Melanias purse wrote on Feb 18^th, 2026 at 10:11am:


MAGA still haven't answered that question.

“I don’t mean 50%. I mean 14 to 1,500%.”

Melanias purse wrote on Feb 18^th, 2026 at 11:24am:



Why would I despise China?

China can build a 10 km bridge in the time the Dan Andrews cfmeu alliance can build a piece of Ikea furniture.
So much to admire.

China is full of hard working patriots and a government surveillance system  to punish morons.

American is full of obese entitled dickheads who spend their day fussing about somalians, trans rights and Gaza.

We are going to live in an autocratic surveillance society,  like it or not.

Much better to have intelligent efficient leaders who reward industriousness and punish sooky entitled takers

Melanias purse wrote on Feb 18^th, 2026 at 11:24am:



What IS, indeed, the point you are grimacing about but NOT making apart from the usual point you ever make, you ever want to make, is 'Trumphitler is bad' and ... er... that's it.

Socialism - misnomer. 'Real socialism' hasn't been done anywhere and so the debate about 'parameters' is a perennial escape shute.
State capitalism - still  lefty scam, so the 'parameters' as always, are endlessly debatable. The old  'define' what the meaning of 'is' is.

Yet, whatever you call the system, whether socialism or state capitalism or whatever parameters you want to debate, the COMMUNIST Party - for that is what they call themselves - is in charge of every aspect of economic, political, cultural and social life. 
So if socialism's parameters are debatable what isn't debatable is that every time a Communist Party gets to be in charge of a country, they *uck it up, good and proper and quickish. THey all do it slightly differetnly but what is common to all is that a communist party is doing it.

Frank wrote on Feb 18^th, 2026 at 1:47pm:


You see? Then we agree. What would be the point of that?

Aquascoot's only real allegiance with the CCP is their authoritarianism, a point on which he makes himself perfectly clear.

Your attempt to debate the meaning of "is" is a mere attempt to obfuscate, but one not without it's ontological curiosity.

After all, when Marx was asked what the meaning of "is" is, he replied with a word: struggle.

Yes, beyond all the dialectical, Hegelian rhetoric, Marx could see exactly what you're up to, dear boy.

You just want to pass wind, no?

greggerypeccary wrote on Feb 18^th, 2026 at 2:42pm:


Maybe Mort's researching a suitable response, Greggery.

It may not happen overnight, but it will happen, no?

Frank wrote on Feb 18^th, 2026 at 8:43pm:


Incoherence, is it? Perhaps you'd prefer one to be a little more clear.

You, dear boy, are a card-carrying goosestepper.

Does that help to clear things up?

We're here if you need any clarification.

thegreatdivide wrote on Feb 18^th, 2026 at 10:35am:



I know a fair number of so called poor people living from "paycheck to paycheck". Mostly their situation is self inflicted due to poor money management. You can't have it all now because someone will extend you credit. Most are either lazy or have no idea the opportunities available. I personally know a man who became a millionaire mowing lawns.

Mortdooley wrote on Feb 19^th, 2026 at 1:42am:



The Texuus educational system everybody. The reason why morty torty's Rx drug claim his meds cost $10 is due governmental assistance or he is lying.


Now, who pays for the rest of morty torty antipsychotic medication? That's right, people who actually have to work. Something a government parasite like morty torty will never understand