Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
NASA Moon Mission by Artemis Rocket. (Read 159 times)
steve9
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 217
Gender: male
NASA Moon Mission by Artemis Rocket.
Feb 22nd, 2026 at 1:06pm
 
     I have posted several readings on Fake Apollo man walked on the moon stories, now getting straight to the point before readers stop reading because readers don’t want to know reality from believing fantasy, Rocket engine exhaust propulsion in a zero atmosphere does not work as though an atmosphere exists similar to earth’s atmosphere.
     Some weight value of fuel equal to opposite reaction propels spacecraft in no atmosphere space, when considering a cannon being fired, cannon ball projectile being propelled watching the cannon propelled backwards, the force propelling cannons in reverse depends on the heavy weight of the projectile being shot out of the cannon.
     Spacecraft entering Earth’s orbit are driven by rocket engine exhaust force momentum created while rocketing in earth’s atmosphere, when entering a no atmosphere orbit the faster rocket speed increased while in an atmosphere to obtain a high altitude, having entered a no atmosphere zone, earth’s gravity slows rocket payloads travelling away from earth’s surface to a speed that allows rocket payloads to travel parallel with earth’s surface, payloads maintain orbit for long periods, all of which speeds (of 14,700 mph and greater) are calculated using doppler effect radar frequency compression and or stretched data.

     Several times comments coming from NASA engineers state ‘spacecraft will need to reach speeds of 25-26,000 miles per hour to have enough momentum to reach the moon’s orbit’ that being stated as ‘3,000 miles per hour’.

     Even if Moon Mission rockets could obtain such 25-26,000 mph speeds while leaving earth’s atmosphere such high speeds which are almost twice normal rocket speeds required to hold objects within earth’s orbits, the moon’s gravity being one sixth that of earth, a moon gravity reach that controls earth’s ocean tides, without any plausible navigation propulsion method the moon’s gravity would pull spacecraft directly into the centre of the moon, spacecraft crashing on the moon surface, that no moon orbit could be obtained.

     The fantasy of leaving the moon’s orbit, spacecraft returning to earth would be more falling back to earth, NASA engineers stating spacecraft would reach earth’s atmosphere at speeds of 24,000 miles per hour. Again I say the gravity of earth which spacecraft cannot navigate (turn) into earth’s orbit as shown by NASA flight path entering and circulating earth in earth’s orbit before splashdown, reality would have 24,000 mph spacecraft speed, spacecraft burning up due to earth’s atmosphere friction with spacecraft outer surface. Even knowing where spacecraft would land would be difficult to calculate.
     Even if spacecraft could somehow enter earth’s orbit, 24,000 mph speeds would allow spacecraft to continue out into space, having exceeded staying in earth’s orbit speeds.

     Most people won’t want to read above statements in fear of being shown how easily they have been fooled, merely believing what they were told, how easily continued lies have been believed. Most people want to believe they’re intelligent, feel intelligent by ignoring all stated reasons moon missions are lies. Such people are all emotional decision makers self-programmed by their simple life, avoiding complex behaviours, self-medicating childhood traumas avoiding any information that required periods of thought. People don’t think people know.

     The number of views, being the few views this post receives can somewhat indicate how people want to go on believing what feels good to believe.

     This somewhat indicates the establishments humorous contempt for common people’s intelligence for common people having no desires to want to think.

steve9
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 118184
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: NASA Moon Mission by Artemis Rocket.
Reply #1 - Feb 22nd, 2026 at 1:40pm
 

Quote:
Rocket engine exhaust propulsion in a zero atmosphere does not work
as though an atmosphere exists similar to earth’s atmosphere.



Steve you need to pass high school science before you make such comments.  Roll Eyes
Your grammar is terrible too - meaningless dribble.
You have just proven that you're a total idiot.



