Do you actually believe that you have the right to do something, even if the consistent and predictable result of doing it is someone trying to kill you - because pieces of paper trump reality?

freediver wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2026 at 1:01pm:


You don't have the "right" to do something likely to egregiously affect other people; rather  the law (written on paper..) - infomed by 'moralilty, justice and fairness' -  should prescribe relevant behaviours, and be your guide.

chimera wrote on Feb 2^nd, 2026 at 5:48pm:


See - you conclusion is garbage, as expected.

Do you think some guy - eg, who says the zionist lobby is evil - has commited a crime?

As to the behaviour of others who heard him, it's up to the government   to clearly outline the limits of the zioinist lobby, and loudy condemn the genocidal jewish state, both here and at the UN.

An action would would defuse those who think they must take illegal actions into their own hands.

Instead  Albo who  can't anaylize clearly  has invited the President of a genocidal  state to Oz....while the relatives of many victims of that genocide are living in Oz.   

LOL. If only we had the CCP to tell us what to think, everything would be perfect.

thegreatdivide wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2026 at 2:53pm:

Don't go there... he thinks rights come from mines in South Africa.

chimera wrote on Feb 3^rd, 2026 at 3:50pm:


Me - and everyone else (ie not 2 "conspiring" people ).


Now, are you capable of explaining whether  the alleged 'neo nazi' has comitted "hate speech" or not, on the basis of the clip we heard ? 

Bobby and I are still wondering....

You might need a dictionary if it is still too complicated for you.

Do you actually believe that you have the right to do something, even if the consistent and predictable result of doing it is someone trying to kill you - because pieces of paper trump reality?