Gordon wrote on Mar 12^th, 2026 at 2:35pm:


Man you find some great clips Gordo 

It's very apparent that Leftism is CO-DEPENDANT upon Terrorism to exist and even Communism.
The ALP and Anus have reluctantly been forced to comply with Trump, grovelling when it matters and they can't squirm out of it. The very same who, when safe in Australia condemn Trump often.

The NLP should miraculously win the next election to offer Trump a more agreeable and efficient support. I have no doubt Great Britain will boot gay Starmer & co out to align better as well.

It's not just a war against Terrorism & Communism. It's a war against Leftism that allows them to exist, as well.

ProudKangaroo wrote on Mar 12^th, 2026 at 10:46am:


Jasin wrote on Mar 12^th, 2026 at 1:15pm:


So it's terrorism?

Is that the reason?

ProudKangaroo wrote Yesterday at 9:20am:


Or, a distraction from the Epstein files as well as an excuse to cancel the mid-terms?   

"So you say during the war, you can't have elections," he said.

"So let me just say, three and a half years from now, so you mean if we happen to be in a war with somebody, no more elections.

"Oh, that's good. I wonder what the fake news is going to say."

Frank wrote Yesterday at 10:07am:


The US has a dictator in the White House.

Trump says Republicans 'should take over the voting' and 'nationalise' US elections

Bobby. wrote on Mar 12^th, 2026 at 2:39pm:


Trump didn't start a war with Iran, he wrecked the global economy. The Strait of Hormuz is blocked, oil prices are spiking, fertiliser shortages are hitting farms, container ships are stranded, and even a massive release from strategic reserves can't undo the chaos he's caused.

Here's the brutal truth: even if he pulled out tomorrow, it's too late. Millions are displaced, thousands dead, supply chains tangled, and food and energy prices are climbing. Trump's "mission accomplished" rallies are a joke, he's left a trail of destruction that ordinary Americans will pay for. This isn't policy. This isn't national security. This is reckless, irreversible damage masquerading as leadership.

But it's not just Americans.  I had assumed that Trump was going to bankrupt the US, but now his damage is destabilising the globe.

We underestimated how dangerous he would be.

ProudKangaroo wrote Yesterday at 10:20am:


In all modesty, I've never underestimated how dangerous he is.

I've always said that he is one of the most evil people on the planet.

And, recently, I've been starting to think that maybe none of this chaos is an accident caused by incompetence.

He knows he's sick and only has a few years left to live.

I believe he might actually be trying to destroy the world on purpose - "If I can't live in this world any more, nobody else should be able to either".

He is a very, very sick man (both mentally and physically) and I wouldn't put anything past him.

Is the war against Iran an evil crime of aggression as per Nuremberg?


Google AI:

Justice Robert H. Jackson, acting as the Chief Counsel for the United States at the Nuremberg Trials,
did argue that the crime of aggression (referred to as "crimes against peace")
was the foundational crime from which all other atrocities stemmed.

In his opening statement on November 21, 1945, Jackson declared that the Nazi conspiracy to wage war was the central crime, which included, or brought in its train, the other crimes—war crimes and crimes against humanity.


Key points regarding Jackson's position:

The "Supreme" Crime: The Nuremberg Tribunal later echoed Jackson's perspective in its judgment, calling aggression the "supreme international crime" because it contains within itself the "accumulated evil of the whole," including all other crimes.
A "Common Plan": Jackson argued that the planning and execution of aggressive war was the "brains and authority back of all the crimes".


Consequences: He maintained that the atrocities committed against individuals and minorities (crimes against humanity) and the violations of the laws of war (war crimes) were direct results of the initial, illegal resort to war.

Jackson's approach focused on the leadership, arguing that without the "evil architecture" of the Nazi planners and their decision to wage an illegal war, the subsequent atrocities would not have occurred.