran is bombing any transport sailing into the gulf where all the refineries are.
Is it true? We only have 2 refineries left in Oz?


Remember when petrol first got up to $2+ ltr years ago.
And lots of snazzy 4x4s and other big vehicle petrol guzzlers were on the side of roads and strips FOR SALE.
I guess they haven't learned.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 13 14 15 16 
Send Topic Print