I'm especially frustrated that Minnesota lawmakers immediately condemned ICE officers for attempting to restore law and order to Minneapolis. It seems like they learned little from the costly aftermath of George Floyd's murder and are eager to whip up Minnesotans into a riotous state of reactive, angry people to defend their progressive ideology

Video angles of the incident have allowed for multiple interpretations of the incident. I will go ahead and give mine. Good is trying to flee the scene in her vehicle and appears to attempt to ram her car into an officer, who is trying to enforce federal law. The ICE officer then draws his gun and shoots her − fatally.

Amy Swearer, senior legal fellow at Advancing American Freedom and a Second Amendment expert, posted on X that she thinks it was "obviously a legally justified use of deadly force by a law enforcement officer."

Again, this is awful, but it is disingenuous at best to frame what happened simply as though Good was a mother killed by an ICE officer as she was out for a leisurely Sunday drive. Good was directly interfering with federal law enforcement operations and posed a threat, namely because she was driving a massive vehicle.

This does not mean that she "deserved" to die or that the ICE agent should have employed lethal force. It just means I can see how the agent fired upon her car, and I am struggling to understand why Good was interfering with ICE agents.

This was entirely preventable.

The best way to prevent being shot at by a federal agent is not to interfere in their duties while they are actively trying to enforce the law.

In order to maintain law and order, law enforcement must maintain authority, or we will soon live in a lawless land.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2026/01/08/ice-agent-minneapoli...

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9^th, 2026 at 12:01pm:



Nonsense - it's a fact.   

Bobby. wrote on Jan 9^th, 2026 at 12:06pm:


I told you yesterday that things were only going to get worse.

During the course of this year we'll be talking about dozens of innocent American citizens being murdered by Trump's Brownshirts.

freediver wrote on Jan 9^th, 2026 at 11:41am:


Explain this to me then.  We saw the bullet hole in the windscreen.  In order to achieve this he had to be in one of 2 places,



So he was either in immediate danger, in which case it was very unlikely that his first shot would have hit the target without some freaky ricochet.

Or, as you say, he moved out of the way, was no longer in immediate danger, and then fired 3 shots from outside the path of the car.

If he missed the first shot, that means the 2 shots he took from the side of the car, leaning in through the driver's window, were completely uncalled for.

If he moved out of the way to take the first kill shot, then he was no longer in danger.

At a bare minimum, the subsequent 2 shots were excessive.

But your explanation is on shaky ground.

He was either justified in the first shot he missed, or if he hit her with it, he took the shot off to the side, no longer in the path of the car.

Or are you going with, if you move a car near law enforcement, they can light you up, full immunity?

greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 9^th, 2026 at 12:17pm:



But it sounds to me like she was blocking the road and interfering
with the work of ICE agents as they were getting rid of criminals.
Then - she almost ran over one of their agents.
I would say she got what was coming to her.
You don't bring a car to a gun fight. 

Pecca,

Bobby. wrote on Jan 9^th, 2026 at 12:15pm:


Biden did that