Australian Politics Forum - Minnesota Fraud

Leroy

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4488
Gender: male

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #150 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:29pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:26pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:23pm:

I think its a fair question sadroo, you have claimed on this board that I defended pedophiles.

It is, but I suspect you will try to weasle out of every example I give you, like your whole underage girl thing earlier.

I'm trying to lay the groundwork first, so we can agree on what defending is, and who the peadophile was.

Is it too much to ask?

There is no groundwork, you just name the pedophile I defended.

Back to top

Trump derangement syndrome
Fareed Zakaria defined the term as "hatred of President Trump so intense that it impairs people's judgment"

Lets check in at 5pm on 23rd July 2025 then at 5pm on 30th July

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21683
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #151 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:43pm

I'm not naming anyone, you're insisting on that to dodge accountability, as usual.

This isn't about a single person, it's about your disgusting pattern. Every time allegations of child sexual abuse come up involving people you support, you deflect, minimise, twist definitions such as underage, and hide behind legalistic nonsense to avoid moral condemnation.

Redirecting to Democrats, arguing over the age of minors and derailing discussions about evidence, all of it is you defending abusers.

That's why I've called it what it is: you defend paedophiles and child abuse.

Back to top

IP Logged

Leroy

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4488
Gender: male

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #152 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:50pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:43pm:

I'm not naming anyone, you're insisting on that to dodge accountability, as usual.

This isn't about a single person, it's about your disgusting pattern. Every time allegations of child sexual abuse come up involving people you support, you deflect, minimise, twist definitions such as underage, and hide behind legalistic nonsense to avoid moral condemnation.

Redirecting to Democrats, arguing over the age of minors and derailing discussions about evidence, all of it is you defending abusers.

That's why I've called it what it is: you defend paedophiles and child abuse.

No you manufactured it because you have TDS, You make allegations that are false or debunked and then claim anyone that points this out to you supports your false and debunked allegations.

Try to be an adult.

But you have opened this door, greg I can ignore due to his mental health issues but you have chosen to be on this path.

Back to top

Trump derangement syndrome
Fareed Zakaria defined the term as "hatred of President Trump so intense that it impairs people's judgment"

Lets check in at 5pm on 23rd July 2025 then at 5pm on 30th July

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 100476

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #153 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 6:25pm

Leroy wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:50pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:43pm:

I'm not naming anyone, you're insisting on that to dodge accountability, as usual.

This isn't about a single person, it's about your disgusting pattern. Every time allegations of child sexual abuse come up involving people you support, you deflect, minimise, twist definitions such as underage, and hide behind legalistic nonsense to avoid moral condemnation.

Redirecting to Democrats, arguing over the age of minors and derailing discussions about evidence, all of it is you defending abusers.

That's why I've called it what it is: you defend paedophiles and child abuse.

No you manufactured it because you have TDS, You make allegations that are false or debunked and then claim anyone that points this out to you supports your false and debunked allegations.

Try to be an adult.

But you have opened this door, greg I can ignore due to his mental health issues but you have chosen to be on this path.

Hi there, Leroy.

Do prawns feel pain?

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 55943
Gender: male

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #154 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 7:05pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:26pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:23pm:

I think its a fair question sadroo, you have claimed on this board that I defended pedophiles.

It is, but I suspect you will try to weasle out of every example I give you, like your whole underage girl thing earlier.

I'm trying to lay the groundwork first, so we can agree on what defending is, and who the peadophile was.

Is it too much to ask?

Answer the question, slandering, hysterical 'good faith' worm. It isn't a complicated request, ffs.

Just show us the post by Leroy.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

lee Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 19813 Gender:	Re: Minnesota Fraud Reply #155 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 7:50pm Karnal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 6:25pm: Do prawns feel pain? I am sure you do.
Back to top	IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 100476

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #156 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 8:43pm

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 7:05pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:26pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:23pm:

I think its a fair question sadroo, you have claimed on this board that I defended pedophiles.

It is, but I suspect you will try to weasle out of every example I give you, like your whole underage girl thing earlier.

I'm trying to lay the groundwork first, so we can agree on what defending is, and who the peadophile was.

Is it too much to ask?

Answer the question, slandering, hysterical 'good faith' worm. It isn't a complicated request, ffs.

Just show us the post by Leroy.

Oh look, now the old boys asking questions. How cute.

Leroy?

What did you say about questions again, dear?

