Dirty Paki Khunt wrote Yesterday at 7:14pm:


The Granuiad peddling a Greens enquiry. How non-Sky misinformation!


1.1 This inquiry was conducted in a way which proved that it was not about a genuine effort to improve the accuracy of public dialogue but, instead, it was an attempt to bully and cajole people into silence. I have never seen a greater abuse of the Senate’s purpose. Our Parliament should be the vehicle through which the people can challenge and critique the Government. Instead, with a Labor-Green majority in the Senate, this inquiry became the vehicle through which the politicians criticised the people.

1.2The way our system works is if things are not working, and they are clearly not working at the moment, then the people get to elect new politicians. The way Labor and Green politicians conducted themselves in this inquiry showed that they would like to elect a new people.

1.3There was an in-built ignorance in this inquiry about what is the nature of truth. This inquiry was conducted on the premise that there are certain inviolable truths about the workings of our planet, the precise impact of the burning of fossil fuels and even the cost of different energy technologies. But there was no attempt to establish how we know these things. Apart from a naïve repetition of the tired phrase ‘trust the science’, there was little interest in understanding what science is.

1.4Science is the investigation of the workings of our natural world. Science, like the natural world itself, is constantly changing. Understanding how we know about the natural world is not science, it is a branch of philosophy or, in technical terms, epistemology. This discipline traces its origins back to Plato’s Apology in which he quotes Socrates as saying that:

The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing.

1.5Unfortunately, this inquiry was conducted with the ignorant assumption that the Government knows everything, and the Science leaves no question unanswered. However, what marks science apart from many other academic disciplines, say mathematics, is that the conclusions are constantly changing. Only a fool would posit that today’s scientific ‘truths’ will remain the same in a century’s time.

The rest is here.

Here

And here

Frank wrote Yesterday at 10:33pm:


He's posting the thoughts of butthurt One Nation senators, Lee.

Do you get them in WA?

The US military reported the destruction of command centers, air defense systems, missile and UAV launchers, and Iranian Coast Guard infrastructure.

Oh, dear.

What will Donald do now?

Iran tells Houthis to close Red Sea gateway if US hits power network, sources say

Quote:


Quote:


Don't forget - none of this would be happening if Trump hadn't started his illegal two week "excursion" four and a half months ago.

Quote:


everybody now

Saudi Attacks Yemen's Sanaa Airport To Stop Iran Plane From Landing Amid Gulf Tension?


Houthis Begin Revenge

tallowood wrote Today at 9:57am:


Today?

Impossible.

Iran's military capability was "completely and totally obliterated on day one of the war".

The war that isn't a war, that is.

It's an excursion, but it's over now.

And the US won the war on day one, but don't call it a war.

Anyway, there's an MOU and a ceasefire.

Carl D wrote Today at 11:48am:


You are entitled to an opinion but it is irrelevant.

Frank wrote Today at 9:39am:


Oh?

There you go, Lee. The old boy thinks Canavan is not One Nation.

Lucky we don't let these types vote, eh?

SEND THEM BACK !!!