Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 12:07pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote Yesterday at 11:28am:
Yes.
Maxwell is one of the most prolific child traffickers and rapists in modern history. She deserves to rot in prison for the rest of her life. There is nothing she can do to wipe her slate clean.
Given the leverage she currently has over the President and her readiness to lie in pursuit of a pardon, mere words aren't enough. Her testimony would need to produce convictions, actual accountability for the people she supplied children to for abuse, before any consideration of clemency.
This isn't petty theft from a corner store. This is organised child trafficking for the express purpose of sexual abuse, torture, and murder.
She is lucky to still be breathing, and she should remain behind bars until justice is served.
Your mentality - your lust for vengeance against someone who
was little more than a travel agent for pedos will
mean that 200 pedos will escape the noose.
Little more than a travel agent for pedos?!
Calling Ghislaine Maxwell a "travel agent for pedos" isn't just inaccurate, it's a deliberate minimisation of crimes that a jury found proven beyond reasonable doubt.
Maxwell is in federal prison because she recruited, groomed, transported, and delivered underage girls to Jeffrey Epstein for sexual abuse. She wasn't a passive intermediary or logistics assistant. She actively identified vulnerable minors, gained their trust, normalised sexual abuse, instructed them, and facilitated their repeated rape. That is not travel coordination, it is hands-on participation in organised child trafficking.
Prosecutors demonstrated that Maxwell was a central organiser and enabler in Epstein's operation. Without her recruitment, grooming, and management of victims, the abuse network does not function. That is why she was convicted and sentenced to decades in prison.
The argument you're making also collapses on its own logic. Trading freedom for testimony from a convicted child trafficker who has every incentive to lie, particularly when that testimony conveniently "clears" a sitting President, is not justice. It is corruption. If the goal were accountability, the standard would be evidence, documents, corroboration, and convictions of other abusers, not unverifiable claims from someone bargaining for her own release.
What's genuinely disturbing here is not "vengeance", it's the eagerness to sanitise Maxwell's role and reframe her as a minor functionary in order to justify leniency. That raises an obvious question: why are you so invested in downplaying the crimes of a convicted child trafficker, and so comfortable with the idea that she should be rewarded for saying what powerful people want to hear?
Forum
Pages: 
