It's the big 'what if' scenario.
Is the Anus PM of Australia refusing to protect Jewish Australians (Australians in general) from Islam's Terrorism against non Muslims (like in Africa, Phillipines, Kurds and more) much like the UN has failed to protect Israel from decades of attacks?
The result finally reaching from this one sided ineffective denial, seeing Israel forced to take action itself to protect itself.
Will we see Australians, like the Jews here, be forced into retaliation to protect themselves?
Will the Anus PM take stern action then against retaliation - punishing the good, because (like the UN) are afraid of the attackers (Islam) and a far 'too hard basket' in their cowardly view as so-called 'Boss' politically (UN/Anus)?
Is the excuse of wealth also a factor? "Oh, they're poorer, so they're the innocent ones!" Well that's voided by the richer being a minority too - bullied by a greater horde. A top v bottom equalibrium.
If there is retaliation? I'm pretty sure support for the minority will increase more than the Moslem greater number until they are the crying minority feeling the walls close in. Afterall, Australians have fought wars for others in its global MATESHIP against aggressors.
Or will there be NO RETALIATION with the Jews here being slaughtered by Moslems free to do what they like without reprimand directly by a cowardly Anus of a PM... LIKE THE MORI-ORI were by the MAORI immigrants once they got a sizeable number up? Luckily for the 60 left Mori-Ori, some brave Europeans stepped in and opposed the Maori to stop or else!
I think, with all this said. THE PROBLEM IS NOT ISLAM.
ITS THE FAULT OF THE INEFFECTIVE AND COWARDLY LEFT OF BOTH THE UN AND IN REGARDS TO HERE IN AUSTRALIA - IS THAT ANUS PM (and his weak Lefty G-G put in by him to void any challenge) AND THE ALP (& the corrupt mainstream Media).
If there is retaliation - he'll come down hard, like he didn't with the attackers (Islam) and now has someone to blame.
Retaliation or being continually attacked and killed due to a lack of unbiased protection?
What would you do if the police refused to protect your family against others who are making attempts to murder them and the Police will punish you and not the attackers?
Well they've already put in motion - no guns.
But hey, there's always drones and something just around the corner that's even better than them. No laws on new innovations right?
Survival of the fittest (if you play sports) as they say.
The world is changing and the Left might be just 'left behind' in their stance and bias.
Who knows? Maybe there is an Australian version of that Muad'dib of Dune fame... and with the latest game changer technology Australian style innovation? Making guns as obsolete as Arrows.
"But it's not a gun officer" No law broken there.
...and Australia gets rich too!

Yours faithfully,
You're DAY AHEAD, not 'Down Under' - Sahulian Australian.