Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
The land title (Read 174 times)
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 14514
Armidale
Gender: male
The land title
Feb 3rd, 2026 at 7:57pm
 
The constitution still has s 74 which allows some court appeals to the Privy Council. This is despite efforts to block all links with UK.  The Judicial Committee of Privy Council of King Charles III consists of Justices of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom and senior judges from the Commonwealth.
Recent/Current Judges (Feb 2026 hearings): Chairman - Lord Reed. Lord Hodge, Lord Briggs, Lord Burrows, Lady Rose, Lord Richards, Lady Simler, and Lord Doherty.
Function: The JCPC hears appeals and makes reports to His Majesty in Council.

Then Lord Reed as Chairman can in theory advise the monarch on royal decisions for Australia, which places Reed above the Gov General in hierarchy.  Reed has an undemocratic appointment and can't sit in the House of Lords, being a judge.  He is not royalty and not a president. Technically, king and judge own Australia, but someone has to.
Back to top
« Last Edit: Yesterday at 6:38am by chimera »  
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 14514
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: The land title
Reply #1 - Yesterday at 9:13am
 
By convention, the monarch follows the advice from his organisations of state. Then Lord Reed has supreme policy responsibility for Australia.  He hasn't even got the EU above him, just Guterres.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16474
Gender: male
Re: The land title
Reply #2 - Yesterday at 9:29am
 
chimera wrote on Feb 3rd, 2026 at 7:57pm:
Then Lord Reed as Chairman can in theory advise the monarch on royal decisions for Australia, which places Reed above the Gov General in hierarchy.  Reed has an undemocratic appointment and can't sit in the House of Lords, being a judge.  He is not royalty and not a president. Technically, king and judge own Australia, but someone has to.

So, the Privy Council in Australia, bad, then.

It's easy to forget that institutions like the monarchy and the Privy Council are ancient, predating democracy by centuries.

The monarchy, and all the ancient institutions attached to it, have been gradually fudged to fit increasingly more democratic governance since the Glorious Revolution of 1688; from the end of monarchical divine right to rule to modern constitutional monarchy.

Some of the last vestiges of ancient monarchy are: the reserve powers (whatever they are) and the Privy Council.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 14514
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: The land title
Reply #3 - Yesterday at 9:39am
 
The constitution says the heirs of the Queen (Victoria) are sovereign in UK. So 'king of Oz' is bad words. He is king of Gt Britain bless her socks with Reserve Power to send his UK Army and cricketers overseas, if needed to enforce Lord Reed's advice.
Will Reed accept AUKUS if it resists him?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16474
Gender: male
Re: The land title
Reply #4 - Yesterday at 9:45am
 
chimera wrote Yesterday at 9:39am:
The constitution says the heirs of the Queen (Victoria) are sovereign in UK. So 'king of Oz' is bad words. He is king of Gt Britain bless her socks with Reserve Power to send his UK Army and cricketers overseas, if needed to enforce Lord Reed's advice.
Will he accept AUKUS if it resists him?

Charles III is the King of Australia by proclamation.

By convention, the king of Australia must accept the advice of his Australian vice-regal, who must, in his turn, accept the advice of the Australian prime minister.

Any chance an Australian G-G or PM would advise the king to make war on his subjects? The last king who did that was executed.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16474
Gender: male
Re: The land title
Reply #5 - Yesterday at 9:54am
 
There's a reason why statues and images of Oliver Cromwell are placed in institutions and places highly visible to the monarch, Parliamentarians and the people.

A reminder of what happens when a monarch asserts divine right to act contrary to the will of Parliament and, by that, the people.

...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 14514
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: The land title
Reply #6 - Yesterday at 12:08pm
 
MeisterEckhart wrote Yesterday at 9:45am:
Charles III is the King of Australia by proclamation.


Trump can be Oz dictator by proclamation, or the mushroom lady can be. It's a dud. A referendum is needed.

It's not the GGen who is on the Privy Council and he don't bend Charles' ear. Lord Reed does. The British public and Commons gave us the constitution, thanks very much, and they're OK with the royal stuff. Oz convicts aren't decent chaps and poms won't mind sending in the lads to smarten up the colonials.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16474
Gender: male
Re: The land title
Reply #7 - Yesterday at 4:42pm
 
chimera wrote Yesterday at 12:08pm:
MeisterEckhart wrote Yesterday at 9:45am:
Charles III is the King of Australia by proclamation.