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 55943
Gender: male

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #157 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 8:50pm

Karnal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 8:43pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 7:05pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:26pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:23pm:

I think its a fair question sadroo, you have claimed on this board that I defended pedophiles.

It is, but I suspect you will try to weasle out of every example I give you, like your whole underage girl thing earlier.

I'm trying to lay the groundwork first, so we can agree on what defending is, and who the peadophile was.

Is it too much to ask?

Answer the question, slandering, hysterical 'good faith' worm. It isn't a complicated request, ffs.

Just show us the post by Leroy.

Oh look, now the old boys asking questions. How cute.

Leroy?

What did you say about questions again, dear?

It's a question to proud teapot, you grimacing paki arse sniffer. As you know but pretend otherwise.

There is absolutely no limit to your abject dishonesty. You, skunk pig gweggy and teapot.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 100476

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #158 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 9:03pm

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 8:50pm:

Karnal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 8:43pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 7:05pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:26pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:23pm:

I think its a fair question sadroo, you have claimed on this board that I defended pedophiles.

It is, but I suspect you will try to weasle out of every example I give you, like your whole underage girl thing earlier.

I'm trying to lay the groundwork first, so we can agree on what defending is, and who the peadophile was.

Is it too much to ask?

Answer the question, slandering, hysterical 'good faith' worm. It isn't a complicated request, ffs.

Just show us the post by Leroy.

Oh look, now the old boys asking questions. How cute.

Leroy?

What did you say about questions again, dear?

It's a question to proud teapot, you grimacing paki arse sniffer. As you know but pretend otherwise.

There is absolutely no limit to your abject dishonesty. You, skunk pig gweggy and teapot.

Mendacious, is it?

I see. Up for a question yourself, dear chap?

Would you like to signal a little - ahem - honesty?

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 55943
Gender: male

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #159 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 9:09pm

Karnal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 9:03pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 8:50pm:

Karnal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 8:43pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 7:05pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:26pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:23pm:

I think its a fair question sadroo, you have claimed on this board that I defended pedophiles.

It is, but I suspect you will try to weasle out of every example I give you, like your whole underage girl thing earlier.

I'm trying to lay the groundwork first, so we can agree on what defending is, and who the peadophile was.

Is it too much to ask?

Answer the question, slandering, hysterical 'good faith' worm. It isn't a complicated request, ffs.

Just show us the post by Leroy.

Oh look, now the old boys asking questions. How cute.

Leroy?

What did you say about questions again, dear?

It's a question to proud teapot, you grimacing paki arse sniffer. As you know but pretend otherwise.

There is absolutely no limit to your abject dishonesty. You, skunk pig gweggy and teapot.

Mendacious, is it?

I see. Up for a question yourself, dear chap?

Would you like to signal a little - ahem - honesty?

You have been told before, arse sniffer- that's enough idiotic grimacing.

Be told.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Karnal

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 100476

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #160 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 9:18pm

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 9:09pm:

Karnal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 9:03pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 8:50pm:

Karnal wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 8:43pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 7:05pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:26pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:23pm:

I think its a fair question sadroo, you have claimed on this board that I defended pedophiles.

It is, but I suspect you will try to weasle out of every example I give you, like your whole underage girl thing earlier.

I'm trying to lay the groundwork first, so we can agree on what defending is, and who the peadophile was.

Is it too much to ask?

Answer the question, slandering, hysterical 'good faith' worm. It isn't a complicated request, ffs.

Just show us the post by Leroy.

Oh look, now the old boys asking questions. How cute.

Leroy?

What did you say about questions again, dear?

It's a question to proud teapot, you grimacing paki arse sniffer. As you know but pretend otherwise.

There is absolutely no limit to your abject dishonesty. You, skunk pig gweggy and teapot.

Mendacious, is it?

I see. Up for a question yourself, dear chap?

Would you like to signal a little - ahem - honesty?

You have been told before, arse sniffer- that's enough idiotic grimacing.

Be told.

Right. So you won't take a question?

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 55943
Gender: male

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #161 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 9:32pm

MINNEAPOLIS, MN — Amid accusations connected to a massive fraud scandal, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz has announced he will not seek reelection.

Sources say the governor will now focus his attention on prison where it belongs.

"Yes, folks, I have decided to retire," said Walz, flanked by dozens of cheering Somali migrants. "I love being governor, but I need to spend more time on some other important priorities in my life. It has been an honor serving as your governor. Hadda waan tegayaa Dhamaantiin waxaan idin leeyahay sagootin aad u wanaagsan."

