Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 71 72 73 74 75 ... 79
Send Topic Print
Iran what next? (Read 49732 times)
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 8469
Gender: male
pecca touched by Trump
Reply #1080 - Jul 14th, 2026 at 4:23pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 13th, 2026 at 7:21pm:
Everything - and I mean absolutely everything - he touches turns to crap.


Grin

Back to top
 

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי
 
IP Logged
 
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 8469
Gender: male
Re: Iran what next?
Reply #1081 - Jul 14th, 2026 at 4:29pm
 
In the Iranian city of Mashhad, during a farewell ceremony for Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, unidentified individuals opened fire on security guards. Two fighters from the Basij militia, part of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, were killed in the attack. Initially, the media portrayed the incident as a domestic dispute. However, several days later, the IRGC declared it a targeted attack. The military promised to find those responsible.

No one has claimed responsibility for the attack.

...

Back to top
 

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 154202
Gender: male
Re: The Islamic Republic of Japan - what next?
Reply #1082 - Jul 14th, 2026 at 4:36pm
 
tallowood wrote on Jul 14th, 2026 at 4:29pm:
In the Iranian city of Mashhad, ...


Surely you mean the Islamic Republic of Japan's city.

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 8469
Gender: male
Re: pecca touched by Trump
Reply #1083 - Jul 14th, 2026 at 4:49pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 13th, 2026 at 7:21pm:
Everything - and I mean absolutely everything - he touches turns to crap.


Grin


Back to top
 

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי
 
IP Logged
 
Dirty Paki Khunt
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 103221
Re: The Islamic Republic of Japan - what next?
Reply #1084 - Jul 14th, 2026 at 6:51pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 14th, 2026 at 4:16pm:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jul 14th, 2026 at 3:24pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 14th, 2026 at 10:27am:
Carl D wrote on Jul 14th, 2026 at 10:21am:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jul 14th, 2026 at 8:54am:
tallowood wrote on Jul 14th, 2026 at 8:48am:


Open?

Ah.

Just like it was before the rapist started an illegal, unnecessary war.

Thanks for clearing that up.


Doesn't seem like it's too open to me.  Undecided

One dead and eight injured as Tehran targets tankers in Strait of Hormuz, UAE says

Quote:
The UAE says an Indian national is dead and eight others are injured after Iran launched cruise missiles at two tankers in the Strait of Hormuz. It comes after Donald Trump said the US would reinstate its blockade of Iranian ports and become "the guardian" of the Strait.


Well, it may be open as far as Trump and tallowood are concerned but it does seem to be a bit on the dangerous side right now.


Everything Trump touches, he destroys. Everything.

Ships were travelling through the Strait just fine before Trump started his illegal, unnecessary war.

And now that he's started the war again, he can end it for the 43rd (?) time.

They'll have to give him a dozen Peace Prizes.


Yes, but that was then, Greggery. DL's now got two choices: put boots on the ground or surrender to the mullahs.

They'd love nothing more than a US land invasion. Iran has over a million troops, just itching for a war. Invading a territory like Iran would be another Gallipoli - troops would be dessicated.

That leaves option B: full surrender. Here, DL will fire off a post saying how bored he is, he's so over the mullahs. JD can cancel his trip to Pakistan, DL's done. 

If the Cubans are lucky, he'll start complaining about Greenland again.

With the mullahs in charge of the strait, Xi will be free to take the South China sea.

And that, leftards, will be that. DL always said he wanted an end to the global rules-based order, no?

We'll win so much we'll grow tired of winning.


Something tells me Eric and Don Jr will be investing in companies that make body bags.


I think it's a smart move. They've got the space for a few mass graves too.

You could bulldoze a few in with Ivana, she won't care.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 8469
Gender: male
Re: Iran what next?
Reply #1085 - Jul 15th, 2026 at 9:39am
 
Quote:
At 3 p.m. ET today, U.S. Central Command forces began launching an additional round of strikes against Iran to continue degrading Iranian capabilities used to attack commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. The strikes are taking place as American forces prepare to resume the naval blockade against Iranian ports and coastal areas. The blockade goes into effect at 4 p.m. ET.

@U_S_CENTCOM
Back to top
 

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59263
Gender: male
Re: Iran what next?
Reply #1086 - Jul 15th, 2026 at 9:55am
 
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jul 14th, 2026 at 3:24pm:
DL's now got two choices: put boots on the ground or surrender to the mullahs.

