Armchair_Politician wrote on Jan 8
th, 2026 at 7:45am:
Would forum admins please ban Yadda
until he stops posting the unreadable garbage he's been submitting,
like the above???
Armchair_Politician,
Hey !!
I also have >> an opinion, << you know !
ANOTHER YADDA OPINION;OzPol is a open public forum, where all people [
individuals] are permitted, to express their POV.
......and that [it seems].....is so, so, abhorrent to some people.
While, those same persons would claim....
that THEY [themselves] ought to have a right to express.....their own POV.
For example, ....yourself.
Armchair_Politician,
Q.
What makes YOU so 'special' ???
ARGUMENT;An [open] public political forum would become largely irrelevant,
if only a one 'particular type' of opinion in that forum,
were tolerated [i.e. for examination, by others].
particular = = n. an individual item, as contrasted with a universal quality.Armchair_Politician,
If you truly prefer a political environment, where only ONE perspective/opinion is
permitted TOLERATED,
i suggest, that you choose, to LEAVE AUSTRALIA,
and go and live, for example, in a place like North Korea, or Venezuela, or Iran.
Those are places where
the local secret police, seek to monitor
and to 'moderate' the private opinions of all their citizens.
i.e.
'moderate'.....by arresting persons whose opinions may 'threaten' the 'predominant' opinions of the local ruling oligarchy.
oligarchy = = a small group of people having control of a state. a state governed by such a group.Armchair_Politician,
Q.Would someone like yourself enjoy living under authoritarian rule,
where, perhaps, YOU [too], would not be permitted to express YOUR own opinions and views ?
ARGUMENT;If an individual, has no right [
in law] to
openly express an 'unpopular' or a 'challenging' opinion,
then, imo, they have no real [personal] freedom, and no [personal] liberty.
Yadda said....
Quote:
If an individual has no right [in law] to openly and publicly express himself/herself [his/her views],
that individual has no freedom.
He is a slave to the dictates of his master ['the restraining power'],
in what he may say or express.
He is less than a serf.
In Australia, we are
still permitted to exercise
independent [and lawful] choice.
IMO, that is a good thing.
.
John 3:19
And this is the condemnation,
that light is come into the world,
and men loved darkness rather than light,
because their deeds were evil.
20
For every one that doeth evil hateth the light,
neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.
21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light,
that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
2 Timothy 3:1
This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.
2 For men shall be lovers of their own selves, covetous, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy,
3 Without natural affection, trucebreakers, false accusers, incontinent, fierce, despisers of those that are good,
4 Traitors, heady, highminded, lovers of pleasures more than lovers of God;
5 Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof: from such turn away.
6 For of this sort are they which creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with divers lusts,
7 Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.