Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
"more than a million times" (Read 162 times)
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 56582
Gender: male
Re: "more than a million times"
Reply #15 - Yesterday at 7:55pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 6:00pm:
Frank wrote Yesterday at 5:58pm:
greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 5:56pm:
Frank wrote Yesterday at 5:44pm:
greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 1:37pm:
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) told Axios in an interview Tuesday that when he searched President Trump's name in the unredacted Epstein files the previous day, it came up "more than a million times."




So why didn't Sleepy Joe (aka Bazza O'Bama Mark III) release the docs?


How many times do you need to be told the answer to that diversionary question?

There was an ongoing court case involving Ghislaine Maxwell until 2022, and then ongoing appeals until 2025.

Releasing investigative files, such as witness statements or grand jury testimony, could have jeopardised her conviction and violated court seals intended to protect the trial's integrity.

And, during an appeal, it is standard practice for investigative files to remain sealed to prevent claims that the proceedings were tainted by external information.

A federal judge in New York kept the documents under seal, unsealing them in batches (notably, a large set in January 2024) only as legal challenges allowed.

While some documents were released in early 2024, the broader, more sensitive investigative files remained sealed until the legal proceedings concluded, with the Supreme Court ultimately declining to hear her appeal in October 2025.

Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


I know legal proceedings and the surrounding processes are difficult for you to understand.

Maybe have an adult explain it to you.



Your million wanks speak for themselves.

Repulsive.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Carl D
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 10637
Rivervale, Perth
Gender: male
Re: "more than a million times"
Reply #16 - Yesterday at 8:17pm
 
"more than a million times"

Wow, that's a lot more than I expected.

Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 1:57pm:
Paywalled and not covered on the MSM.    Roll Eyes


Bobby, why is everything always paywalled for you? Every time you've said something is paywalled I (and I suspect nearly everyone else) can see it without a paywall?

Do you think someone is trying to tell you something?

Are you being watched by the government and the media?  Undecided

Anyway - here you go:

Quote:
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) told Axios in an interview Tuesday that when he searched President Trump's name in the unredacted Epstein files the previous day, it came up "more than a million times."

Why it matters: At least one of the files Raskin found appears to contradict what Trump has publicly claimed about his association with Jeffrey Epstein, according to the House Judiciary Committee ranking member.

    That document is a 2009 email exchange between Epstein and his associate, Ghislaine Maxwell, in which Epstein recounted his lawyers' account of a phone call with Trump, as Raskin previously told reporters.
    "Trump is paraphrased and quoted as saying, 'No, Jeffrey Epstein was not a member of Mar-a-Lago, but he was a guest at Mar-a-Lago, and no, we never asked him to leave,'" Raskin said in an interview at the Capitol.

The other side: Trump has denied all wrongdoing in the Epstein matter, and he's maintained that he kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago for poaching spa workers.

    The former Palm Beach chief of police testified to the FBI in 2019 that following Epstein's arrest in the early 2000s, Trump claimed he threw Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago, the Epstein files show.
    Trump reportedly also told the then-police chief that "everyone has known he's been doing this" and that Maxwell is "evil and to focus on her."

Zoom in: Asked for comment, the White House pointed to three posts on X from Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche pushing back on Rep. Thomas Massie's (R-Ky.) claims about the unredacted files.

    Blanche accused Massie of sensationalizing his findings, saying for example that while the name of Les Wexner was redacted in a portion of the files naming him an Epstein co-conspirator, he "already appears in the files thousands of times."
    "DOJ is hiding nothing," he said in his posts. "Be honest, and stop grandstanding."

Driving the news: Following allegations of improper redactions in the more than 3 million files it released on Epstein, the Justice Department has begun giving members of Congress access to the unredacted files.

    Starting with Judiciary Committee members, lawmakers have access to the files on terminals at DOJ headquarters from 9am to 6pm ET, Monday through Friday.
    Several lawmakers, including Raskin, Massie, and Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Becca Balint (D-Vt.), viewed the files on Monday.

What they're saying: But it's about more than one email, Raskin stressed, exclaiming that the Mar-a-Lago exchange is "just one memo out of 3 million!"

    "The idea that we could get through a meaningful fraction of them is just ridiculous," he said.

    "I mean, there's tons of redacted stuff. ... And [Trump's] name, I think I put his name, and it appears more than a million times. So it's all over the place."

Following publication of this story, Raskin clarified in a statement to Axios, "In the database, I typed in the words 'Trump,' 'Donald or Don' and it came up with more than a million results."

    "I obviously didn't have the time to review each one, and I obviously cannot guarantee that every mention of a Donald is Donald Trump as opposed to some other Donald."
    Raskin said the Mar-a-Lago exchange was "one of the first documents I came across."
    He added that "the DOJ database review tool given to Members is confusing, unreliable, and clunky."

The bottom line: "To me, this whole rollout of saying that members can come from nine to five to sit at those four computers, is just part of the coverup," Raskin asserted.

    The 3 million documents that the administration has not publicly released "are the ones I'd like to see," he said.
    "The administration says that these are duplicative. Well go ahead and release them then! If they're duplicative, what's the problem? We'll be the judge of that."

Editor's note: This story has been updated with additional comments from Raskin for clarification.


You're welcome.  Smiley
Back to top
 

** Repeat Covid infections exercise our immune system in the same way that repeat concussions exercise our brain **
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print