They'd love nothing more than a US land invasion. Iran has over a million troops, just itching for a war. Invading a territory like Iran would be another Gallipoli - troops would be dessicated.



Silly paki bollocks, gobber.


Washington needs a strategy directed against the political foundations of the regime itself. This calls for economic warfare, coalition management and sustained military pressure, not another cycle of airstrikes followed by negotiations. In effect, I am arguing that American strategy must force regime change in Iran. It is the only way to achieve the already announced goals of renouncing nuclear weapons, destroying missiles and ending support of terrorist groups.

Here is what I suggest President Trump should do:

1. Order a one-week strategic review focused on how to defeat the IRGC politically, economically and militarily, not merely how to strike Iranian targets. Trump needs to listen to strategic advice and define what victory means before embarking on military operations.

2. Deploy Secretary of State Marco Rubio to talk to the Europeans, listen to their views, understand their needs, and press them to be involved in the Iran operation. Then send Rubio to the Middle East, asking the Saudis and Emiratis to reconcile their differences and support a more definitive resolution of the war.

3. Explain the war’s purpose to the American people in a formal address. This means making it clear the war will last some time and why the IRGC must be removed from power.

4. Take physical control of Iran’s Kharg Island oil terminal. Squeeze harder on sanctions to make sure no money is getting through to the regime in Tehran.

5. Build an international naval coalition to escort ships through the Strait of Hormuz. The US will undoubtedly do the heavy lifting – because only it can –and this may mean some military boots on the ground on Qeshm Island at the top of the Strait.

6. Tell Beijing that if it wants a positive relationship with the US, it must cease overt and covert support for the Iranian regime.

7. Ask the Israelis to participate in military operations designed to destroy the IRGC leadership. This needs to be a central military priority.

To get to this outcome, the US must bring the Iranian economy to its knees, ending the IRGC’s capacity to pay for its war. And the US needs to destroy the IRGC’s leadership, creating at least the potential for other, less radicalised leaders to emerge.

Kharg Island is a vital target because it is the single most important outlet for Iranian oil exports. It needs to be controlled not (as Trump has regularly said) destroyed. It doesn’t need to be forcefully taken, just surrounded and cut off. Control of Kharg gives Trump one asset even the IRGC values.

The toughest military decision would be to occupy part of Qeshm Island at the narrowest part of the Strait of Hormuz. It’s at the centre of IRGC attempts to control shipping. So far, the US has been unable to control Iranian attacks on shipping by using air and sea power alone. Trump needs clarity from military planners about how to deal with this challenge.

Because the Strait of Hormuz is a global economic artery, any successful strategy toward Iran will require allied support, particularly from Europe and the Gulf states. This is the right moment for a serious discussion between allies. The Europeans, with France and the UK in the lead, understand the central importance of the Strait of Hormuz. Rubio needs to gain their support.

A good international citizen like Australia should help too. It is fundamentally in our interests that Trump recover his position and set out a strategy for America and its allies to prevail over Iran.

Whether Trump adopts such a strategy is now the defining question of his presidency. If he does not, Iran’s greatest victory will be showing that the US no longer has the patience to prevail against a determined adversary.

Strategic failure over Iran would absorb what remains of Trump’s presidency, dominate his legacy and undermine America’s position in the world. The President’s downcast mood at the NATO summit suggests he understands what is at stake.

Peter Jennings


Iranian theocracy is the last and most significant obstacle to normalising the ME. After four decades now is the time to sweep it away.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Dirty Paki Khunt
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 103221
Re: Iran what next?
Reply #1087 - Jul 15th, 2026 at 10:59am
 
Frank wrote on Jul 15th, 2026 at 9:55am:
Silly paki bollocks, gobber.


Washington needs a strategy directed against the political foundations of the regime itself. This calls for economic warfare, coalition management and sustained military pressure, not another cycle of airstrikes followed by negotiations. In effect, I am arguing that American strategy must force regime change in Iran. It is the only way to achieve the already announced goals of renouncing nuclear weapons, destroying missiles and ending support of terrorist groups.

Here is what I suggest President Trump should do:

1. Order a one-week strategic review focused on how to defeat the IRGC politically, economically and militarily, not merely how to strike Iranian targets. Trump needs to listen to strategic advice and define what victory means before embarking on military operations.

