Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 17
Send Topic Print
Minnesota Fraud (Read 3598 times)
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 55862
Gender: male
Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #165 - Jan 7th, 2026 at 7:57am
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6th, 2026 at 5:43pm:
I'm not naming anyone, you're insisting on that to dodge accountability, as usual.

This isn't about a single person, it's about your disgusting pattern. Every time allegations of child sexual abuse come up involving people you support, you deflect, minimise, twist definitions such as underage, and hide behind legalistic nonsense to avoid moral condemnation.

Redirecting to Democrats, arguing over the age of minors and derailing discussions about evidence, all of it is you defending abusers.

That's why I've called it what it is: you defend paedophiles and child abuse.



Not believing your allegations does NOT equal 'supporting pedophiles".


You are playing the same slimey, creepy, slanderous game as gweggy skunk pig and the trouser sniffing son of Pakistan.

You just do it more hysterically.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 149364
Gender: male
Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #166 - Jan 7th, 2026 at 9:41am
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6th, 2026 at 5:43pm:
I'm not naming anyone, you're insisting on that to dodge accountability, as usual.

This isn't about a single person, it's about your disgusting pattern. Every time allegations of child sexual abuse come up involving people you support, you deflect, minimise, twist definitions such as underage, and hide behind legalistic nonsense to avoid moral condemnation.

Redirecting to Democrats, arguing over the age of minors and derailing discussions about evidence, all of it is you defending abusers.

That's why I've called it what it is: you defend paedophiles and child abuse.


I've not seen any of the usual suspects here condemn Epstein & Maxwell.

Why not?   Undecided
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 100476
Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #167 - Jan 7th, 2026 at 10:40am
 
Frank wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 7:57am:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6th, 2026 at 5:43pm:
I'm not naming anyone, you're insisting on that to dodge accountability, as usual.

This isn't about a single person, it's about your disgusting pattern. Every time allegations of child sexual abuse come up involving people you support, you deflect, minimise, twist definitions such as underage, and hide behind legalistic nonsense to avoid moral condemnation.

Redirecting to Democrats, arguing over the age of minors and derailing discussions about evidence, all of it is you defending abusers.

That's why I've called it what it is: you defend paedophiles and child abuse.



Not believing your allegations does NOT equal 'supporting pedophiles".


You are playing the same slimey, creepy, slanderous game as gweggy skunk pig and the trouser sniffing son of Pakistan.

You just do it more hysterically.



Oh, yes it does. You know full well your DL partied with Jeff and his chickie babes for more than ten years.

You know your DL's hiding the Epstein files, you know multiple chicks have made complaints, you know he's paid others off, and you know he's been found liable for sexual abuse.

There's more evidence against your DL than Prince Andrew or Peter Mandelson, and both have been fired and forced into hiding.

So yes, you support, deflect, minimise, twist, lie, deny and then, when you're done, you run for the hills.

No further questions for Frank, leftards.

He's done.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19808
Gender: male
Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #168 - Jan 7th, 2026 at 11:38am
 
Karnal wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 10:40am:
Oh, yes it does. You know full well your DL partied with Jeff and his chickie babes for more than ten years.


And that makes him what exactly? A party goer? Oh the humanity. Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin

What ages were these "chickie babes" at those parties he attended?  Did he do anything with them? Roll Eyes

Huff and bluff don't carry any weight. Wink
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 100476
Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #169 - Jan 7th, 2026 at 2:41pm
 
lee wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 11:38am:
Karnal wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 10:40am:
Oh, yes it does. You know full well your DL partied with Jeff and his chickie babes for more than ten years.


And that makes him what exactly? A party goer?


Exactlemente. Jeff's a great guy to party with, even if he likes his chicks a little on the young side.

Happy birthday, Jeff. May every day be another wonderful secret, eh?
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 149364
Gender: male
Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #170 - Jan 7th, 2026 at 3:23pm
 
lee wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 11:38am:
Karnal wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 10:40am:
Oh, yes it does. You know full well your DL partied with Jeff and his chickie babes for more than ten years.


And that makes him what exactly? A party goer? Oh the humanity.

What ages were these "chickie babes" at those parties he attended?  Did he do anything with them?



7. Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts,sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotionaldistress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the
Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994.

The parties were held by Defendant Epstein at a New York City residence that was being used by Defendant
Epstein at 9 E. 71st St. in Manhattan. During this period, Plaintiff was a minor of age 13 and
was legally incapable under New York law of consenting to sexual intercourse and the other
sexual contacts detailed herein. NY Penal L § 130.05(3)(a). The rapes in the first, second, and
third degrees; sexual misconduct; criminal sexual acts in the first, second, and third degrees;
sexual abuse in the first, second, and third degrees; and forcible touching (and, on information and belief, predatory sexual assault) detailed herein are unlawful under New York law, e.g., NY
Penal L § 130.20-130.52, and 130.55-130.65 (and, on information and belief, 130.95) and
constitute the torts of, inter alia, assault, battery, false imprisonment, and intentional or reckless
infliction of emotional distress, including threats of force and serious bodily harm, under New York law.
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19808
Gender: male
Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #171 - Jan 7th, 2026 at 3:31pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 3:23pm:
7. Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts,sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotionaldistress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the
Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994.



