Daves2017 wrote on Dec 30
th, 2025 at 9:12am:
Well you never marched over it despite your claims.
It’s on record the police turned you back but never ruin a good lie by saying the truth?
? indeed.....
(google)
Estimates for the number of people who marched over the Sydney Harbour Bridge in support of Palestine in August 2025 vary, with police estimating around 90,000 people and organizers claiming closer to 300,000 people.
Police estimate:
New South Wales police estimated the crowd size at approximately 90,000 people. Acting Deputy Commissioner Peter McKenna noted it was a "perilous situation" due to the unexpectedly large crowd, which exceeded their initial plans.
Organizers' estimate:
The Palestine Action Group, which organized the "March for Humanity," claimed the attendance was much higher, with estimates ranging from 200,000 to 300,000 people.
Independent expert estimate:
A crowd safety expert, Dr. Aldo Raineri from Central Queensland University, analyzed drone footage and estimated the figure to be between 225,000 and 300,000, aligning more closely with the organizers' figures.
The large turnout made it one of the biggest protests in Sydney's history, comparable to the anti-Iraq war protest in 2003 and the Walk for Reconciliation in 2000. Quote:My question is given the subsequent terror attack by Palestinian supporters ( like yourself) do you think that your actions have contributed to this massacre?
Your error:
1. The people who walked accross the bridge were Palestinian-state supporters, not Hamas supporters, so your premise is wrong.
The background:
The UN should have recognized the 2 states in 1948, as per UN res 181, with peace maintained by the UNSC no ifs or buts from trouble-makers on either side.
Decent people want peace NOW even if it's 80 years overdue.
Trump is backsliding: today he said he "differs with Netanyahu over the Palestinian state" - without saying how he would disarm Hamas, which plays into Net's no Palestinian state stance.
Note: Trump COULD begin implementing UN res 181 TODAY, because he would have the support of the other 4 permanent UNSC members, eg
Set up a governing body in Palestine (as designated in UN res 181) with Hamas excluded from government.
Palestine would not need a 'defence' force, because Israel would be subject to UN res 181 as well, with the UNSC performing its originally envisioned peacekeeping role (possible in this particular case because all 5 members would be speaking with one voice; ie defending UN res 181).
Quote:Are you in support of the attack?
No.
Quote:How do you sleep at night?
Very well.