thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 1
st, 2026 at 7:03pm:
you can't even comprehend the answer as given ie "no consensus on it's validity" which you changed (in your ideologically crippled brain) to " possibly NO validity.
So no consensus on its validity mean it is definitely valid in some way?
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 1
st, 2026 at 7:03pm:
Er...MMT posits that taxes - and unique tax benefits - are not required to fund a money issuer.
That was not your argument. You stated that Australian landlords had "unique tax benefits".
thegreatdivide wrote on Mar 1
st, 2026 at 7:03pm:
Careful - you are compounding error upon error; what happened to your research
on the question you asked me to supply (which I dutifully did), for you to test in the AI model of your choice?
No I asked you to do it. You didn't. You were "too busy".

So you haven't proven that AI knows anything, it merely quotes from other web pages. That is not intelligent.
If every model is intelligent why do models get it wrong?
I did ask you your question on Australia's "unique tax benefits", which you have signally failed to do.