And nothing about Ttrump even being at that particular party. Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 149364
Gender: male
Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #172 - Jan 7th, 2026 at 3:49pm
 
lee wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 3:31pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 3:23pm:
7. Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts,sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the
Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994.



And nothing about Ttrump even being at that particular party. Roll Eyes


9. Plaintiff was enticed by promises of money and a modeling career to attend a
series of parties, with other similarly situated minor females, held at a New York City residence
that was being used by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein.

At least four of the parties were attended by Defendant Trump. Exhs. A and B.

10. Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties.

On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiff to a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff.

During the course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but
with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in
the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A and B.
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
aquascoot
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 37215
Gender: male
Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #173 - Jan 7th, 2026 at 3:54pm
 
Greg can have his truth.
Other people have a different truth.
It's all good.


The staff at JB HI FI  are just collateral damage to Greg's truth
That's where the problem is
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 149364
Gender: male
Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #174 - Jan 7th, 2026 at 3:55pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 3:49pm:
lee wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 3:31pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 3:23pm:
7. Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts,sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the
Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994.



And nothing about Ttrump even being at that particular party. Roll Eyes


9. Plaintiff was enticed by promises of money and a modeling career to attend a
series of parties, with other similarly situated minor females, held at a New York City residence
that was being used by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein.

At least four of the parties were attended by Defendant Trump. Exhs. A and B.

10. Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties.

On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiff to a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff.

During the course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but
with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in
the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A and B.


Plaintiff was a minor of age 13
Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
ProudKangaroo
Gold Member
*****
Offline


The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21639
Meeanjin (Brisbane)
Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #175 - Jan 7th, 2026 at 4:57pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6th, 2026 at 12:23pm:
All these Trump supporters suddenly pretend to care about fraud?

Hahahahahahaha...


Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 149364
Gender: male
Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #176 - Jan 7th, 2026 at 5:00pm
 
ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 4:57pm:
ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6th, 2026 at 12:23pm:
All these Trump supporters suddenly pretend to care about fraud?

Hahahahahahaha...




Lol    Grin   Hypocrites.

Back to top
 

GOP = Guardians Of Paedophiles
 
IP Logged
 
lee
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 19808
Gender: male
Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #177 - Jan 7th, 2026 at 5:40pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 3:55pm:
Plaintiff was a minor of age 13


Ah the allegations. No judgement. No guilt established. Really? Roll Eyes
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 55862
Gender: male
Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #178 - Jan 7th, 2026 at 5:43pm
 
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 3:55pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 3:49pm:
lee wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 3:31pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 3:23pm:
7. Plaintiff was subject to acts of rape, sexual misconduct, criminal sexual acts,sexual abuse, forcible touching, assault, battery, intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress, duress, false imprisonment, and threats of death and/or serious bodily injury by the
Defendants that took place at several parties during the summer months of 1994.



And nothing about Ttrump even being at that particular party. Roll Eyes


9. Plaintiff was enticed by promises of money and a modeling career to attend a
series of parties, with other similarly situated minor females, held at a New York City residence
that was being used by Defendant Jeffrey Epstein.

At least four of the parties were attended by Defendant Trump. Exhs. A and B.

10. Defendant Trump initiated sexual contact with Plaintiff at four different parties.

On the fourth and final sexual encounter with Defendant Trump, Defendant Trump tied Plaintiff to a bed, exposed himself to Plaintiff, and then proceeded to forcibly rape Plaintiff.

During the course of this savage sexual attack, Plaintiff loudly pleaded with Defendant Trump to stop but
with no effect. Defendant Trump responded to Plaintiff’s pleas by violently striking Plaintiff in
the face with his open hand and screaming that he would do whatever he wanted. Exhs. A and B.


Plaintiff was a minor of age 13

The lawsuit was voluntarily dropped by the plaintiff in November 2016, shortly after being refiled.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Karnal
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 100476
Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #179 - Jan 7th, 2026 at 5:43pm
 
lee wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 5:40pm:
greggerypeccary wrote on Jan 7th, 2026 at 3:55pm:
Plaintiff was a minor of age 13


Ah the allegations. No judgement. No guilt established. Really? Roll Eyes


Strange. That's exactly what you said when he was convicted on 34 charges.

RIGGED WITCH HUNT !!!
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 ... 17
Send Topic Print