Nuriyah Khan is an ex muslim her father preached Islam.

Here she is debunking the bullshit on Taliban being radical Islam with legalising slavery and banning women from education.

It's not radical it's just Islam.

There seems to be a flaw in her argument.  According to her, there is no radical Islam but according to all the Muslims I know there definitely is. Radical Islam exists on the fringes of Muslim thought and teaching it is definitely not mainstream.  Indeed you backing that it is shows your ignorance Baron.  How many Muslims do you know personally?  Any at all.  I suspect none, your Islamophobia is text book learnt from Islamophobes rather than association with Muslims.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... 

Does she explain ISIS (Daesh)?

There are multiple sects within Islam, many of which are fundamentalist, militant and violent.

Then there are those that are not... like, say, sects within Sufi Islam.

One of the first things that the Islamic State did was institutionalise sex slavery. I have never met a Muslim who is prepared to say that slavery is inherently wrong. They go through all sorts of moral contortionism to play it down. Abu liked to say that it was only acceptable in certain situations, but was fairly vague on what those situations were. I think the situation created by the Islamic state was one of them. You have to pillage before you can rape. There's even a verse in the Quran along those lines.

Another aspect that has emerged in recent days is the complicity of Islamic women in the activities of their menfolk. As I gradually realised a decade ago, they are almost all aware that every chap in their household is participating in the gang-rape of certain white working-class girls - and they're cool with that. After all, if you have to live among the hideous painted strumpets of the infidel, the girls might as well be put to use. So from The Daily Mail:

Labour mayor is found guilty of helping hide her son's phone after he raped a 15-year-old girl

I had initially assumed, following the mayor's tearful plea in court that a "mother's love" had clouded her judgment, that the rapist was seventeen, nineteen or some such. In fact, as you can see from the photograph above, the kid was forty-one. At the time, he was serving, officially, as "Consort" to the Mayor. That's some bollocks-type title equivalent to the use of "First Lady" in America, which is likewise bollocks and which I have never liked. But apparently "Consort" is its British and non-binary equivalent and, as our illustration makes plain, comes with its own impressive chain of "office".

And in Berkshire, Diwan Khan, Consort to the Mayor of Bracknell Forest, while in-between municipal functions, enjoyed slipping drugs into the drinks of minors and then raping them. His fifteen-year-old victim woke up naked on the back seat of his car and wondered what had happened. So the Consort to the Mayor used one hand to choke her and the other to hold up his telephone and show her the video he'd taken of their romantic interlude. This is also a very Paki thing: most rapists are a little sheepish about evidence of their brutality. But, in the vibrant diversity of England, the thugs who violate your daughters like to make souvenir movies they can show to their friends, brothers, fathers, grandfathers, etc.

Do they also show them to Mum? When the police knocked on the door of Mayor Naheed Ejaz, she waited a minute-and-a-half before responding. She used that time to order her son - in Urdu, so the coppers could not understand - to hide his mobile.

Because she knew what Muslim men keep on their telephones.

She knew what the police would see if they found it - and apparently she could not be as sure of the indifference of Thames Valley Police as Mancunians, Yorkshiremen and Shropshire lads are of the indifference of the Greater Manchester, South Yorkshire and West Mercia constabularies. When the coppers had been admitted, both mother and son continued to speak in Urdu, avoiding the word "phone", which is the same in both languages. So on bodycam video Diwan can be heard referring only to "the big bell", to which the Mayor replies, "Keep quiet. I know." The mobile has never been found.

Tellingly, Naheed Ejaz owned, and Diwan Khan drove for, a family taxi firm - because cabs are also central to control of the municipal rape-gang business. The Mayor has now been convicted of perverting the course of justice. But the family are old hands at perverting in a more general sense.

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 15^th, 2026 at 8:26am:






🥱

RADICAL ISLAM / MARCO RUBIO DEFINES : source of EVIL

Vivid.🇮🇱@VividProwess 21h

Marco Rubio: "Radical Islam is a clear and imminent threat to the world and to the broader West, but especially to the United States, which they identify as the chief source of evil on the planet."


https://x.com/VividProwess/status/2022385289507795140



https://m3.gab.com/media_attachments/30/ca/fd/30cafda8c539f0cfc198b0ca65ae2929.m...

Oh, poor, poor, Soren.  Knowing Muslims provides a basic understanding of their religion.  A fair better understanding than anything you've shown.  Far better than what you've displayed.  Your understanding equivalent to a 14 year old whose been locked away with an encyclopedia for a fortnight.  You rely on Islamophobes who have no understanding about what they spouting.  Run along, back your bridge Troll.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... 

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 15^th, 2026 at 6:45pm:



Focus, ignorant, militantly stupid bozo:

Knowing a coupla Muslim is not an understanding of Islam.   You know that, we all know that. Yet, stupidly and totally dishonestly, you peddle your passing encounter with Muslims as an understanding of Islam.


I am amazed that you insist on being an idiot. What is that about?

Normally when people are given a counter-argument they respond to it, address it.  You - you just carry on as if NOTHING was ever said to counter you.  No wonder you are regarded as a total moron in your very own bubble.

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 15^th, 2026 at 8:01pm:



Your grasp on reality is evidently very tenuous.

Knowing a coupla Muslim is not an understanding of Islam.   You know that, we all know that. Yet, stupidly and totally dishonestly, you peddle your passing encounter with Muslims as an understanding of Islam.

You think that talking to a couple of Muslims gives you an understanding of All of Islam and All Mulims. You are severly impared.  Certainly not fully rational.
Worse. You are totally dishonet.

You do KNOW all of the above yet you dishonestly pretend otherwise.  You are lying on purpose.


(and I am giving you the benefit of doubt that you are compos mentis. I know you ain't but I am treating you, for tis post only,  as  if)



You are a type for the broader purposes of this topic. An idiotic underminer and repudiator of everything that unifies Australians. You are the voice of everythng that rubbishes and degrades Australia, from ABos to Muslims.

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 15^th, 2026 at 8:25pm:





Twilight zone

* YAWN *

Terrorism no longer shocks Britain

British Jews are under threat. That was the blunt warning from Sir Stephen Watson after a jury at Preston Crown Court convicted Walid Saadaoui and Amar Hussein of preparing acts of terrorism. The Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police said that had their plan succeeded it would have been ‘one of the worst atrocities’ the world had seen. He was right.

A civilisation cannot limit its terror response to surveillance, infiltration and the disruption of plots moments before execution. That is containment, not resolution

Saadaoui, 38, of Wigan, and Hussein, 52, of Bolton, had set out to replicate the 2015 Paris attacks. Their chosen targets were synagogues, Jewish schools and a kosher supermarket in the north west of England. They purchased assault rifles, handguns and around 1,000 rounds of ammunition. The intention, in the words heard in court, was to ‘kill as many members of the Jewish community as they could’ and to become ‘martyrs’ in revenge for Israel’s actions in Gaza.

According to the prosecution, they intended to escape the first attack scene, steal or use an ambulance as a getaway vehicle, continue attacks at additional locations and potentially fire on responding police officers. The judge later described the plot as ‘very close’ to execution when officers moved in. Saadaoui was arrested ‘red-handed’ in a hotel car park while taking delivery of weapons from the boot of a rented Lexus in an undercover operation.

The sentences reflected the gravity of their crimes. Saadaoui received life imprisonment with a minimum term of 37 years. Hussein was handed life with a minimum of 26 years. Saadaoui’s brother, Bilel, was jailed for six years for failing to disclose information about the plan.

Thank God the authorities intervened. The surveillance, the infiltration by the undercover operative known in court as ‘Farouk’, the patience required to allow evidence to accumulate without allowing bloodshed to occur, all of it deserves public gratitude. Sir Stephen said the force had avoided something that would have ranked among the worst atrocities seen globally. The fact that it was prevented shows the counter-terrorism network is, for the most part, managing an immense and permanent burden.


For the most part. The Manchester synagogue attack in October at Heaton Park is a reminder that prevention is never total. There are gaps, moments, failures. The threat environment is saturated.

Sir Stephen chose his words carefully. ‘We are seeing the manifestation of hatred moving beyond our shores globally and this is a threat to all of us. It is a threat to our Jewish communities and, if our Jewish communities are under threat, we are all under threat.’ He added that Jewish children are ‘the only children in our country who day to day go to school behind large fences guarded by people with vizzy jackets and where there are routine police patrols in and around those areas.’ That observation lands heavily. It describes a parallel civic reality.

Islamic State-inspired terrorism no longer shocks in Britain. It horrifies, it angers, but it does not surprise. The ideological script is familiar. In this case the jury heard evidence of social-media posts allegedly praising Islamic State, statements praising the 2015 Paris attacks, references to martyrdom, expressions of hatred toward Jews and Christians, and extremist propaganda found on devices. When Hussein was asked directly whether he supported Islamic State, he replied: ‘Do you want a true answer? Yes.’ He explained why: ‘They are Muslims. They make Sharia.’

Saadaoui told the undercover officer that attackers should ‘carry out operations against the Jews and the Crusaders there, and hitting them there affects them badly.’ In a Christmas Day voice note he dismissed knives and vehicles as ‘ineffective’ and concluded: ‘what is needed is an automatic gun.’ This was ideological conviction articulated without disguise.

Some still reach for alternative explanations for Islamic terrorism. Poverty. Marginalisation. Social exclusion. The problem is that Saadaoui does not fit the model. He arrived in Britain legally in 2012 after marrying an English woman he met while working as a hotel entertainer in Tunisia. He worked at a Haven Holiday Village, saved, trained as a chef, bought the Albatross Italian restaurant in Great Yarmouth for £25,000, ran weddings and birthday parties, owned a house on Ipswich Road, sold it for £169,000, remarried, had children. He appeared to be a conventional immigrant success story. Integrated. Industrious. Embedded.

Before his arrest, he allegedly transferred assets to family members, withdrew large amounts of cash, wrote a will and discussed leaving messages for his family after ‘martyrdom’. That preparation for death did not grow out of economic despair but out of belief. Indeed, if poverty caused terrorism, we would see waves of attacks by the poor and disadvantaged from other backgrounds, but we do not.

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 15^th, 2026 at 6:45pm:


Your stupidity is boundless. And you are proud of it, which is amazing.

So if you talk to a coupla Chinese or Japanese in Australia you know China and Japan? 

THe ludicrous corollary of that stupidity is that talking to you, gweggy, Carl and karnal one gets to know what Australia and Australians are really all about.   

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 16^th, 2026 at 12:57pm:

What would the comparison be if the number of those killed by extremist Islamists were stacked against those Asians killed by American goddists and their allies, I'm wondering.

Brian Ross wrote on Feb 15^th, 2026 at 8:26am:


Are you claiming Nuriyah Khan who was born and raised as a muslim with a father who is an Imam and lived in the Middle east under Sharia law is an Islamophobe?

There is no separate doctrine called radical Islam.

What's not to reject?


A Muslim preacher in Britain admits that Islam is at war against white Christian men, women, and children in the UK. He vows to deprive non-Muslims of basic human rights.

https://x.com/LizaRosen0000/status/2023733886501470545



Moderate Islam is like moderate nazism, moderate Stalinism, moderate sexual slavery, moderate political, cultural and social subjugation.
We enslave, subjugate and degrade you moderately. 

U.S. — With the nation reeling from an outbreak of violent incidents in the wake of the U.S. military strikes against Iran, the media clarified that there was no known motive yet in the attack on a Jewish Synagogue by a radical Muslim.

Though an outspoken Islamic extremist who originated from the Middle East and had expressed support for ISIS and loaded his car with explosives and rammed it directly into a synagogue and daycare facility, journalists explained that there simply wasn't any way to know at this point why he committed such an act.

"We may never know," said one reporter. "These acts of violence are often so random and take place without any discernible motive behind them, so the reason why this Muslim man seemed to intentionally target a place where Jewish people congregate. It is, by all accounts, just a completely random tragedy."

Other journalists speculated that the incident may have resulted from something completely unrelated to the fact that the attacker was a radical Muslim and the victims were Jewish people. "It's difficult to settle on any one correlation," another reporter said. "We'll do our best to connect the dots, but quite frankly, this one is likely to remain a mystery."

At publishing time, the media was said to be unsure how the attacker shouting "Allah Akbar!" and "Death to Jews!" in the moments just before the attack may have factored into his motive.

Nonchalantly sipping his coffee while an explosion erupts. Love it.

Frank wrote on Mar 18^th, 2026 at 11:37am:


"them"?

Those two guys?

Frank wrote on Mar 18^th, 2026 at 12:07pm:


All two billion of them?

Two dickheads in a video represent every Muslim on the planet?

      You're hilarious sometimes.

Aquarius wrote on Mar 18^th, 2026 at 1:27pm:

Agree Aquarius ♒
As the song goes, currently - they are all in it together.

Frank wrote on Mar 18^th, 2026 at 4:48pm:


The onus is on you, old boy   

He only thinks about the size of Trump's penis.
What a loser

Christians, Jews, Kurds and Yazidi should be the only permissible immigrants/refugees from anywhere in the Middle East.  They have been almost decimated by the mussos.  So why are we allowing muslims - the perpetrators - to migrate and/or apply as refugees?  The only legitimate refugees should be non muslims. 

And now we are seeing for ourselves through musso terrorist acts here in Australia, the hatred of these muslims towards the infidels.  But you reap as you sow.  Unfortunately the Labor govt doesn't want to go there.  And while they keep appeasing and kowtowing to the mussos, we will suffer the consequences.

Aquarius wrote on Apr 15^th, 2026 at 9:38am:

Indeed.

What we are doing, by importing practicing Muslims, is analogous to importing Nazi party members from Germany or Communist Party members from the Soviet.
Or cannibals from the Cannibal Islands.

Culture matters. Nazism, communism, Islam, cannibalism are matters of culture, that is, choice. You choose them - we dont choose you.