The People As Sovereign - as advanced into the twenty first century - means that EVERY citizen has the right to rule - not the politicians etc.
I've discussed the faults of 'sovereign citizenship' with you already - get your minds around it all.
Essentially at the end of the day we have the right to reject unjust laws - an unust law being no law at all - tyranny, discrimination, abuse of office, removal of equal rights (to BE a right a right must apply equally to everyone), and outright preference to some over others =nepotism in favour of the insiders - the chosen ones.
We can even reject injustice etc in the same way as the US Declaration of Independence did......
"But, when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object (abolition of the Forms to which the populace are accustomed), evinces a Design to reduce them under Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
Here is an example:-
Peasant 1:- “Oo are you then?”
Albo:- “I am your Great Leader, and I bring you the Indigenous Voice!”
Peasant 1:- “Oo created this Indigenous Voice then? What's it based on?”
Albo (heavenly music):- “The Great Serpent, filled with the power of the seas and the skies and the thunder and lightning in the clouds, came down from Heaven, and using his great body, carved the hills and river courses, and then dying, his mighty ribs created the mountains and his bones the Indigenous People to be custodians over the land and gave them a Voice over all in the land which must be restored to them ….......”
Peasant 2:- “Some failed herpetological experiment is no basis on which to form a valid argument to develop a multi-layered government by changing the Constitution! True government comes from a mandate of the masses, willingly given and fully informed! We're a semi-autonomous, quasi-anarchic egalitarian assemblage of rules-bound free individuals who vote every three years on our elected representatives, who then sit down and natter out the best way forward, and if we disagree with them we can write to them or vote them out next time around, or even refuse to abide by their dictates under the guiding principle that 'an unjust law – (or decision or policy for that matter) thanks, Reg – is no law - (or decision or policy for that matter) – thanks again, Reg - at all'!
We don't need no Voices in our heads telling us what to do!!”