aquascoot wrote on Feb 9
th, 2026 at 12:36pm:
Yes Epstein is a pedophile and the world is a better place without him
But he can provide a wealth of insights if he is studied and not just used by chodes to feel "morally superior"
Some insights
1. Whether through training in spycraft or uncanny intuition, Epstein knew how to make people feel way more trusting of him then they should have.
2 for example, the number 2politician in the cameron government , felt ok to be photographed in his underwear.
Andrew felt ok to be photographed hovering over a young woman.
3 Richard branson felt enough trust to say " should I bring my harem or just avail myself of yours".
Elon asked about when was the next party
4. Bill did a tour of Africa with Epstein. Epstein took hundreds of pics.
If you look at those Bill never looked more relaxed and happy.
5. Fergie expressed her love. She asked Epstein to propose to her.she revealed intimate details including that her father ( probably an abuser) called her GB. Ginger bush
6 many of the young women appear to have expressed their love for him.
On the night of his death , it seems he spent 2 hours on the phone to a girl he had been in relationship with since she was 14.
7 gates, Larry page, Richard dawkiins, thecrownprince of Norway. He seemed to have their complete trust DESPITE being a convicted sex offender.
One of the things the chodes do not understand is that it really is " lonely at the top"
And people starved of physical touch , for instance, wither away.
Bill Clinton and gates both had quite cold partners.
I am sure Epstein realized..
Aha...
Massage
Indeed he seemed to use physical touch thru massage as one of his go to strategies.
There are 40,000 images of the rich and famous being massaged.
The chode doesn't realize how much the lonely politician or tech billionaires ( thielle, musk ) crave this.
It appears he got to mendelson by 2 gifts worth about 20 grand .
Why would a super rich guy respond to that?
Because a politician gets nothing but hate from his constituents, so a nice gesture stands out.
An insight for the chodes...if you want a politicians help, maybe give him something nice instead of the usual hate.
Epstein, it seems, learnt how to understand what people needed and play to that.
Sure, for Saudi princes and Dubai executives it was underage girls.
But for scientists , it was their egos, getting to come and meet George clooney or Leo decaprio at lunch .
Imagine working 80 hrs a week for years in a lab. You would crave a little fame.
The tech bros were probably nerds at school bordering on incel .of course they want some hot chicks around.
Politicians just want to get away from their nagging hateful entitled voters. He offered that.
He must have been an ace at spy school.
He really knew how to win trust.
The chode should study how he was able to network.
It's a powerful skill.
<snip>
You keep insisting this is some detached sociological exercise, but given your history, nobody should pretend this is being offered in good faith.
Yes, you ritualistically state that Epstein was a paedophile and that the world is better off without him. That sentence is doing an extraordinary amount of laundering for what follows.
What you then present is not analysis, it is rationalisation. You take a child rape enterprise and reframe it as a case study in elite loneliness, ego management, and networking psychology. That shift matters. It moves responsibility away from the abuser and his enablers and towards a narrative where exploitation becomes an almost understandable by-product of unmet emotional needs.
The pattern is familiar.
Every time Epstein comes up, you don't interrogate the adults who knowingly associated with a convicted sex offender, you empathise with them. Lonely, burnt out, touch-starved, misunderstood geniuses. Somehow the only people who don't get interiority in your story are the children.
You speculate endlessly about Bill Gates' emotional state, Fergie's sexuality, scientists' egos, politicians' resentment of voters, yet you treat systemic abuse as background noise. That is not neutral analysis. That is a moral reordering where the comfort of powerful adults is foregrounded and the harm to minors is abstracted away.
And let's be clear, Epstein's "skill" was not networking. It was predation enabled by wealth, power, and institutional cowardice. He did not discover a clever hack for winning trust. He exploited the fact that elite circles will tolerate almost anything, including known child abuse, so long as access, flattery, and deniability are preserved.
Framing this as something "the chodes should study" is particularly grotesque. What exactly is the lesson here? That if you massage enough egos and supply enough bodies, the abuse becomes comprehensible? That predators should be admired for operational competence?
Given your track record of minimising, deflecting, and reframing responsibility whenever Epstein's associates are mentioned, nobody is obliged to treat this as curiosity rather than apologetics. If you genuinely wanted to understand Epstein, you would start with why so many powerful adults chose to look away from the abuse of children, not with how lonely billionaires felt while doing it.
Forum
Pages: 
