|
MeisterEckhart
|
Frank wrote on Feb 16 th, 2026 at 6:27pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 16 th, 2026 at 5:56pm: Frank wrote on Feb 16 th, 2026 at 5:37pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 16 th, 2026 at 5:12pm: Bobby. wrote on Feb 16 th, 2026 at 4:55pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 16 th, 2026 at 4:50pm: Bobby. wrote on Feb 16 th, 2026 at 4:41pm: MeisterEckhart wrote on Feb 16 th, 2026 at 4:19pm: Xi can now trust almost no one within the Politburo... Sooner or later, he'll be waking up dead... Starting a stupid war is just what would do it. The friends he's purging, and others, are those who are unwilling to commit suicide by starting, or even preparing for, a war against Taiwan. I'm glad to hear that - I suppose we can get rid of our army now? Oh - and we won't need the subs either? What?? Get rid of our army? What would our leaders offer up when they crawl on all fours behind a US president to a war in Asia? When they tell us to die on the beaches in Taiwan? Well, assuming the position and getting their nose stuck in the sphincter of a US president has been a rite of passage for an Australian prime minister since WW2... What's a few dead troops, anyway...? Y'know... For the people, Oi, Oi, Oi... A very stupid, sneering thing to say. Australia, like other countries, has alliances, friendly countries as well as hostile and antagonstic opponents. For 40 years after WWII it was the US and the Western aliance versus the commies. Now it's the US and the Western alliance (weak as it is) versus still the commies and the Muslims. Yes, with the steady demographic transformation of Austrlai, the alliance may change, althougfh I am not sure which demographic will prevail - Chinese, Indian or Muslim. Seeing Chinese infertlity, I am not betting on the Chinese. But China doesn't need to occupy anyone to dominate. Well, you can always slink off back home from where you came from... you're old enough, I'm guessing, for anyone not to recognise you, so... you should be OK... A namechange might help... Sebastian Melmoth? ANY disagreemeng with you on ANY topic prompts your Pavlovian snarling about homos. It MUST be a latent and not so latent preoccupation of yours. Your instant countering of any disagreement is about snarling about homos. Never any backing up of your points, never any citing of supporting arguments or views, never any reasoning - just instant homo snarling. You against a homosexual world. We read you. Reread the sh!t you post here when you're in a gay rage... I don't read them doing it to you. Just like your hometown, garbage like you don't belong in public forums.
|