Australian Politics Forum - Minnesota Fraud

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21898
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #135 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:16pm

Leroy wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:11pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:08pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 3:49pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 1:46pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 12:45pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 12:23pm:

All these Trump supporters suddenly pretend to care about fraud?

Hahahahahahaha...

What?? YOU don't??

Tampon Timmy conceded that his state on his watch became a hub of Somali fraud of stupendous proportions.

Why should anyone take you seriously when you selectively ignore fraud by the people you idolise, only caring when it can be pinned on an opponent?

Fraud is either wrong or it isn't. You can pretend otherwise, but a reasonable person wouldn't.

In the same way, the sexual exploitation of children is always unacceptable and unforgivable, and every level of law enforcement should come down on those who commit it.

Yet, when it comes to Trump or those close to him, you turn a blind eye. There is no amount of money stolen through fraud, no number of children abused, that is ever too much for you to excuse, so long as it is associated with him.

If the rule of law only applies when you want it to, then what is the point of it at all?

Once again you are talking overwrought, hyperbolic rot, teapot.

Am I?

You called the court that found Trump had defrauded his own charity, including stealing money raised for children with cancer, a politically motivated witch hunt.

You refuse to even state that if Trump were proven to have abused children, he should be impeached and face the full force of the law.

That makes your position clear. You do not care about right or wrong, or about legality versus criminality, so long as your side is winning.

In that context, engaging with you in good faith is pointless, because you are fundamentally incapable of it. You are not arguing from principle, evidence, or consistency, you are arguing from tribal loyalty.

Instead of responding to what is said, you default to insults, deflection, and selective deafness.

So spare me the crocodile tears. The perpetual victimhood routine does not work on me.

At this point, should I just start abusing you back, since it appears to be the only language you recognise?

But in all fairness you have TDS, don't believe me, then show you family the posts you make and see the response.

And that's the tell with you lot, your latest sign of surrender, just accusing someone that you can't respond to as haing TDS.

I do wonder what your family would make of you defending paedophiles and attempting to rationalise people performing Nazi salutes.

At least I can stand behind what I've written. There are a few moments I'm not proud of, where I sank to the level of the Franks and Barons and returned the same abuse they so freely dish out, but those are the exception, not the rule.

You, on the other hand, are actively choosing to defend the indefensible.

Are you genuinely proud of defending Nazis and paedophiles?

I would hope not, but these are strange times, and the moral contortions some people are willing to perform no longer surprise me.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 57081
Gender: male

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #136 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:28pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:16pm:

And that's the tell with you lot, your latest sign of surrender, just accusing someone that you can't respond to as haing TDS.

I do wonder what your family would make of you defending paedophiles and attempting to rationalise people performing Nazi salutes.

At least I can stand behind what I've written. There are a few moments I'm not proud of, where I sank to the level of the Franks and Barons and returned the same abuse they so freely dish out, but those are the exception, not the rule.

You, on the other hand, are actively choosing to defend the indefensible.

Are you genuinely proud of defending Nazis and paedophiles?

I would hope not, but these are strange times, and the moral contortions some people are willing to perform no longer surprise me.

Once again you are talking overwrought, hyperbolic rot, teapot. What nazis, what paedophile, breathless little hysteric??

What fraud, what child abuse, what nazism did Trump get away with - and I am not asking you about slanderous, despicable creepy gweggy's gossips and memes or your innuendos or those of the trouser sniffing son of Pakistan's idiotic grimacing.

Trump is scrutinised and has had relentless lawfare against him as well as an openly hostile media. They tried to assassinate him a couple of times. He came through and got re-elected.

If you want to see real cover up, look at Alboweasel's lies and obfuscation over the voice or now the RC.or Starmer's obfuscation and cover up of the racially and religiously motivated Muslim rape gangs in England.

Now that the Somali fraud on Tampon Timmy's watch ( Guv for 7 years and VP candidate, ffs) has come out, Timmy has decided that it's time not to preside over it for a third term. This fraud has been ignored and covered up by him and his officials until it couldn't be any longer. And so you immediately swing into action and like him - yammer about Trump.

Pathetic.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Leroy

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4629
Gender: male

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #137 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:30pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:16pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:11pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:08pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 3:49pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 1:46pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 12:45pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 12:23pm:

All these Trump supporters suddenly pretend to care about fraud?

Hahahahahahaha...

What?? YOU don't??

Tampon Timmy conceded that his state on his watch became a hub of Somali fraud of stupendous proportions.

Why should anyone take you seriously when you selectively ignore fraud by the people you idolise, only caring when it can be pinned on an opponent?

Fraud is either wrong or it isn't. You can pretend otherwise, but a reasonable person wouldn't.

In the same way, the sexual exploitation of children is always unacceptable and unforgivable, and every level of law enforcement should come down on those who commit it.

Yet, when it comes to Trump or those close to him, you turn a blind eye. There is no amount of money stolen through fraud, no number of children abused, that is ever too much for you to excuse, so long as it is associated with him.

If the rule of law only applies when you want it to, then what is the point of it at all?