Trump can be Oz dictator by proclamation, or the mushroom lady can be. It's a dud. A referendum is needed.

It's not the GGen who is on the Privy Council and he don't bend Charles' ear. Lord Reed does. The British public and Commons gave us the constitution, thanks very much, and they're OK with the royal stuff. Oz convicts aren't decent chaps and poms won't mind sending in the lads to smarten up the colonials.

Yep... and the Indonesians could claim northern Australia as Indonesian territory, citing ancient Indonesian peoples' links to the region... And the Chinese could take a slice, claiming discovery of Australia before the Europeans... And the French could reclaim south-west Australia... And the Dutch could carve off bits of the north... And NZ Maoris could grab a slab of NSW, claiming one of their canoes drifted there in 1300, which explains their recent mass migration to Queensland and NSW. 

And it's all gonna happen... watch this space...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 14514
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: The land title
Reply #8 - Yesterday at 5:06pm
 
Could be. Maybe not. The thing is that as it stands now, Oz is solidly and legally much the same as in 1901.  There is a string reaching from the throne, at Spur Road London, to the High Court of Oz at 31 Parkes Place East, Canberra. Lord Reed holds this in his imperial grip like a dog handler. However its effect is limited and scarcely noticed. Monarchists tell themselves it's an Australian monarchy and if it works for them...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
MeisterEckhart
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 16474
Gender: male
Re: The land title
Reply #9 - Yesterday at 5:25pm
 
chimera wrote Yesterday at 5:06pm:
Could be. Maybe not. The thing is that as it stands now, Oz is solidly and legally much the same as in 1901.  There is a string reaching from the throne, at Spur Road London, to the High Court of Oz at 31 Parkes Place East, Canberra. Lord Reed holds this in his imperial grip like a dog handler. However its effect is limited and scarcely noticed. Monarchists tell themselves it's an Australian monarchy and if it works for them...

And what a bloody mess we're in because of it...

Sure, it's the 2nd-wealthiest country in the world for median wealth per adult...  5th globally for average wealth per adult ... 8th in the world as a millionaire hub... with one of the most equitable wealth distributions among developed nations...

And yet... yer can't buy recreational marijuana from Chemist Warehouse... Poms... what a disaster of a people.

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 14514
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: The land title
Reply #10 - Yesterday at 5:33pm
 
There are 11.5 million houses (apart from units) at average $1mill. or $11 trillion owned by C Windsor. There are some holes with stuff in them also. James Cook was on to something but undervalued it at the time, a smart investor. A pom.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 56336
Gender: male
Re: The land title
Reply #11 - Yesterday at 5:42pm
 
MeisterEckhart wrote Yesterday at 5:25pm:
chimera wrote Yesterday at 5:06pm:
Could be. Maybe not. The thing is that as it stands now, Oz is solidly and legally much the same as in 1901.  There is a string reaching from the throne, at Spur Road London, to the High Court of Oz at 31 Parkes Place East, Canberra. Lord Reed holds this in his imperial grip like a dog handler. However its effect is limited and scarcely noticed. Monarchists tell themselves it's an Australian monarchy and if it works for them...

And what a bloody mess we're in because of it...

Sure, it's the 2nd-wealthiest country in the world for median wealth per adult...  5th globally for average wealth per adult ... 8th in the world as a millionaire hub... with one of the most equitable wealth distributions among developed nations...

And yet... yer can't buy recreational marijuana from Chemist Warehouse... Poms... what a disaster of a people.




Yeah! Look at the Germans and the French!
They had a dozen constitutions between them since 1901. We've had only the ONE!  Cry Cry
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
chimera
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 14514
Armidale
Gender: male
Re: The land title
Reply #12 - Yesterday at 5:49pm
 
Frank wrote Yesterday at 5:42pm:
We've had only the ONE! 

President Hawke gave us the 1986 Constitution after he won the America's Cup in 1983 with Australia II.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print