2. Deploy Secretary of State Marco Rubio to talk to the Europeans, listen to their views, understand their needs, and press them to be involved in the Iran operation. Then send Rubio to the Middle East, asking the Saudis and Emiratis to reconcile their differences and support a more definitive resolution of the war.

3. Explain the war’s purpose to the American people in a formal address. This means making it clear the war will last some time and why the IRGC must be removed from power.

4. Take physical control of Iran’s Kharg Island oil terminal. Squeeze harder on sanctions to make sure no money is getting through to the regime in Tehran.

5. Build an international naval coalition to escort ships through the Strait of Hormuz. The US will undoubtedly do the heavy lifting – because only it can –and this may mean some military boots on the ground on Qeshm Island at the top of the Strait.

6. Tell Beijing that if it wants a positive relationship with the US, it must cease overt and covert support for the Iranian regime.

7. Ask the Israelis to participate in military operations designed to destroy the IRGC leadership. This needs to be a central military priority.

To get to this outcome, the US must bring the Iranian economy to its knees, ending the IRGC’s capacity to pay for its war. And the US needs to destroy the IRGC’s leadership, creating at least the potential for other, less radicalised leaders to emerge.

Kharg Island is a vital target because it is the single most important outlet for Iranian oil exports. It needs to be controlled not (as Trump has regularly said) destroyed. It doesn’t need to be forcefully taken, just surrounded and cut off. Control of Kharg gives Trump one asset even the IRGC values.

The toughest military decision would be to occupy part of Qeshm Island at the narrowest part of the Strait of Hormuz. It’s at the centre of IRGC attempts to control shipping. So far, the US has been unable to control Iranian attacks on shipping by using air and sea power alone. Trump needs clarity from military planners about how to deal with this challenge.

Because the Strait of Hormuz is a global economic artery, any successful strategy toward Iran will require allied support, particularly from Europe and the Gulf states. This is the right moment for a serious discussion between allies. The Europeans, with France and the UK in the lead, understand the central importance of the Strait of Hormuz. Rubio needs to gain their support.

A good international citizen like Australia should help too. It is fundamentally in our interests that Trump recover his position and set out a strategy for America and its allies to prevail over Iran.

Whether Trump adopts such a strategy is now the defining question of his presidency. If he does not, Iran’s greatest victory will be showing that the US no longer has the patience to prevail against a determined adversary.

Strategic failure over Iran would absorb what remains of Trump’s presidency, dominate his legacy and undermine America’s position in the world. The President’s downcast mood at the NATO summit suggests he understands what is at stake.

Peter Jennings


Iranian theocracy is the last and most significant obstacle to normalising the ME. After four decades now is the time to sweep it away.


Oh, I see. A strategic, week-long review, is it?

Let's try to get this one right, old boy. You want DL to sit in meetings, listen to really boring stuff and stay awake for a whole week.

You want him to get Marco to consult with allies, make friends and build coalitions. You want him issuing demands to Xi, who totally freaks him out, and Bibi, who's probably got more kompromat on him than Vlad.

And after all this, you want him to follow a strategic direction and stick to it.

How do you think that's going to work out, old boy?

There are no "less radicalized" IRGC leaders. The more leaders and schoolgirls he kills, the more radical they get. Any Iranian who bends over for Uncle is going to get strung up on a crane. The more he bombs, the more he violates their territory, the more he sends out deranged all-caps threats, the greater the risk to any Iranian moderates left.

The only way the US is going to fix this mess is regime change. The only solution the US has is to take him out, apologize profusely and give the mullahs whatever they want.

It may not happen overnight but it will happen, no?

Always absolutely never ever.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Dirty Paki Khunt
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 103221
Re: Iran what next?
Reply #1088 - Jul 15th, 2026 at 11:03am
 
Frank wrote on Jul 15th, 2026 at 9:55am:
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jul 14th, 2026 at 3:24pm:
DL's now got two choices: put boots on the ground or surrender to the mullahs.

They'd love nothing more than a US land invasion. Iran has over a million troops, just itching for a war. Invading a territory like Iran would be another Gallipoli - troops would be dessicated.



Silly paki bollocks, gobber.


