|
greggerypeccary
|
Frank wrote on Feb 25 th, 2026 at 8:28pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 25 th, 2026 at 8:19pm: Frank wrote on Feb 25 th, 2026 at 8:18pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 25 th, 2026 at 7:50pm: Frank wrote on Feb 25 th, 2026 at 5:19pm: greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 25 th, 2026 at 4:42pm: Oh dear. You really are struggling to come up with anything relevant on this subject. Keep erecting those strawmen, old boy As I said, low-brow union functionary with an education fetish on the basis of your Cert IV in OH&S and all-round, full time dishonest slime ball: Quote:In any case, you 'argumemmt' against the deaath penalty is fallacious. You presume, without any justification, that the premise of your stance is beyond dispute, and then you just bang on and on, no matter what. fallacy /ˈfaləsi/ noun 1. a mistaken belief, especially one based on unsound arguments Word Origin late 15th century (in the sense ‘deception, guile’; gradually superseding Middle English fallace): from Latin fallacia, from fallax, fallac- ‘deceiving’, from fallere ‘deceive’. It's your middle, first and last name - deceptive creep. I think the state-sanctioned, premeditated killing of restrained prisoners is wrong. You don't. Such is life. Is it wrong for the police to shoot dead a criminal who is mudering people, say, in a mass shooting situation? He isn't restrained yet killing him is done, lawfully and nobody kvetches about it. He is shot dead and deserves to be. But capturing him, trying him, convicting him and THEN shooting him is 'wrong' somehow. Correct. See if you can figure out why. You are not standing on undisputed ground, lying creep, that everyone else must figure out. You must explain your disputed grounds. Being educated all the way to Cert iV you should know that much. We aren't all as stupid and dishonest and incoherent as you so do not make assumptions in those directions. Put down the bottle of Jameson, get some sleep, and I'm sure you'll figure it out in the morning.
|