Quote:



Quote:

Bobby. wrote on Mar 9^th, 2026 at 6:19pm:


Fair enough, Australia gets inspected because under the treaties, we are not supposed to have nukes. But why bother with Israel and the US?

Or Israel in particular - is it just because they are Jews?

freediver wrote on Mar 10^th, 2026 at 1:23pm:



Facts:

AI Overview

Countries that restrict or do not fully allow International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspections include North Korea (no access since 2009) and Iran, which has severely limited access, removed inspector credentials, and suspended cooperation in 2025. India, Pakistan, and Israel are not signatories to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and only allow limited, facility-specific safeguards.



Key details regarding IAEA access:


Iran: As of mid-2025, Iran has blocked access to bombed sites, restricted monitoring, and removed inspectors following a censure, leading to a loss of continuous oversight of their nuclear fuel cycle.


North Korea (DPRK): Expelled IAEA inspectors in 2009 and has continued its nuclear program without international monitoring.



Non-NPT States: India, Pakistan, and Israel operate outside the comprehensive safeguards, having never signed the NPT.
Other: Approximately 14 smaller nations have no formal relationship with the IAEA.

4. Non-Member States

A group of 13 UN member states has no official relationship with the IAEA and therefore no standard inspection regime. This
Andorra, Bhutan, Equatorial Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kiribati, Micronesia, Nauru, São Tomé and Príncipe, Solomon Islands, South Sudan, Suriname, Timor-Leste, and Tuvalu

Baronvonrort wrote on Mar 9^th, 2026 at 8:07pm:


Why?

Because Israel is an aggressive Middle Eastern state, currently occupying parts of Lebanon, Jordan and Egypt, is decimating major urban populations in Iran and Lebanon, and its military and PM are at large for crimes against humanity after it killed 24,000 Gazans, caused a famine and bombed a city of two million back to the stone age.

That's why. Excluding Russia, Israel is the most rogue state on the planet. India and Pakistan don't even touch the sides.

Israel won't even acknowledge it has nuclear weapons.

You?

tallowood wrote Yesterday at 3:51pm:


Incorrect. The word "rogue" has roots in medieval France, potentially deriving from "hrogo" (crow), a nickname for a beggar or scoundrel.

Islamic refers to a religion founded by Moh in 610 CE. The two terms have no connection whatsoever.

"Rogue states", in diplomatic parlance, refers to those states that work against the rules-based order, usually in a solitary, aggressive and confrontational stance towards others.

See Israel, Russia, North Korea and the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Three of these states share a military alliance. The US refers to them as "political adversaries".

Since January 2025, the US has signalled its break from the rules-based order to become a rogue state itself. It has joined Israel to declare war against Iran, causing Russia no end of grief.

Iran supplies Russia with drones. North Korea supplies Russia with troops. Russia uses them in its invasion of another former US ally, Ukraine. Recently, Russia provided intelligence to Iran to fight Israel and the US.

As you can see, these military alliances render the term of "rogue state" somewhat redundant. What we now have, in diplomatic nomenclature, is commonly referred to as a world war.

With two recorded world wars in modern history, this marks a third, making it WWIII.

This was the war your DL was elected to prevent. By joining one rogue state in its invasion of another, he has failed to honour a key election promise. When the next US Congress and Senate are sworn in on 20 January 2027, following the mid term elections in October 2026, your DL shall be impeached. Evidence of his corruption and war crimes will be submitted to the US Department of Justice for prosecution.

In all likelihood, this will place the US in a constitutional crisis, with the legislative branch pitted against the executive. The acting prez will be forced to make a choice: whether to prosecute or pardon a former US prez.

The acting prez will need to weigh up the compelling evidence presented: the billions in bribes, DL's orders to kill US and foreign citizens and crimes yet to be revealed at the time of writing.

If JD's previous statements are anything to go by, your DL could be in very hot water indeed. In 2027, the US will be at war on multiple fronts, so any judicial action against the current prez will not be at the top of the acting prez' list of priorities.

Of course, knowing JD's feelings about forever wars and knowing his deep loathing for your DL, he will be under no obligation to save the man. If the history of "rogue" leaders is anything to go by, your DL may just be led out to the South Lawn in the middle of the night and taken out of his misery by his own men.

We'll need to wait and see what happens.