Washington needs a strategy directed against the political foundations of the regime itself. This calls for economic warfare, coalition management and sustained military pressure, not another cycle of airstrikes followed by negotiations. In effect, I am arguing that American strategy must force regime change in Iran. It is the only way to achieve the already announced goals of renouncing nuclear weapons, destroying missiles and ending support of terrorist groups.

Here is what I suggest President Trump should do:

1. Order a one-week strategic review focused on how to defeat the IRGC politically, economically and militarily, not merely how to strike Iranian targets. Trump needs to listen to strategic advice and define what victory means before embarking on military operations.

2. Deploy Secretary of State Marco Rubio to talk to the Europeans, listen to their views, understand their needs, and press them to be involved in the Iran operation. Then send Rubio to the Middle East, asking the Saudis and Emiratis to reconcile their differences and support a more definitive resolution of the war.

3. Explain the war’s purpose to the American people in a formal address. This means making it clear the war will last some time and why the IRGC must be removed from power.

4. Take physical control of Iran’s Kharg Island oil terminal. Squeeze harder on sanctions to make sure no money is getting through to the regime in Tehran.

5. Build an international naval coalition to escort ships through the Strait of Hormuz. The US will undoubtedly do the heavy lifting – because only it can –and this may mean some military boots on the ground on Qeshm Island at the top of the Strait.

6. Tell Beijing that if it wants a positive relationship with the US, it must cease overt and covert support for the Iranian regime.

7. Ask the Israelis to participate in military operations designed to destroy the IRGC leadership. This needs to be a central military priority.

To get to this outcome, the US must bring the Iranian economy to its knees, ending the IRGC’s capacity to pay for its war. And the US needs to destroy the IRGC’s leadership, creating at least the potential for other, less radicalised leaders to emerge.

Kharg Island is a vital target because it is the single most important outlet for Iranian oil exports. It needs to be controlled not (as Trump has regularly said) destroyed. It doesn’t need to be forcefully taken, just surrounded and cut off. Control of Kharg gives Trump one asset even the IRGC values.

The toughest military decision would be to occupy part of Qeshm Island at the narrowest part of the Strait of Hormuz. It’s at the centre of IRGC attempts to control shipping. So far, the US has been unable to control Iranian attacks on shipping by using air and sea power alone. Trump needs clarity from military planners about how to deal with this challenge.

Because the Strait of Hormuz is a global economic artery, any successful strategy toward Iran will require allied support, particularly from Europe and the Gulf states. This is the right moment for a serious discussion between allies. The Europeans, with France and the UK in the lead, understand the central importance of the Strait of Hormuz. Rubio needs to gain their support.

A good international citizen like Australia should help too. It is fundamentally in our interests that Trump recover his position and set out a strategy for America and its allies to prevail over Iran.

Whether Trump adopts such a strategy is now the defining question of his presidency. If he does not, Iran’s greatest victory will be showing that the US no longer has the patience to prevail against a determined adversary.

Strategic failure over Iran would absorb what remains of Trump’s presidency, dominate his legacy and undermine America’s position in the world. The President’s downcast mood at the NATO summit suggests he understands what is at stake.

Peter Jennings


Iranian theocracy is the last and most significant obstacle to normalising the ME. After four decades now is the time to sweep it away.


Sorry, I missed this one.

Sorry, gang, we invaded Iran to blow the Epstein files off the fake news. But that's okay, we're now going to implement a strategy.

That could work, no?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 59263
Gender: male
Re: Iran what next?
Reply #1089 - Jul 15th, 2026 at 11:50am
 
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jul 15th, 2026 at 10:59am:
Frank wrote on Jul 15th, 2026 at 9:55am:
Silly paki bollocks, gobber.


Washington needs a strategy directed against the political foundations of the regime itself. This calls for economic warfare, coalition management and sustained military pressure, not another cycle of airstrikes followed by negotiations. In effect, I am arguing that American strategy must force regime change in Iran. It is the only way to achieve the already announced goals of renouncing nuclear weapons, destroying missiles and ending support of terrorist groups.

Here is what I suggest President Trump should do:

1. Order a one-week strategic review focused on how to defeat the IRGC politically, economically and militarily, not merely how to strike Iranian targets. Trump needs to listen to strategic advice and define what victory means before embarking on military operations.

2. Deploy Secretary of State Marco Rubio to talk to the Europeans, listen to their views, understand their needs, and press them to be involved in the Iran operation. Then send Rubio to the Middle East, asking the Saudis and Emiratis to reconcile their differences and support a more definitive resolution of the war.

