Australian Politics Forum

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 149654
Gender: male

Re: the maga cult
Reply #15 - Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:06pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 1:45pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 1:08pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:42am:

maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic.

maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed.

.
@TriciaOhio : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are."

Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration.

https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410

Prove it.

Frank: can you prove it?

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 56169
Gender: male

Re: the maga cult
Reply #16 - Jan 17^th, 2026 at 5:05pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:06pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 1:45pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 1:08pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:42am:

maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic.

maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed.

.
@TriciaOhio : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are."

Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration.

https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410

Prove it.

Frank: can you prove it?

The question was, dreadful liar:

Why don't you, your fellow TDS kids and the woke prog media EVER talk about that? ABout the huge benefit that removal of criminals and illegals aliens? Never a word from you mongs on that.

Why? Why is it more important to prevent the remooval of criminal and illegal aiens than the removal itself??

Because ALL you buggers think like Hamas and Al Shabaab - sacrific the innocent civian victims to those criminals just to spite Trump day in day out. Another effect of 7 October.

Dreadful.

Why don't you lot start multiple threads on ghe benefits over removing illegal crims?
Why do you, despicable creepy peccary = skunk pig, immediately swing into dissembing action?

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21748
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: the maga cult
Reply #17 - Jan 17^th, 2026 at 5:20pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:04pm:

You invoked CNN's supposed failure to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" being taken off the streets.

So I'm asking you something very simple, and very specific.

In your view, how many of the people ICE detains and "takes off the street" need to actually be killers, rapists, or human traffickers before it becomes notable enough to warrant reporting?

What percentage, in your mind, would make it undeniable that these are the people ICE is primarily targeting?

And separately, what percentage of detainees falling into that category would you personally require before judging ICE's operations to be a success?

80%?

What about the standard pass mark, 50%?

Surely you don't need to keep running from this question?

Please don't forget about my questions from the previous page please Frank.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 149654
Gender: male

Re: the maga cult
Reply #18 - Jan 17^th, 2026 at 5:21pm

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 5:05pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:06pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 1:45pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 1:08pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:42am:

maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic.

maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed.

.
@TriciaOhio : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are."

Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration.

https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410

Prove it.

Frank: can you prove it?

The question was, dreadful liar:

Why don't you, your fellow TDS kids and the woke prog media EVER talk about that? ABout the huge benefit that removal of criminals and illegals aliens? Never a word from you mongs on that.

Why? Why is it more important to prevent the remooval of criminal and illegal aiens than the removal itself??

Because ALL you buggers think like Hamas and Al Shabaab - sacrific the innocent civian victims to those criminals just to spite Trump day in day out. Another effect of 7 October.

Dreadful.

Why don't you lot start multiple threads on ghe benefits over removing illegal crims?
Why do you, despicable creepy peccary = skunk pig, immediately swing into dissembing action?

I'll take that as a 'no'.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 56169
Gender: male

Re: the maga cult
Reply #19 - Jan 17^th, 2026 at 6:50pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 5:20pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:04pm:

You invoked CNN's supposed failure to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" being taken off the streets.

So I'm asking you something very simple, and very specific.

In your view, how many of the people ICE detains and "takes off the street" need to actually be killers, rapists, or human traffickers before it becomes notable enough to warrant reporting?

What percentage, in your mind, would make it undeniable that these are the people ICE is primarily targeting?

And separately, what percentage of detainees falling into that category would you personally require before judging ICE's operations to be a success?

80%?

What about the standard pass mark, 50%?

Surely you don't need to keep running from this question?

Please don't forget about my questions from the previous page please Frank.

Why does the percentage matter? ICE is tasked with removing illegals. That's the job. What percentage of illegals is also criminal does not change the task.

I see what you are trying to do, teapot. You want to normalise illegal immigration, trying to make it out that ICE should not be tasked with enforcing immigration law but do the job of state police and only focus on criminal illegals - because the sanctuary state, sanctuary city Dem police forces can't be fagged with doing that.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 56169
Gender: male

Re: the maga cult
Reply #20 - Jan 17^th, 2026 at 7:00pm

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 5:21pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 5:05pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:06pm:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 1:45pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 1:08pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:42am:

maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic.

maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed.

.
@TriciaOhio : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are."

Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration.

https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410

Prove it.

Frank: can you prove it?

The question was, dreadful liar:

Why don't you, your fellow TDS kids and the woke prog media EVER talk about that? ABout the huge benefit that removal of criminals and illegals aliens? Never a word from you mongs on that.

Why? Why is it more important to prevent the remooval of criminal and illegal aiens than the removal itself??

