Excuse me, Brian, here on this board, we like Danish, thanks.

There is no way we would spinelessly suggest they should hand their territory over to the US.

Such a proposition would be a clear red line. We would never support a prez who threatened to take our ally's territory.

Always absolutely never ever.

Quote:

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 12^th, 2026 at 2:31pm:


So Denmark believe that the people of Greenland have the right to self determination or is it Demark believe they have the right to determine it for them. Hard to tell.

tallowood wrote on Jan 12^th, 2026 at 3:15pm:


Do they teach geography in Russia, Tallow?Sweden's the country next door, dear.

Denmark's the country that sings America's praises and slavishly follows Uncle into every endless war.

Sheesh, they're almost as bad as us Aussies.

We're the country under Papua New Guinea with the Southern Cross in our flag.

Aussie Aussie Aussie, innit.

Leroy wrote on Jan 12^th, 2026 at 4:44pm:


They've been given autonomy, Leroy. They're a self-governing territory.

So, we'll ask again. Do you believe the people of Greenland have the right to self-determination?

A simple yes or no will suffice.

Melanias purse wrote on Jan 12^th, 2026 at 4:47pm:



Dear Karnal,
many blessings.

We have to go back to Yalta in 1945
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yalta_Conference

to see how the big boys carved up the world - all on their own,
they didn't consult anyone - they just did it.

Nothing has changed.
30,000 people in Greenland - a small town's worth -
don't amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world.
The big boys decide.

Bobby. wrote on Jan 12^th, 2026 at 4:52pm:

For a while there, they knocked up a League of Nations then UN.
So now it's back to 1914. Not nice.

57,000 eskimos are not going to decide whether China or Russia or the US or Denmark will control their island that is IN North America and of strategic significance to everyone but them.


Wake the **** up.  It's a colony.  European Nato and the EU are unreliable sell-outs.

Greenland's are in a unique position, they have the opportunity to get a better deal than what they get from Denmark. They have the chance to forge a deal with America which will bring in capital and resources. Realistically they currently rely on America for security as Denmark has very limited capacity and relies on America anyway so its just cutting out the middle man.

So what it all means is if Russia attacks Greenland they have ring Denmark and then Denmark has to ring America and America chases Russia off. What is the purpose of Denmark.

Frank wrote on Jan 12^th, 2026 at 7:49pm:


I say, old chap, do you support the seizure of Greenland?

That's a question.

Melanias purse wrote on Jan 12^th, 2026 at 8:08pm:


You answered your own question.

Melanias purse wrote on Jan 12^th, 2026 at 8:13pm:


Thats their call, I know that Denmark is not impressed, they own the Greenlanders.

Frank wrote on Jan 12^th, 2026 at 9:06pm:


Thats what it all comes too.

Greenlanders are happy with life and feel safe, they have no worries and love their independence, nothing wrong with that is there.

America provides the security that allows the Greenlanders to feel this way, they spend billions on bases in Greenland and the American taxpayer pays for it all.

What if Greenlanders have to deal with Putin themselves, what if they had to build up their military to be able to defend themselves, what if they had to pony up for the navy required for defending Greenland, would they be so happy and free.

Its not America's responsibility to ensure Russia don't acquire more real estate in Europe.

European countries can no longer rely on America to contain Russia, not because America dont want to but because Europe dont want to do the dirty work required to keep the likes of Putin contained.

Anyway America has every right to remind Greenland they need America more than America needs Greenland. Just like Greenlanders have the right to self determination Americans also have the right to self determination when it comes to who they protect and what they want in return for that protection.

America has every right to say to Europe if you want our protection this is what it will cost you, Europe then have the right to reject or accept the offer. This is what Trump is saying, why do the taxpayers of America have to pay for Europe's protection.

Leroy wrote on Jan 12^th, 2026 at 8:18pm:


Of course it's their call. No one would have a problem if they wanted to join Uncle.

We're asking you what their call is. You know.

Say it.

Melanias purse wrote on Jan 12^th, 2026 at 10:10pm:


This is my reply, if you have the ability to focus long enough you will have my answer.

Frank wrote on Jan 12^th, 2026 at 10:14pm:


Oh? They have. By the Danes, by the EU, and yes, dear, as a signatory to every treaty, deal and gentleman's agreement, by Uncle himself.

Your DL does not have a say, but I'm curious.

What do you have against the Eskimos?

Too tinted?

With Alaska and Greenland as great Americans, Canada is looking a bit fake. Who lost the war in 1783 anyway?

US defended Oz in WWII and Albo is about to accept Trump as Australian of the Year Gov General Majesty.

'The President is authorized to take such steps as may be necessary'.
This includes fighting like hell, getting their Greenland back or they won't have one and draining its swamps. Army recruitment posters will show Mr Trump as Uncle Sam pointing his finger at new recruits. Women are to knit socks and send with photos of the President to the boys in the trenches. The Americans are coming!!!

'Mr Trump said Greenland was vital to America's national security and that "without the vast power of the United States … NATO would not be an effective force or deterrent" to Russia and China.'

It's expected that when Putin invades, he will be offered all the parts he hasn't yet seized and the Kingdom of Denmark. This will be joined to Ukraine and form a corridor to Moscow for mineral transport from Greenland.

'President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social on January 8 that he would ask Congress for a $1.5 trillion defense budget'.

This will defend Trump assets at Pentagon, Venezuela Oil, Epstein Island, Trump Tower, Gulf of Trump and Trump (Ch-Ina).

Brian Ross wrote on Jan 16^th, 2026 at 9:29am:


BRUSSELS — Amid the looming threat of a U.S. military takeover of Greenland, NATO requested emergency aid from the U.S. to help it defend Greenland from the U.S.

"This is an emergency, and we need the aid of the United States as soon as possible," said Secretary General Mark Rutte. "The U.S. could attack Greenland at any minute, and we have no ability to defend it unless we get some military aid from the U.S. immediately."

Europe had already begun building up Greenland's defences to 12 soldiers, 3 dog sled teams, and a fishing boat equipped with a harpoon, but experts expressed fear that it may not be enough to fend off America's military unless they get some help from America's military.

"Trump must fulfill his NATO commitment and send us American troops before American troops arrive," said EU leader Ursula von der Leyen. "If he doesn't, we'll call him racist."

"We know you wouldn't want that."

Trump was quick to respond, but suggested he would probably just send the "4th-rate loser weaking soldiers" and the "fatties."

At publishing time, NATO had further bolstered Greenland's defenses by sending a horde of muslim migrants.

Quote:


Arctic fox looks happy that more meat is coming.

Snow ripen tomatoes look and taste good.

Twelve people were killed and 90 civilians, including six children, were injured in a large-scale Russian missile and drone attack on Kyiv.  Russian missiles and military vehicles produce varied smoke exhaust due to factors like older engine tech burning fuel inefficiently (black smoke), toxic *hypergolic fuels creating reddish/brown plumes (nitrogen dioxide) or deliberate smoke screens for concealment. These cause health effects.

*hypergolic: hydrazine derivatives (like MMH/UDMH) as fuel and nitrogen tetroxide (NTO) as the oxidizer and they are highly toxic.

Children, read this and do it.

'Self-reported data from 375 early and mid-adolescent school children in a Siberian city estimated a prevalence of child abuse at 28.9%'

ha ha ha 
not

There must be a number of poofs in Russia?

A straight line is a fundamental concept in geometry: an infinitely long, one-dimensional path with no width, depth, or curves, representing the shortest distance between two points, often expressed as \(y=mx+c\) (slope-intercept form).

Answers can be straight or not.