Newton's Third Law of Motion states that for every action (force) in nature,
there is an equal and opposite reaction.
When one object exerts force on another,
the second object instantly exerts an equal force in the opposite direction.
This principle explains how rockets launch, swimmers move, and cars drive.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 15190
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: NASA Moon Mission by Artemis Rocket.
Reply #2 - Feb 22nd, 2026 at 1:56pm
 
Steve to not reply respond as when translate bot to Forum. Not. Reads science to mix state sentence post several times.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
steve9
Full Member
***
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 217
Gender: male
Re: NASA Moon Mission by Artemis Rocket.
Reply #3 - Mar 15th, 2026 at 12:04pm
 
     Bobby: Bobby posted “”:

“Newton's Third Law of Motion states that for every action (force) in nature, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
When one object exerts force on another, the second object instantly exerts an equal force in the opposite direction.
This principle explains how rockets launch, swimmers move, and cars drive.”

     Bobby’s post states the same ideas as what I posted, only I posted using my own words. The meaning of what Bobby posted is no different than my explained posting, only the weight of each object matters.
     The “equal and opposite reaction” depends on the weight (of the liquid fuel) being used to influence the main object (being the rocket and payload) to be influenced. Rocket fuel being used to influence far heaver rockets etc, fuel weight is far less in weight to influence far heavier rocket engine and pay load other than miner directional changes.
     In a no atmosphere environment the use of burning liquid into gases doesn’t change the weight of liquids turned into gases, yet the expansion of liquids into gasses creates the force of the hot gases weight in desired directions. The Idea that Newton's theory explains swimming and how cars move, relates to having an atmosphere involved hot gases can push against, doesn't prove a no atmosphere environment has the same moving forwards performance result.

     I tried to state rocket engine exhausts don’t work the same in a no atmosphere environment as when rocket exhausts are pushing against an atmosphere. Google posts stating “Newton's Third Law of Motion” drives rockets forwards that exhaust pushing against earth’s atmosphere is not mentioned, readers assume atmosphere plays no part in rocket propulsion. Non thinkers want to believe media aren’t telling lies about outer space travel as they don’t want to believe they have been fooled.
     Most school educated people hate learning new ideas to avoid memories of repressed anxiety awareness of classroom and homework learning traumas. Myself trying to express new ideas and debunk myths which most readers are going to feel new and debunking ideas feel like hated school learning, many readers will feel reduced repressed traumas if they express to themselves that my posts are BS, hence experience emotional decision making skills are good true intelligent responses.

     I doubt school education science would have taught rocket engine determinations on atmosphere environments. Merely because school education taught science, that many students passed exams, knowledge is usually specific, passing exams doesn’t mean students can assume they understand everything scientific.

     In around 1986 I spent 2 years fixing colour televisions for an monetary earning income, mostly buying old televisions, fixing them and reselling them. I was good at fixing televisions, yet changed my income profession to something different. I also designed circuits and etched copper coated circuit boards making several items: disco sound tone activated red green blue lights; four channel chase lights that had ten different speed and pattern movements, cost so much to build, I couldn’t assume a profit margin; I made a ten pin bowling ally electric board inferred LED pin counters to replace old metal mechanical functions which worked except for overhead lighting interference, the bowling ally maintenance man failed to solve, I had no direct communication with the ally owner to negotiate a price for more boards.

     I heard long ago school education doesn’t teach grammar. An episode of “Adam Ruins Everything” argued that the English language is so divers all those old rules of grammar are irrelevant.

     My previous posts related to Mr X big headed narcissistic behaviours, an event I experienced was that Mr X read one post, only to examine the grammar, stating he didn’t care about the reading’s meanings, quickly stating my grammar was terrible. I asked him to install the reading on a windows office program to examine the underlined grammar mistakes which he did... he found no underlined grammar mistakes, that’s because I used a windows office word program grammar turned on to aid typing up readings. Mr X blamed the use of : and ; stopped the word grammar program from working properly and that the office program was US American not Australian grammar. Mr X’s delusion of superior intelligence inner brain Neanderthal emotional decision making skills felt better than his on coming anxiety (worsening his depression) of being dumb being out played on his education’s language skills.

     An idea that rocket engines push against themselves argument words proving that rocket engines work in a no atmosphere environment the same as an atmosphere environments, feeds the delusional desires of people not to have been fooled.

I read Bobby’s post a week ago, that I intended to post a new post on the Newton's Third Law of Motion, yet I didn’t want to clog up the forum page with my many posts. I also had other better things to do.

steve9
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print