
I think you’ll find Lister’s story most compelling, and an important expose of how our justice system is being hijacked by feminist ideology determined to take down prominent men. It’s very important you help me promote it so that Lister’s innocence is well publicised.
It is simply outrageous that our media has failed so dismally to expose how the evidence of these complainants was roundly rejected by a jury. The media naturally failed to report that several complainants were confronted with proof that their version of events was untrue in devastating cross-examination by Margaret Cunneen SC.
The one-eyed journalists – from the ABC, the Sydney Morning Herald (SMH), The Guardian and the like – crusaded against a suppression order which was imposed to protect Lister’s identity, long after the news of his arrest had been broadcast worldwide. Eventually that suppression order was lifted but the judge, Michael John King, took the very unusual step of commenting on the unbalanced coverage of the case, which failed to include all Lister’s acquittals in earlier trials. He mentioned he was so disappointed in the SMH that he had just cancelled his subscription!
Astoundingly a SMH journalist said in court she wasn’t interested in covering the verdict if Lister were to be acquitted. And sure enough, despite years of story after story reporting allegations, arrests and charges, the paper has refused to publish the fact that the jury ultimately threw it all out.
The current slogan being used to advertise the Sydney Morning Herald is “Here’s to Reason” – claiming to make a “powerful statement on the value of balanced, responsible journalism in a deeply polarised world.” What a joke!
https://quadrant.org.au/news-opinions/feminism/when-a-verdict-scuttles-the-narra...