Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Racism 'deeply embedded' in universities (Read 309 times)
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 55433
Gender: male
Re: Racism 'deeply embedded' in universities
Reply #15 - Feb 17th, 2026 at 11:01pm
 
It's an unofficial subject conducted by volunteers to promote the University culture of anti-white racism in favour of African, Islam, the IRA and Aboriginal victimhood narratives.

Race Wars against Yellow people in their own countries is acceptable.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 56810
Gender: male
Re: Racism 'deeply embedded' in universities
Reply #16 - Feb 18th, 2026 at 7:43am
 
Australia’s far-left Race Discrimination Commissioner has released a report on racism at universities that is biased against White Australians and recommends they be replaced by ethnic minorities in the tertiary sector workforce.

The Indian-born bureaucrat, who collects a taxpayer-funded salary package of $408,000 a year but calls Australia “stolen land”, wants Australia Day moved and says White people can’t experience racism, unveiled the Racism@Uni report with Education Minister Jason Clare in Brisbane on Tuesday.


Mr Sivaraman called the report “harrowing reading” and said it showed “racism is deeply embedded within our universities”, and delivered 47 recommendations, including one demanding more funding for the Australian Human Rights Commission to conduct more reviews.

The report used a far-left definition of racism that includes “harassment, abuse, humiliation, microaggressions, violence and intimidation” in regards to “institutional and structural arrangements that produce inequity and privilege dominant White, Western norms and systems that may dehumanise, exclude, or marginalise individuals, groups, cultures and religions”, and as a result did not address racism against White Australians.

...

The accounts included “racism” complaints about allegedly being ignored, having names mispronounced, being excluded in group assignments, seeing White people and Asian people sitting at different tables, and finding it difficult to do group work with people from other backgrounds.

In one grammatically incorrect complaint, an Indian student claimed a professor accused them of buying an assignment or using AI to write it, and in another an aboriginal student complained about being told they “couldn’t use indigenous knowledges (sic) or standpoint in my PhD because there was no such thing as them”.

Other aboriginal students complained about an Indigenous Studies course being “taught and owned by White people”, and that learning about the supposed harms of colonialism was “retraumatising”.

A Middle Eastern staff member complained about a build-up of so-called micro-aggressions that included “saying someone had a funny accent”, an Asian staff member complained that student feedback was “gendered, sexist and racialised”, another non-White staff member said her university’s anonymous feedback system “reproduced structural racism”, and a Jewish participant complained that it was “systemically racist” that most people on their university’s council were White.

Another aboriginal participant complained that being asked how to recognise and respect cultural diversity forced them to bear “cultural load”, a student complained about racism support psychologists being White, and a Muslim staff member said it was racist that she had to use her own personal leave to take time off on Muslim holidays, but not Christmas.
https://www.noticer.news/university-racism-report-australia/

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 56810
Gender: male
Re: Racism 'deeply embedded' in universities
Reply #17 - Feb 18th, 2026 at 1:23pm
 
Frank wrote on Feb 17th, 2026 at 9:34pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Feb 17th, 2026 at 1:23pm:


A nonsense report. Total bollocks.




Why is This Man Taken Seriously?



...
On January 25, during an SBS panel discussion titled “Australia Day: January 26 and the limits of belonging,” Race Discrimination Commissioner Giridharan Sivaraman, known as ‘Geri’, framed the national day in explicitly moral terms. “When it comes to January 26, it becomes so difficult … you’ve just got to, on January 26, you’ve got to kiss the flag, love the country, otherwise go away.”
He went further, declaring: “We’re all on stolen land and we actually need truth-telling about the history of this land.”

And: “Systems and institutions… were built to really privilege colonialism and whiteness.”

These statements are not casual commentary, nor are they the considered judgements of a neutral public servant. They are language more commonly associated with political activism than with statutory neutrality. The posture is deliberate: by portraying the Australian state as founded on theft, colonial corruption, and racial exclusion, he manufactures a permanent moral crisis, one that conveniently sustains the necessity, relevance, and moral urgency of his own office.

A public official is entitled to personal views. But the office of Race Discrimination Commissioner carries a distinct obligation of institutional neutrality. When its Commissioner characterises the nation’s legal and political framework as structurally illegitimate, the role shifts from administering law to advancing a contested historical and ideological narrative.

The question is not whether such views may be expressed in public debate. It is whether they are compatible with the responsibilities of a statutory office designed to uphold the integrity of the legal order it critiques.

Australia is not a colony. It ceased to be one in 1901, when six self-governing colonies federated into a sovereign Commonwealth. Whatever moral arguments are advanced about the eighteenth or nineteenth centuries, they do not alter the legal and political reality that modern Australia is a constitutional nation whose authority flows from democratic self-government, not imperial delegation.
The phrase “we’re all on stolen land” is not descriptive; it is accusatory. It makes no distinctions between time, conduct, law, or citizenship. It indicts the migrant family who arrived in 1950, the refugee who arrived in 1980, and the child born yesterday equally and without remedy. There is no pathway to innocence, because innocence is declared impossible. That is not human rights reasoning. It is collective moral condemnation by ancestry and inheritance.

Public offices are not platforms for moral absolutism. They exist to serve the constitutional order, not to delegitimise it from within. When rhetoric shifts from critique to total condemnation the officeholder has simply ceased to act as a guardian of rights.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print