3. Explain the war’s purpose to the American people in a formal address. This means making it clear the war will last some time and why the IRGC must be removed from power.

4. Take physical control of Iran’s Kharg Island oil terminal. Squeeze harder on sanctions to make sure no money is getting through to the regime in Tehran.

5. Build an international naval coalition to escort ships through the Strait of Hormuz. The US will undoubtedly do the heavy lifting – because only it can –and this may mean some military boots on the ground on Qeshm Island at the top of the Strait.

6. Tell Beijing that if it wants a positive relationship with the US, it must cease overt and covert support for the Iranian regime.

7. Ask the Israelis to participate in military operations designed to destroy the IRGC leadership. This needs to be a central military priority.

To get to this outcome, the US must bring the Iranian economy to its knees, ending the IRGC’s capacity to pay for its war. And the US needs to destroy the IRGC’s leadership, creating at least the potential for other, less radicalised leaders to emerge.

Kharg Island is a vital target because it is the single most important outlet for Iranian oil exports. It needs to be controlled not (as Trump has regularly said) destroyed. It doesn’t need to be forcefully taken, just surrounded and cut off. Control of Kharg gives Trump one asset even the IRGC values.

The toughest military decision would be to occupy part of Qeshm Island at the narrowest part of the Strait of Hormuz. It’s at the centre of IRGC attempts to control shipping. So far, the US has been unable to control Iranian attacks on shipping by using air and sea power alone. Trump needs clarity from military planners about how to deal with this challenge.

Because the Strait of Hormuz is a global economic artery, any successful strategy toward Iran will require allied support, particularly from Europe and the Gulf states. This is the right moment for a serious discussion between allies. The Europeans, with France and the UK in the lead, understand the central importance of the Strait of Hormuz. Rubio needs to gain their support.

A good international citizen like Australia should help too. It is fundamentally in our interests that Trump recover his position and set out a strategy for America and its allies to prevail over Iran.

Whether Trump adopts such a strategy is now the defining question of his presidency. If he does not, Iran’s greatest victory will be showing that the US no longer has the patience to prevail against a determined adversary.

Strategic failure over Iran would absorb what remains of Trump’s presidency, dominate his legacy and undermine America’s position in the world. The President’s downcast mood at the NATO summit suggests he understands what is at stake.

Peter Jennings


Iranian theocracy is the last and most significant obstacle to normalising the ME. After four decades now is the time to sweep it away.


Oh, I see. A strategic, week-long review, is it?

Let's try to get this one right, old boy. You want DL to sit in meetings, listen to really boring stuff and stay awake for a whole week.

You want him to get Marco to consult with allies, make friends and build coalitions. You want him issuing demands to Xi, who totally freaks him out, and Bibi, who's probably got more kompromat on him than Vlad.

And after all this, you want him to follow a strategic direction and stick to it.

How do you think that's going to work out, old boy?

There are no "less radicalized" IRGC leaders. The more leaders and schoolgirls he kills, the more radical they get. Any Iranian who bends over for Uncle is going to get strung up on a crane. The more he bombs, the more he violates their territory, the more he sends out deranged all-caps threats, the greater the risk to any Iranian moderates left.

The only way the US is going to fix this mess is regime change. The only solution the US has is to take him out, apologize profusely and give the mullahs whatever they want.

It may not happen overnight but it will happen, no?

Always absolutely never ever.


You forgot to say inshallah and Allahu akhbar, silly old pak
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Dirty Paki Khunt
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 103221
Re: Iran what next?
Reply #1090 - Jul 15th, 2026 at 2:23pm
 
No no, DL already said that, dear. It was back on Easter Sunday, do you recall?

Quote:
Tuesday will be Power Plant Day, and Bridge Day, all wrapped up in one, in Iran. There will be nothing like it!!!
Open the buggerkin’ Strait, you crazy bastards, or you’ll be living in Hell - JUST WATCH! Praise be to Allah. President Donald J Trump.


The one thing you're missing, crucial to anybody moving on from here, is the admission: president Donald J Trump has created the biggest foreign debacle ever.

This is far worse than Afghanistan and Iraq, both of which had Congressional approval and, after the UN voted it down, a Coalition of the Willing.