Because ALL you buggers think like Hamas and Al Shabaab - sacrific the innocent civian victims to those criminals just to spite Trump day in day out. Another effect of 7 October.

Dreadful.

Why don't you lot start multiple threads on ghe benefits over removing illegal crims?
Why do you, despicable creepy peccary = skunk pig, immediately swing into dissembing action?

I'll take that as a 'no'.

Well, lying creep, you and the TDS kids are our eyes and ears for what the lefty media like CNN cover on ICE and none of you have ever once brought up the benefits of removing illegals, especially criminal illegals, as discussed on CNN et al. So I assume that they are not covering it at all, otherwise you would be telling us about it, wouldn't you?

You wouldnt be applying your own, additional lefty propagandist filter and focus, obsessively, just on the bollocks, would you?

Of course you would. That is thed whole point of your existence, ditto all the TDs kids. You are just the creepiest, most dishonest of the lot.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21748
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: the maga cult
Reply #21 - Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:25pm

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 6:50pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 5:20pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:04pm:

You invoked CNN's supposed failure to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" being taken off the streets.

So I'm asking you something very simple, and very specific.

In your view, how many of the people ICE detains and "takes off the street" need to actually be killers, rapists, or human traffickers before it becomes notable enough to warrant reporting?

What percentage, in your mind, would make it undeniable that these are the people ICE is primarily targeting?

And separately, what percentage of detainees falling into that category would you personally require before judging ICE's operations to be a success?

80%?

What about the standard pass mark, 50%?

Surely you don't need to keep running from this question?

Please don't forget about my questions from the previous page please Frank.

Why does the percentage matter? ICE is tasked with removing illegals. That's the job. What percentage of illegals is also criminal does not change the task.

I see what you are trying to do, teapot. You want to normalise illegal immigration, trying to make it out that ICE should not be tasked with enforcing immigration law but do the job of state police and only focus on criminal illegals - because the sanctuary state, sanctuary city Dem police forces can't be fagged with doing that.

No, you're having a sook that it's going unreported.

I'm trying to determine your baseline to legitimise this claim.

And surprise surprise, you're refusing to answer.

Shock horror you can't justify a position you've taken...

If you believe in what ICE is doing, if it's not a simple dog whistle response, you should be able to easily answer those questions.

But as is you're current theme, avoidance and abuse is all I get in return.

Are you going to answer the questions or wave more white flags like the bitch you've always been?

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 56169
Gender: male

Re: the maga cult
Reply #22 - Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:37pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:25pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 6:50pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 5:20pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:04pm:

You invoked CNN's supposed failure to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" being taken off the streets.

So I'm asking you something very simple, and very specific.

In your view, how many of the people ICE detains and "takes off the street" need to actually be killers, rapists, or human traffickers before it becomes notable enough to warrant reporting?

What percentage, in your mind, would make it undeniable that these are the people ICE is primarily targeting?

And separately, what percentage of detainees falling into that category would you personally require before judging ICE's operations to be a success?

80%?

What about the standard pass mark, 50%?

Surely you don't need to keep running from this question?

Please don't forget about my questions from the previous page please Frank.

Why does the percentage matter? ICE is tasked with removing illegals. That's the job. What percentage of illegals is also criminal does not change the task.

I see what you are trying to do, teapot. You want to normalise illegal immigration, trying to make it out that ICE should not be tasked with enforcing immigration law but do the job of state police and only focus on criminal illegals - because the sanctuary state, sanctuary city Dem police forces can't be fagged with doing that.

No, you're having a sook that it's going unreported.

I'm trying to determine your baseline to legitimise this claim.

And surprise surprise, you're refusing to answer.

Shock horror you can't justify a position you've taken...

If you believe in what ICE is doing, if it's not a simple dog whistle response, you should be able to easily answer those questions.

But as is you're current theme, avoidance and abuse is all I get in return.

Are you going to answer the questions or wave more white flags like the bitch you've always been?

What baseline, what 'this claim'?

You invented 80% for some reason. Why? Relevance?

What baseline is there for removing illegal aliens?

What the hell are you trying to insinuate but carefully avoid saying? Speak plainly, puff ball.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21748
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: the maga cult
Reply #23 - Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:39pm

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:37pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:25pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 6:50pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 5:20pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:04pm:

You invoked CNN's supposed failure to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" being taken off the streets.

So I'm asking you something very simple, and very specific.

In your view, how many of the people ICE detains and "takes off the street" need to actually be killers, rapists, or human traffickers before it becomes notable enough to warrant reporting?

What percentage, in your mind, would make it undeniable that these are the people ICE is primarily targeting?