Once again you are talking overwrought, hyperbolic rot, teapot.

Am I?

You called the court that found Trump had defrauded his own charity, including stealing money raised for children with cancer, a politically motivated witch hunt.

You refuse to even state that if Trump were proven to have abused children, he should be impeached and face the full force of the law.

That makes your position clear. You do not care about right or wrong, or about legality versus criminality, so long as your side is winning.

In that context, engaging with you in good faith is pointless, because you are fundamentally incapable of it. You are not arguing from principle, evidence, or consistency, you are arguing from tribal loyalty.

Instead of responding to what is said, you default to insults, deflection, and selective deafness.

So spare me the crocodile tears. The perpetual victimhood routine does not work on me.

At this point, should I just start abusing you back, since it appears to be the only language you recognise?

But in all fairness you have TDS, don't believe me, then show you family the posts you make and see the response.

And that's the tell with you lot, your latest sign of surrender, just accusing someone that you can't respond to as haing TDS.

I do wonder what your family would make of you defending paedophiles and attempting to rationalise people performing Nazi salutes.

At least I can stand behind what I've written. There are a few moments I'm not proud of, where I sank to the level of the Franks and Barons and returned the same abuse they so freely dish out, but those are the exception, not the rule.

You, on the other hand, are actively choosing to defend the indefensible.

Are you genuinely proud of defending Nazis and paedophiles?

I would hope not, but these are strange times, and the moral contortions some people are willing to perform no longer surprise me.

Which paedophile have I defended sadroo. See how you TDS makes it impossible to reason with you.

Back to top

Trump derangement syndrome
Fareed Zakaria defined the term as "hatred of President Trump so intense that it impairs people's judgment"

Lets check in at 5pm on 23rd July 2025 then at 5pm on 30th July

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21898
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #138 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:37pm

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:28pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:16pm:

And that's the tell with you lot, your latest sign of surrender, just accusing someone that you can't respond to as haing TDS.

I do wonder what your family would make of you defending paedophiles and attempting to rationalise people performing Nazi salutes.

At least I can stand behind what I've written. There are a few moments I'm not proud of, where I sank to the level of the Franks and Barons and returned the same abuse they so freely dish out, but those are the exception, not the rule.

You, on the other hand, are actively choosing to defend the indefensible.

Are you genuinely proud of defending Nazis and paedophiles?

I would hope not, but these are strange times, and the moral contortions some people are willing to perform no longer surprise me.

Once again you are talking overwrought, hyperbolic rot, teapot.

We can't start a good-faith discussion when you're being such a disrespectful dickhead.

Would you like to try again?

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 57081
Gender: male

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #139 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:39pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:37pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:28pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:16pm:

And that's the tell with you lot, your latest sign of surrender, just accusing someone that you can't respond to as haing TDS.

I do wonder what your family would make of you defending paedophiles and attempting to rationalise people performing Nazi salutes.

At least I can stand behind what I've written. There are a few moments I'm not proud of, where I sank to the level of the Franks and Barons and returned the same abuse they so freely dish out, but those are the exception, not the rule.

You, on the other hand, are actively choosing to defend the indefensible.

Are you genuinely proud of defending Nazis and paedophiles?

I would hope not, but these are strange times, and the moral contortions some people are willing to perform no longer surprise me.

Once again you are talking overwrought, hyperbolic rot, teapot.

We can't start a good-faith discussion when you're being such a disrespectful dickhead.

Would you like to try again?

You and good faith discussions are not even nodding acquaintances.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21898
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #140 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:43pm

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:39pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:37pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:28pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:16pm:

And that's the tell with you lot, your latest sign of surrender, just accusing someone that you can't respond to as haing TDS.

I do wonder what your family would make of you defending paedophiles and attempting to rationalise people performing Nazi salutes.

At least I can stand behind what I've written. There are a few moments I'm not proud of, where I sank to the level of the Franks and Barons and returned the same abuse they so freely dish out, but those are the exception, not the rule.

You, on the other hand, are actively choosing to defend the indefensible.

Are you genuinely proud of defending Nazis and paedophiles?

I would hope not, but these are strange times, and the moral contortions some people are willing to perform no longer surprise me.

Once again you are talking overwrought, hyperbolic rot, teapot.

We can't start a good-faith discussion when you're being such a disrespectful dickhead.

Would you like to try again?

You and good faith discussions are not even nodding acquaintances.

So you don't want to try again?

Then stop the tears if you choose not to even try.

Back to top

IP Logged

Leroy Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 4629 Gender:	Re: Minnesota Fraud Reply #141 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:45pm I'm still waiting for the name of the pedophile I defended sadroo.
Back to top	Trump derangement syndrome Fareed Zakaria defined the term as "hatred of President Trump so intense that it impairs people's judgment" Lets check in at 5pm on 23rd July 2025 then at 5pm on 30th July IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 57081
Gender: male

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #142 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:46pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:43pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:39pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:37pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:28pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:16pm:

And that's the tell with you lot, your latest sign of surrender, just accusing someone that you can't respond to as haing TDS.