This is far worse than Korea, Guatemala, Panama or any other excursion the US has taken part in over the past century. It's even worse than the covert action that started this business to begin with: the CIA-led overthrow of Mosaddegh, the first democratically-elected Iranian PM, in 1951.

This one's up there with Nam, but even that debacle had Congressional authorisation, a coalition of allies and an invite from the Diem regime in South Nam.

Until the US owns up to its hubris, there can be no meaningful coalitions, deals, partnerships or strategizing. No one's going to work with your DL's minions on this one. Even the minions are just playing along, standing behind the Resolute Desk in their suits, their hands covering their balls.

How could Little Marco possibly work constructively with the Gulf Arabs or European allies? Your DL's undermined and sabotaged every US alliance in the world. The only workable partnerships are the countries the Trump Org's doing business in, like Kazakhstan.

Even the Saudis and Qataris have soured. DL won't be getting any free planes from now on, I can assure you. He's sent the entire Gulf broke.

Europe's not talking. Sanchez and Meloni are expressing their outright contempt. As for us, We followed Uncle into Iraq, Afghanistan, Nam and Korea, but not even obsequious old Oz is touching this one.

The only way to start on a solution is to fess up. We totally stuffed up, Uncle has to say. We're sorry

We killed the mullahs. We killed the schoolgirls. We declared war on Iran and caused the biggest oil shock in history.

Until the Septics say that, everything in your silly old seven-point plan is mere wishful thinking.

Allah Uakbar, innit.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Jul 15th, 2026 at 3:06pm by Dirty Paki Khunt »  
 
IP Logged
 
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 8469
Gender: male
Re: Iran what next?
Reply #1091 - Jul 15th, 2026 at 2:26pm
 
tallowood wrote on Jul 15th, 2026 at 9:39am:
Quote:
At 3 p.m. ET today, U.S. Central Command forces began launching an additional round of strikes against Iran to continue degrading Iranian capabilities used to attack commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. The strikes are taking place as American forces prepare to resume the naval blockade against Iranian ports and coastal areas. The blockade goes into effect at 4 p.m. ET.

@U_S_CENTCOM



...

...
Back to top
 

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי
 
IP Logged
 
Dirty Paki Khunt
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 103221
Re: Iran what next?
Reply #1092 - Jul 15th, 2026 at 2:32pm
 
tallowood wrote on Jul 15th, 2026 at 2:26pm:
tallowood wrote on Jul 15th, 2026 at 9:39am:
Quote:
At 3 p.m. ET today, U.S. Central Command forces began launching an additional round of strikes against Iran to continue degrading Iranian capabilities used to attack commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. The strikes are taking place as American forces prepare to resume the naval blockade against Iranian ports and coastal areas. The blockade goes into effect at 4 p.m. ET.

@U_S_CENTCOM


https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img921/5743/lFIKC5.gif

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/4512/4dfc9g.gif


The only ones jerking off to your AI porn are the bots, dear.

We decide who comes to our country and the manner in which they come, no?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 8469
Gender: male
Re: Iran what next?
Reply #1093 - Jul 15th, 2026 at 2:49pm
 
Dirty Paki Khunt wrote on Jul 15th, 2026 at 2:32pm:
tallowood wrote on Jul 15th, 2026 at 2:26pm:
tallowood wrote on Jul 15th, 2026 at 9:39am:
Quote:
At 3 p.m. ET today, U.S. Central Command forces began launching an additional round of strikes against Iran to continue degrading Iranian capabilities used to attack commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. The strikes are taking place as American forces prepare to resume the naval blockade against Iranian ports and coastal areas. The blockade goes into effect at 4 p.m. ET.

@U_S_CENTCOM


https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img921/5743/lFIKC5.gif

https://imagizer.imageshack.com/img923/4512/4dfc9g.gif


The only ones jerking off to your AI porn are the bots, dear.

We decide who comes to our country and the manner in which they come, no?


Why are you so butthurt?
Back to top
 

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי
 
IP Logged
 
tallowood
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Израиль Навсегда

Posts: 8469
Gender: male
Re: Iran what next?
Reply #1094 - Jul 15th, 2026 at 2:55pm
 
🇮🇷🇺🇸 The ship sunk by the Iranians

...
Back to top
 

עַם יִשְרָאֵל חַי
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 71 72 73 74 75 ... 79
Send Topic Print