At publishing time, Walz had reportedly escaped the country and was headed to Somalia.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Karnal Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 100476	Re: Minnesota Fraud Reply #162 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 9:41pm I see. You're refusing questions. Why is that, dear boy? What, exactly, are you trying to hide?
Back to top	IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21683
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #163 - Jan 7^th, 2026 at 7:20am

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 7:05pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:26pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:23pm:

I think its a fair question sadroo, you have claimed on this board that I defended pedophiles.

It is, but I suspect you will try to weasle out of every example I give you, like your whole underage girl thing earlier.

I'm trying to lay the groundwork first, so we can agree on what defending is, and who the peadophile was.

Is it too much to ask?

Answer the question, slandering, hysterical 'good faith' worm. It isn't a complicated request, ffs.

Just show us the post by Leroy.

In good faith, before I start posting quotes and links, let's take one example, would you accept that Leroy's repeated attempts to derail a thread whose explicit focus is Epstein, a known and convicted paedophile for soliciting prostitution and soliciting prostitution of a minor, are a deliberate tactic to avoid the substance of the discussion, namely Trump's links to a convicted paedophile who has stated that Trump knew about the girls?

This is the same pattern we saw in the other thread. Trump himself admitted the falling out with Epstein was over Epstein "stealing" staff from Trump's spa, some of whom were underage, a point that directly contradicts the version of their falling out recently pushed by CNN.

The instant the word "underage" appeared, Leroy materialised to drag the discussion elsewhere, reframing it as some generic argument about underage girls rather than the actual question, who is lying here, Trump or CNN?

You don't see a problem with that behaviour?

Every time Trump is mentioned in proximity to the exploitation of children, Leroy rushes in to defend him through distraction, derailment, and in some cases outright minimisation of the victims. That kind of knee-jerk tribal defence, which downplays child abuse to protect someone on "his side", really doesn't trouble you at all?

Back to top

IP Logged

Leroy

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4488
Gender: male

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #164 - Jan 7^th, 2026 at 7:29am

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 7^th, 2026 at 7:20am:

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 7:05pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:26pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:23pm:

I think its a fair question sadroo, you have claimed on this board that I defended pedophiles.

It is, but I suspect you will try to weasle out of every example I give you, like your whole underage girl thing earlier.

I'm trying to lay the groundwork first, so we can agree on what defending is, and who the peadophile was.

Is it too much to ask?

Answer the question, slandering, hysterical 'good faith' worm. It isn't a complicated request, ffs.

Just show us the post by Leroy.

In good faith, before I start posting quotes and links, let's take one example, would you accept that Leroy's repeated attempts to derail a thread whose explicit focus is Epstein, a known and convicted paedophile for soliciting prostitution and soliciting prostitution of a minor, are a deliberate tactic to avoid the substance of the discussion, namely Trump's links to a convicted paedophile who has stated that Trump knew about the girls?

This is the same pattern we saw in the other thread. Trump himself admitted the falling out with Epstein was over Epstein "stealing" staff from Trump's spa, some of whom were underage, a point that directly contradicts the version of their falling out recently pushed by CNN.

The instant the word "underage" appeared, Leroy materialised to drag the discussion elsewhere, reframing it as some generic argument about underage girls rather than the actual question, who is lying here, Trump or CNN?

You don't see a problem with that behaviour?

Every time Trump is mentioned in proximity to the exploitation of children, Leroy rushes in to defend him through distraction, derailment, and in some cases outright minimisation of the victims. That kind of knee-jerk tribal defence, which downplays child abuse to protect someone on "his side", really doesn't trouble you at all?

Well all you have to do is provide the name of the pedophile I supported and where I supported child abuse.

Trump has not been accused of anything in the Epstein files and CNN have reported that several times, but you seem to think because you read a post by greg that makes Trump a pedophile.

So its time to put up or shut up sadroo, provide the evidence you have that proves trump is a pedophile and after that tell us why you are selectively ignoring the evidence about Bill Clinton and Larry Summers.

Its time to back up what you are saying sadroo.

Back to top

Trump derangement syndrome
Fareed Zakaria defined the term as "hatred of President Trump so intense that it impairs people's judgment"

Lets check in at 5pm on 23rd July 2025 then at 5pm on 30th July

IP Logged