I do wonder what your family would make of you defending paedophiles and attempting to rationalise people performing Nazi salutes.

At least I can stand behind what I've written. There are a few moments I'm not proud of, where I sank to the level of the Franks and Barons and returned the same abuse they so freely dish out, but those are the exception, not the rule.

You, on the other hand, are actively choosing to defend the indefensible.

Are you genuinely proud of defending Nazis and paedophiles?

I would hope not, but these are strange times, and the moral contortions some people are willing to perform no longer surprise me.

Once again you are talking overwrought, hyperbolic rot, teapot.

We can't start a good-faith discussion when you're being such a disrespectful dickhead.

Would you like to try again?

You and good faith discussions are not even nodding acquaintances.

So you don't want to try again?

Then stop the tears if you choose not to even try.

It's tears of laughter, little teapot.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21898
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #143 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:03pm

Leroy wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:45pm:

I'm still waiting for the name of the pedophile I defended sadroo.

Why is it whenever the topic of Trump and his links to Epstein, or Trump not releasing the files, or heavily redacting them, do you constantly try to change the subject to Biden, the democrats or Clinton?

What are you so afraid of, and who are you trying to protect?

Or are you trying to say you don't engage in that sort of deflection?

Back to top

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21898
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #144 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:07pm

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:46pm:

It's tears of laughter, little teapot.

Ok, let's try a reset then.

Let's start by finding some common ground, even if it's just agreeing on what we're actually talking about.

My entry to this thread was pointing out how funny it is that so many MAGA supporters ignored Trump's own instances of fraud and only seem to care now when they think it can be used against an opponent.

If you peel back the abusive comments and name-calling, your response has been trying to argue that Trump has not engaged in such behaviour.

Is that a fair summation of where we are, a place where we can begin a good-faith exchange?

Back to top

IP Logged

Leroy

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4629
Gender: male

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #145 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:09pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:03pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:45pm:

I'm still waiting for the name of the pedophile I defended sadroo.

Why is it whenever the topic of Trump and his links to Epstein, or Trump not releasing the files, or heavily redacting them, do you constantly try to change the subject to Biden, the democrats or Clinton?

What are you so afraid of, and who are you trying to protect?

Or are you trying to say you don't engage in that sort of deflection?

All I have asked you for is the name of the pedophile you claim I defend, you can show me the posts if you want. So just tell me who this pedophile you claim I defend.

Back to top

Trump derangement syndrome
Fareed Zakaria defined the term as "hatred of President Trump so intense that it impairs people's judgment"

Lets check in at 5pm on 23rd July 2025 then at 5pm on 30th July

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 57081
Gender: male

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #146 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:20pm

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:07pm:

Frank wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:46pm:

It's tears of laughter, little teapot.

Ok, let's try a reset then.

Let's start by finding some common ground, even if it's just agreeing on what we're actually talking about.

My entry to this thread was pointing out how funny it is that so many MAGA supporters ignored Trump's own instances of fraud and only seem to care now when they think it can be used against an opponent.

If you peel back the abusive comments and name-calling, your response has been trying to argue that Trump has not engaged in such behaviour.

Is that a fair summation of where we are, a place where we can begin a good-faith exchange?

There are hundreds of threads and thousandds of commentson Trump's crimes.

One thread on Minnesota Somali fraud. But even here you TDS mongs want to wank only about your Trump derangement.

Peel back that, teapot.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21898
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #147 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:20pm

Leroy wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:09pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:03pm:

Leroy wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 4:45pm:

I'm still waiting for the name of the pedophile I defended sadroo.

Why is it whenever the topic of Trump and his links to Epstein, or Trump not releasing the files, or heavily redacting them, do you constantly try to change the subject to Biden, the democrats or Clinton?

What are you so afraid of, and who are you trying to protect?

Or are you trying to say you don't engage in that sort of deflection?

All I have asked you for is the name of the pedophile you claim I defend, you can show me the posts if you want. So just tell me who this pedophile you claim I defend.

We're getting there.

Are you not able to confirm that you've acted this way in the various threads about Epstein?

Back to top

IP Logged

Leroy

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 4629
Gender: male

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #148 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:23pm

I think its a fair question sadroo, you have claimed on this board that I defended pedophiles.

I'm asking for the name of this pedophile, you posted this

Quote:

At least I can stand behind what I've written. There are a few moments I'm not proud of, where I sank to the level of the Franks and Barons

This time you have lowered yourself to gregs level.

Back to top

Trump derangement syndrome
Fareed Zakaria defined the term as "hatred of President Trump so intense that it impairs people's judgment"

Lets check in at 5pm on 23rd July 2025 then at 5pm on 30th July

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21898
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Minnesota Fraud
Reply #149 - Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:26pm

Leroy wrote on Jan 6^th, 2026 at 5:23pm:

I think its a fair question sadroo, you have claimed on this board that I defended pedophiles.

It is, but I suspect you will try to weasle out of every example I give you, like your whole underage girl thing earlier.

I'm trying to lay the groundwork first, so we can agree on what defending is, and who the peadophile was.

Is it too much to ask?

Back to top

IP Logged