Australian Politics Forum - "more than a million times"

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 150224 Gender:	"more than a million times" Yesterday at 1:37pm Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) told Axios in an interview Tuesday that when he searched President Trump's name in the unredacted Epstein files the previous day, it came up "more than a million times."
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 150224 Gender:	Re: "more than a million times" Reply #1 - Yesterday at 1:40pm Trump in Epstein Files "a Million Times"
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

ProudKangaroo Gold Member Offline The Sandstorm is coming 🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵 Posts: 21884 Meeanjin (Brisbane)	Re: "more than a million times" Reply #2 - Yesterday at 1:52pm So, we should start calling them the Trump Files?
Back to top	IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 117007 Melbourne Gender:	Re: "more than a million times" Reply #3 - Yesterday at 1:57pm greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 1:37pm: Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) told Axios in an interview Tuesday that when he searched President Trump's name in the unredacted Epstein files the previous day, it came up "more than a million times." Paywalled and not covered on the MSM.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 150224 Gender:	Re: "more than a million times" Reply #4 - Yesterday at 2:09pm ProudKangaroo wrote Yesterday at 1:52pm: So, we should start calling them the Trump Files? Absolutely. His name appears more than Epstein's.
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 117007 Melbourne Gender:	Re: "more than a million times" Reply #5 - Yesterday at 2:19pm Trump never went to Epstein's pedo Island. It's all salacious gossip from people like Greggy.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 150224
Gender: male

Re: "more than a million times"
Reply #6 - Yesterday at 2:37pm

Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 2:19pm:

Trump never went to Epstein's pedo Island.

It's all salacious gossip from people like Greggy. Roll Eyes

Epstein had more than one residence, Bobby.

7. Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts,
sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional
distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the
Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994.

The parties were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and
was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other
sexual contacts detailed herein.

10. Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties.
On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiff
to a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff. During the
course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but
with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in
the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A and B.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 100852

Re: "more than a million times"
Reply #7 - Yesterday at 5:17pm

Now now, Greggery, you need to pay attention. Listen to the "noble Scoot".

The big fella was working for the CIA. Agent Trump, you see, was just doing his job in a top secret opperation to catch Jeff in the act with his young fillies.

To do so, Donnie needed to spend ten years with the guy, run a joint "modelling agency" together, move next door to him in Palm Beach, and head down to the island every now and then to participate in his orgies.

It makes perfect sense he'd be all through the files, dear. The Don was about to crack the big one when he accidentally became prez and had to pull out. He had to secure the files at the end of his term, taking his boxes with him. He made sure to keep them in highly classified locations around Mar a Lago, as you do.

The Deep State blew that one, as you'd expect. To this day, Donnie's role in this operation was one of the biggest secrets in CIA history. Until Aquascoot blew the whistle, nobody was any the wiser.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 56585 Gender:	Re: "more than a million times" Reply #8 - Yesterday at 5:44pm greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 1:37pm: Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) told Axios in an interview Tuesday that when he searched President Trump's name in the unredacted Epstein files the previous day, it came up "more than a million times." So why didn't Sleepy Joe (aka Bazza O'Bama Mark III) release the docs?
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 100852

Re: "more than a million times"
Reply #9 - Yesterday at 5:54pm

Frank wrote Yesterday at 5:44pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 1:37pm:

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) told Axios in an interview Tuesday that when he searched President Trump's name in the unredacted Epstein files the previous day, it came up "more than a million times."

So why didn't Sleepy Joe (aka Bazza O'Bama Mark III) release the docs?

He's right, Greggery.

Also, why didn't Bazza release the 2002 Muslim gang rape files?

He could have had them sent over from Scotland Yard, shurely.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 150224
Gender: male

Re: "more than a million times"
Reply #10 - Yesterday at 5:56pm

Frank wrote Yesterday at 5:44pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 1:37pm:

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) told Axios in an interview Tuesday that when he searched President Trump's name in the unredacted Epstein files the previous day, it came up "more than a million times."

So why didn't Sleepy Joe (aka Bazza O'Bama Mark III) release the docs?

How many times do you need to be told the answer to that diversionary question?

There was an ongoing court case involving Ghislaine Maxwell until 2022, and then ongoing appeals until 2025.

Releasing investigative files, such as witness statements or grand jury testimony, could have jeopardised her conviction and violated court seals intended to protect the trial's integrity.

And, during an appeal, it is standard practice for investigative files to remain sealed to prevent claims that the proceedings were tainted by external information.