And separately, what percentage of detainees falling into that category would you personally require before judging ICE's operations to be a success?

80%?

What about the standard pass mark, 50%?

Surely you don't need to keep running from this question?

Please don't forget about my questions from the previous page please Frank.

Why does the percentage matter? ICE is tasked with removing illegals. That's the job. What percentage of illegals is also criminal does not change the task.

I see what you are trying to do, teapot. You want to normalise illegal immigration, trying to make it out that ICE should not be tasked with enforcing immigration law but do the job of state police and only focus on criminal illegals - because the sanctuary state, sanctuary city Dem police forces can't be fagged with doing that.

No, you're having a sook that it's going unreported.

I'm trying to determine your baseline to legitimise this claim.

And surprise surprise, you're refusing to answer.

Shock horror you can't justify a position you've taken...

If you believe in what ICE is doing, if it's not a simple dog whistle response, you should be able to easily answer those questions.

But as is you're current theme, avoidance and abuse is all I get in return.

Are you going to answer the questions or wave more white flags like the bitch you've always been?

What baseline, what 'this claim'?

You invented 80% for some reason. Why? Relevance?

What baseline is there for removing illegal aliens?

What the hell are you trying to insinuate but carefully avoid saying? Speak plainly, puff ball.

80%, 50%, 1%, I don't care, I just want to know what it is in your opinion.

I'd imagine at least a 50% rste would be the bare minimum, for any scenario.

But it depends on the situation of course. If I were a chef and I only got 80% of the orders correct, I wouldn't be a good chef...

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 56169
Gender: male

Re: the maga cult
Reply #24 - Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:43pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:39pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:37pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:25pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 6:50pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 5:20pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:04pm:

You invoked CNN's supposed failure to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" being taken off the streets.

So I'm asking you something very simple, and very specific.

In your view, how many of the people ICE detains and "takes off the street" need to actually be killers, rapists, or human traffickers before it becomes notable enough to warrant reporting?

What percentage, in your mind, would make it undeniable that these are the people ICE is primarily targeting?

And separately, what percentage of detainees falling into that category would you personally require before judging ICE's operations to be a success?

80%?

What about the standard pass mark, 50%?

Surely you don't need to keep running from this question?

Please don't forget about my questions from the previous page please Frank.

Why does the percentage matter? ICE is tasked with removing illegals. That's the job. What percentage of illegals is also criminal does not change the task.

I see what you are trying to do, teapot. You want to normalise illegal immigration, trying to make it out that ICE should not be tasked with enforcing immigration law but do the job of state police and only focus on criminal illegals - because the sanctuary state, sanctuary city Dem police forces can't be fagged with doing that.

No, you're having a sook that it's going unreported.

I'm trying to determine your baseline to legitimise this claim.

And surprise surprise, you're refusing to answer.

Shock horror you can't justify a position you've taken...

If you believe in what ICE is doing, if it's not a simple dog whistle response, you should be able to easily answer those questions.

But as is you're current theme, avoidance and abuse is all I get in return.

Are you going to answer the questions or wave more white flags like the bitch you've always been?

What baseline, what 'this claim'?

You invented 80% for some reason. Why? Relevance?

What baseline is there for removing illegal aliens?

What the hell are you trying to insinuate but carefully avoid saying? Speak plainly, puff ball.

80%, 50%, 1%, I don't care, I just want to know what it is in your opinion.

What about these percentages? What do they signify? Percentages of what?

It's either 6 paragraphs of emotionally incontinent hyperbolic rant from you or a cryptic crossword question about some mysterious percentages.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Sprintcyclist

Gold Member

Offline

OzPolitic

Posts: 41241
Gender: male

Re: the maga cult
Reply #25 - Jan 17^th, 2026 at 11:36pm

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 1:08pm:

Sprintcyclist wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:42am:

maga 2021 - you can't make me wear a mask during a pandemic, you can't force me to have a vaccine during a pandemic, I won't socially distance during a pandemic.

maga 2026 - just follow the orders, have your papers ready, do everything the masked armed men say and you won't be killed.

.
@TriciaOhio : "In the last five weeks, we have arrested 2,500 criminal illegal aliens off the streets of Minneapolis... I have not seen CNN cover who some of those individuals are."

Killers, rapists, human traffickers — off our streets thanks to the Trump Administration.

https://x.com/RapidResponse47/status/2012202349247201410

..................

there is a cultists reply

Back to top

Modern Classic Right Wing

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21748
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: the maga cult
Reply #26 - Jan 17^th, 2026 at 11:46pm

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:43pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:39pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:37pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:25pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 6:50pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 5:20pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:04pm:

You invoked CNN's supposed failure to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" being taken off the streets.

