|
Yadda
|
"A war never ends by one side declaring victory,
but by one side admitting defeat."
- Ahmad Shah Massoud Donald and his team would be well advised to be aware [themselves], of the deep strategic meaning [to the ISLAMIST], of the Arabic word Hudna. To the militant ISLAMIST, their word Hudna, 'translates' as a strategic masterpiece, for the times in war, when the moslem force encounters a stronger 'infidel' enemy in battle. "A hudna (meaning "calm" or "quiet") is a truce or armistice.[1]
It is sometimes translated as "cease-fire"." - wiki Quote:
Raymond Ibrahim: "Islam's Doctrines of Deception"
Nov 10, 2008
By Raymond Ibrahim
....... “In the Muslim community, holy war [jihad] is a religious duty, because of the universalism of the Muslim mission and the obligation to convert everybody to Islam either by persuasion or by force.
The other religious groups did not have a universal mission, and the holy war was not a religious duty for them, save only for purposes of defense…
But Islam is under obligation to gain power over other nations.”
This concept is highlighted by the fact that, based on the ten year treaty of Hudaibiya, ratified between Muhammad and his Quraish opponents in Mecca, ten years is, theoretically, the maximum amount of time Muslims can be at peace with infidels.
Based on Muhammad’s example of breaking the treaty after two years, (by citing a Quraish infraction),
the sole function of the “peace-treaty” (hudna)
is to buy weakened Muslims time to regroup before going on the offensive once more.
Incidentally, Muhammad is quoted in the Hadith saying,
“If I take an oath and later find something else better,
I do what is better
and break my oath.”
Is this what former PLO leader and Nobel Peace Prize winner, Yasser Arafat meant when, after negotiating a peace treaty criticized by Muslims as conceding too much to Israel, said in a mosque,
“I see this agreement as being no more than the agreement signed between our Prophet Muhammad and the Quraish in Mecca”?
What of Hamas, who on several occasions has made it clear that its ultimate aspiration is to see Israel destroyed. Under what context would it want to initiate a “temporary” peace with the Jewish state? When Osama bin Laden offered the U.S. a truce, stressing that “We [Muslims] are a people that Allah has forbidden from double-crossing and lying,” what was his ultimate intention? These are all clear instances of
Muslims feigning friendliness simply in order to buy time to strengthen.
Most recently, a new Islamic group associated with Hamas called Jaysh al-Umma (Islam’s army), stated clearly, "Muslims all over the world are obliged to fight the Israelis and the infidels until only Islam rules the earth.”
Realizing their slip, they quickly “clarified”:
“We say that the world will not live in peace as long as the blood of Muslims continues to be shed.”"
Raymond Ibrahim: How Circumstance Dictates Islamic Behavior
Jan 18, 2012
By Raymond Ibrahim
......Burhami is referring to the famous Mecca/Medina division:
when Muhammad was weak and outnumbered in his early Mecca period,
he preached peace
and made pacts with infidels ;
when he became strong in the Medina period, he preached war and went on the offensive.
This dichotomy—preach peace when weak, wage war when strong—has been instructive to Muslim leaders.....
|
Forum
Pages: 