A federal judge in New York kept the documents under seal, unsealing them in batches (notably, a large set in January 2024) only as legal challenges allowed.

While some documents were released in early 2024, the broader, more sensitive investigative files remained sealed until the legal proceedings concluded, with the Supreme Court ultimately declining to hear her appeal in October 2025.

To dumb it down for you: there was ongoing legal action involving Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell while Biden was President.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 56585
Gender: male

Re: "more than a million times"
Reply #11 - Yesterday at 5:58pm

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 5:56pm:

Frank wrote Yesterday at 5:44pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 1:37pm:

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) told Axios in an interview Tuesday that when he searched President Trump's name in the unredacted Epstein files the previous day, it came up "more than a million times."

So why didn't Sleepy Joe (aka Bazza O'Bama Mark III) release the docs?

How many times do you need to be told the answer to that diversionary question?

There was an ongoing court case involving Ghislaine Maxwell until 2022, and then ongoing appeals until 2025.

Releasing investigative files, such as witness statements or grand jury testimony, could have jeopardised her conviction and violated court seals intended to protect the trial's integrity.

And, during an appeal, it is standard practice for investigative files to remain sealed to prevent claims that the proceedings were tainted by external information.

A federal judge in New York kept the documents under seal, unsealing them in batches (notably, a large set in January 2024) only as legal challenges allowed.

While some documents were released in early 2024, the broader, more sensitive investigative files remained sealed until the legal proceedings concluded, with the Supreme Court ultimately declining to hear her appeal in October 2025.

And you fapped to that a million times.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 150224
Gender: male

Re: "more than a million times"
Reply #12 - Yesterday at 6:00pm

Frank wrote Yesterday at 5:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 5:56pm:

Frank wrote Yesterday at 5:44pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 1:37pm:

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) told Axios in an interview Tuesday that when he searched President Trump's name in the unredacted Epstein files the previous day, it came up "more than a million times."

So why didn't Sleepy Joe (aka Bazza O'Bama Mark III) release the docs?

How many times do you need to be told the answer to that diversionary question?

There was an ongoing court case involving Ghislaine Maxwell until 2022, and then ongoing appeals until 2025.

Releasing investigative files, such as witness statements or grand jury testimony, could have jeopardised her conviction and violated court seals intended to protect the trial's integrity.

And, during an appeal, it is standard practice for investigative files to remain sealed to prevent claims that the proceedings were tainted by external information.

A federal judge in New York kept the documents under seal, unsealing them in batches (notably, a large set in January 2024) only as legal challenges allowed.

While some documents were released in early 2024, the broader, more sensitive investigative files remained sealed until the legal proceedings concluded, with the Supreme Court ultimately declining to hear her appeal in October 2025.

I know legal proceedings and the surrounding processes are difficult for you to understand.

Maybe have an adult explain it to you.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

greggerypeccary Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 150224 Gender:	Re: "more than a million times" Reply #13 - Yesterday at 6:01pm A million times! How many more times is that than we first thought, Mr President? "1,200, 1,300 and 1,400, 1,500%". "I don’t mean 50%. I mean 14 - 1,500%".
Back to top	GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles IP Logged

Melanias purse

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 100852

Re: "more than a million times"
Reply #14 - Yesterday at 6:46pm

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 6:00pm:

Frank wrote Yesterday at 5:58pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 5:56pm:

Frank wrote Yesterday at 5:44pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 1:37pm:

Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) told Axios in an interview Tuesday that when he searched President Trump's name in the unredacted Epstein files the previous day, it came up "more than a million times."

So why didn't Sleepy Joe (aka Bazza O'Bama Mark III) release the docs?

How many times do you need to be told the answer to that diversionary question?

There was an ongoing court case involving Ghislaine Maxwell until 2022, and then ongoing appeals until 2025.

Releasing investigative files, such as witness statements or grand jury testimony, could have jeopardised her conviction and violated court seals intended to protect the trial's integrity.

And, during an appeal, it is standard practice for investigative files to remain sealed to prevent claims that the proceedings were tainted by external information.

A federal judge in New York kept the documents under seal, unsealing them in batches (notably, a large set in January 2024) only as legal challenges allowed.

While some documents were released in early 2024, the broader, more sensitive investigative files remained sealed until the legal proceedings concluded, with the Supreme Court ultimately declining to hear her appeal in October 2025.

I know legal proceedings and the surrounding processes are difficult for you to understand.

Maybe have an adult explain it to you.

Rule of law, innit.

Back to top

IP Logged