So I'm asking you something very simple, and very specific.

In your view, how many of the people ICE detains and "takes off the street" need to actually be killers, rapists, or human traffickers before it becomes notable enough to warrant reporting?

What percentage, in your mind, would make it undeniable that these are the people ICE is primarily targeting?

And separately, what percentage of detainees falling into that category would you personally require before judging ICE's operations to be a success?

80%?

What about the standard pass mark, 50%?

Surely you don't need to keep running from this question?

Please don't forget about my questions from the previous page please Frank.

Why does the percentage matter? ICE is tasked with removing illegals. That's the job. What percentage of illegals is also criminal does not change the task.

I see what you are trying to do, teapot. You want to normalise illegal immigration, trying to make it out that ICE should not be tasked with enforcing immigration law but do the job of state police and only focus on criminal illegals - because the sanctuary state, sanctuary city Dem police forces can't be fagged with doing that.

No, you're having a sook that it's going unreported.

I'm trying to determine your baseline to legitimise this claim.

And surprise surprise, you're refusing to answer.

Shock horror you can't justify a position you've taken...

If you believe in what ICE is doing, if it's not a simple dog whistle response, you should be able to easily answer those questions.

But as is you're current theme, avoidance and abuse is all I get in return.

Are you going to answer the questions or wave more white flags like the bitch you've always been?

What baseline, what 'this claim'?

You invented 80% for some reason. Why? Relevance?

What baseline is there for removing illegal aliens?

What the hell are you trying to insinuate but carefully avoid saying? Speak plainly, puff ball.

80%, 50%, 1%, I don't care, I just want to know what it is in your opinion.

What about these percentages? What do they signify? Percentages of what?

It's either 6 paragraphs of emotionally incontinent hyperbolic rant from you or a cryptic crossword question about some mysterious percentages.

I guess you're too dumb to proceed.

Shocker...

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 149654
Gender: male

Re: the maga cult
Reply #27 - Jan 18^th, 2026 at 7:08am

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:43pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:39pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:37pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 8:25pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 6:50pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 5:20pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 17^th, 2026 at 4:04pm:

You invoked CNN's supposed failure to report on the "killers, rapists, human traffickers" being taken off the streets.

So I'm asking you something very simple, and very specific.

In your view, how many of the people ICE detains and "takes off the street" need to actually be killers, rapists, or human traffickers before it becomes notable enough to warrant reporting?

What percentage, in your mind, would make it undeniable that these are the people ICE is primarily targeting?

And separately, what percentage of detainees falling into that category would you personally require before judging ICE's operations to be a success?

80%?

What about the standard pass mark, 50%?

Surely you don't need to keep running from this question?

Please don't forget about my questions from the previous page please Frank.

Why does the percentage matter? ICE is tasked with removing illegals. That's the job. What percentage of illegals is also criminal does not change the task.

I see what you are trying to do, teapot. You want to normalise illegal immigration, trying to make it out that ICE should not be tasked with enforcing immigration law but do the job of state police and only focus on criminal illegals - because the sanctuary state, sanctuary city Dem police forces can't be fagged with doing that.

No, you're having a sook that it's going unreported.

I'm trying to determine your baseline to legitimise this claim.

And surprise surprise, you're refusing to answer.

Shock horror you can't justify a position you've taken...

If you believe in what ICE is doing, if it's not a simple dog whistle response, you should be able to easily answer those questions.

But as is you're current theme, avoidance and abuse is all I get in return.

Are you going to answer the questions or wave more white flags like the bitch you've always been?

What baseline, what 'this claim'?

You invented 80% for some reason. Why? Relevance?

What baseline is there for removing illegal aliens?

What the hell are you trying to insinuate but carefully avoid saying? Speak plainly, puff ball.

80%, 50%, 1%, I don't care, I just want to know what it is in your opinion.

What about these percentages? What do they signify? Percentages of what?

It's either 6 paragraphs of emotionally incontinent hyperbolic rant from you or a cryptic crossword question about some mysterious percentages.

What about these percentages?

“We’re gonna be reducing drug prices down to a level that nobody – not by 20%, 30% – by like 1,000%. Because, you know, we’re paying sometimes 10 times more than other nations, and we’re not doing it anymore.” He said Monday: “We have something else called ‘favored nations,’ where I’m going to be reducing drug prices by 1,000% – by 900, 600, 500, 1,200.”

Please explain.

Back to top

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 56169
Gender: male

Re: the maga cult
Reply #28 - Jan 18^th, 2026 at 9:56am

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 18^th, 2026 at 7:08am: