Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Bondi terrorists gun license (Read 2210 times)
Baronvonrort
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20426
Gender: male
Bondi terrorists gun license
Dec 20th, 2025 at 12:40am
 
Quote:
Police delayed terrorist’s gun licence for years. Why was it issued?


More doubts are being raised about the legitimacy of terrorist Sajid Akram being issued a firearms licence after NSW police had delayed its approval for three years, then granted it within months of the Minns Government coming to power.

Confidential sources have told Sporting Shooter that Akram’s five-year licence number 411489664 was issued on 8/9/2023, less than six months after the Minns Government replaced the previous Coalition Government.

The licence application had been under consideration for roughly 2˝ years under the Coalition Government.

Akram had initially applied for a firearms licence in 2015 but did not follow through on it and the application lapsed in 2016.

He re-applied in 2020 but the NSW Firearms Registry, for reasons not yet known, did not immediately approve it, instead delaying for a period much longer than is typical for an application. This was just after his son, Naveed Akram, had been investigated by ASIO for links to extremists.

Even a delayed approval rarely takes more than a year in the state.

“The question is, if NSW Police had information in 2020 that caused them not to issue, what changed?” our source, who did not want to be named, said.

“Was change of government the only factor or was it something else?”

Akram’s licensed address was the same as is listed for his son who had been on a terrorist watch list.

Such an association is reason for not granting a firearms licence in NSW, or revoking an existing licence.


Questions have also been raised by former Defence deputy secretary Peter Jennings, who told Sky News, “There were not one or two, but several occasions when red flags should have been raised” about the terrorist’s licence.

People are wondering whether those flags were raised during that long period during which the licence application was pending, and if they were, why they were ignored.

https://sportingshooter.com.au/gun-law/police-delayed-terrorists-gun-licence-for...



Police refused Kyle Sandilands a firearm licence for having dodgy mates .

How did someone with a son who lived with him and was on an ASIO watchlist get a licence after the terrorism connection was known or suspected?

Kyles dodgy mates
John Ibrahim- convicted for assault when he was a teenager no convictions for anything since then
Simon Main- Barry Crockers stepson convicted drug smuggler did his time nothing since then.

Why did the Police give a license to this terrorist when his son lived in the same house and had friends who were convicted and jailed for terrorism?
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 55682
Gender: male
Re: Bondi terrorists gun license
Reply #1 - Dec 20th, 2025 at 6:36am
 
I want a gun.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 57123
Gender: male
Re: Bondi terrorists gun license
Reply #2 - Dec 20th, 2025 at 7:31am
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Dec 20th, 2025 at 12:40am:
Quote:
Police delayed terrorist’s gun licence for years. Why was it issued?


More doubts are being raised about the legitimacy of terrorist Sajid Akram being issued a firearms licence after NSW police had delayed its approval for three years, then granted it within months of the Minns Government coming to power.

Confidential sources have told Sporting Shooter that Akram’s five-year licence number 411489664 was issued on 8/9/2023, less than six months after the Minns Government replaced the previous Coalition Government.

The licence application had been under consideration for roughly 2˝ years under the Coalition Government.

Akram had initially applied for a firearms licence in 2015 but did not follow through on it and the application lapsed in 2016.

He re-applied in 2020 but the NSW Firearms Registry, for reasons not yet known, did not immediately approve it, instead delaying for a period much longer than is typical for an application. This was just after his son, Naveed Akram, had been investigated by ASIO for links to extremists.

Even a delayed approval rarely takes more than a year in the state.

“The question is, if NSW Police had information in 2020 that caused them not to issue, what changed?” our source, who did not want to be named, said.

“Was change of government the only factor or was it something else?”

Akram’s licensed address was the same as is listed for his son who had been on a terrorist watch list.

Such an association is reason for not granting a firearms licence in NSW, or revoking an existing licence.


Questions have also been raised by former Defence deputy secretary Peter Jennings, who told Sky News, “There were not one or two, but several occasions when red flags should have been raised” about the terrorist’s licence.

People are wondering whether those flags were raised during that long period during which the licence application was pending, and if they were, why they were ignored.

https://sportingshooter.com.au/gun-law/police-delayed-terrorists-gun-licence-for...



Police refused Kyle Sandilands a firearm licence for having dodgy mates .

How did someone with a son who lived with him and was on an ASIO watchlist get a licence after the terrorism connection was known or suspected?

Kyles dodgy mates
John Ibrahim- convicted for assault when he was a teenager no convictions for anything since then
Simon Main- Barry Crockers stepson convicted drug smuggler did his time nothing since then.

Why did the Police give a license to this terrorist when his son lived in the same house and had friends who were convicted and jailed for terrorism?


The police are inclusive.

Not giving him a license would have been wacism and islamophobia. Can't have that. Can you imagine what Farkyouqi would have said about such blatant islamophobic wacist discrimination?

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 55682
Gender: male
Re: Bondi terrorists gun license
Reply #3 - Dec 20th, 2025 at 10:23am
 
Can anyone post me a gun?
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 117717
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Bondi terrorists gun license
Reply #4 - Dec 20th, 2025 at 10:52am
 
Jasin wrote on Dec 20th, 2025 at 10:23am:
Can anyone post me a gun?



Bloody guns - I hate them.

I'd like to live in a world where not even the cops need guns.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 55682
Gender: male
Re: Bondi terrorists gun license
Reply #5 - Dec 20th, 2025 at 11:14am
 
Go back to spears?
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20426
Gender: male
Re: Bondi terrorists gun license
Reply #6 - Dec 20th, 2025 at 4:35pm
 
Quote:
As the sound of gunfire echoed across Bondi Beach, the frequency of the gunshots was terrifying. Both shooters were firing relentlessly, stopping only occasionally to reload their weapons.

In one piece of footage of the attack, Sajid Akram, the older of the two men, can be seen apparently firing his shotgun eight times without reloading.

And yet, Akram apparently owned the guns legally.

Speaking at the site of the shooting on Monday, former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull also expressed surprise.

"I read a report that there was a pump-action shotgun involved. I thought pump action shotguns were not available," Mr Turnbull told the media.



Pump-action shotguns operate using a slide mechanism that is pulled up and down the barrel between rounds to eject the empty cartridge and load a new shell into the firing chamber. Not only is it more reliable and efficient, you don't need to take your hand off the trigger between rounds to pull the lever action

In the 1990s, pump-action guns were so dominant that when a list of buyback values of newly banned guns was published by the New South Wales government in 1996, there were no lever-action shotguns explicitly listed.

Guns available to Category C licence holders would be limited by their capacity — the number of rounds they could fire before reloading. Pump-action shotguns with a capacity of up to 5 rounds would sit in this category.

So, the logical question is — if pump action shotguns with more than a five-shot capacity were in the most restricted category, how was Sajid Akram able to legally own the gun he was using to slaughter innocent people in Bondi on December 14?


https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/how-the-bondi-shooters-got-access-to-no...



Police said shotgun was Remington 870 in one of Police reports last Sunday it's pump action.

Police source also suggest Ahmed "the moderate" muslim might not have known how to cycle it to load another round which is why he may not have shot the Islamic terrorist with his own gun.

You can see the older terrorist cycling the pump action after he shot the first 2 victims Boris Gurman and his wife.

The Police and Labor Politicians are saying he legally owned 6 guns they leave out the part where the Remington 870 he used was outlawed in 1996 it's Category D only available to Professional shooters paid to shoot feral pests.

There is a lot of other contradictory nonsense from that journalist who doesn't know about guns.

Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20426
Gender: male
Re: Bondi terrorists gun license
Reply #7 - Dec 20th, 2025 at 5:02pm
 
Middle Eastern males using AK47 to shoot up a house in Sydney.

They posted video of this on social media before getting caught.

Semi auto AK47 were banned in 1996 full auto version was never legal here.

Does anyone believe Labors new gun laws will stop middle eastern gangs from shooting up Sydney?



Would it be asking too much from labor to actually create laws that target illegal gun ownership?
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 55682
Gender: male
Re: Bondi terrorists gun license
Reply #8 - Dec 20th, 2025 at 7:24pm
 
If Indonesian fishermen have plenty of time to clean their fish on Australian shores. You never know what they leave behind besides scale and bone.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20426
Gender: male
Re: Bondi terrorists gun license
Reply #9 - Dec 20th, 2025 at 7:30pm
 
Jasin wrote on Dec 20th, 2025 at 7:24pm:
If Indonesian fishermen have plenty of time to clean their fish on Australian shores. You never know what they leave behind besides scale and bone.


Container loads of illegal cigarettes are flooding into this country.

What else is in those containers?
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20426
Gender: male
Re: Bondi terrorists gun license
Reply #10 - Dec 20th, 2025 at 11:30pm
 
Baronvonrort wrote on Dec 20th, 2025 at 4:35pm:
Quote:
As the sound of gunfire echoed across Bondi Beach, the frequency of the gunshots was terrifying. Both shooters were firing relentlessly, stopping only occasionally to reload their weapons.

In one piece of footage of the attack, Sajid Akram, the older of the two men, can be seen apparently firing his shotgun eight times without reloading.

And yet, Akram apparently owned the guns legally.

Speaking at the site of the shooting on Monday, former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull also expressed surprise.

"I read a report that there was a pump-action shotgun involved. I thought pump action shotguns were not available," Mr Turnbull told the media.



Pump-action shotguns operate using a slide mechanism that is pulled up and down the barrel between rounds to eject the empty cartridge and load a new shell into the firing chamber. Not only is it more reliable and efficient, you don't need to take your hand off the trigger between rounds to pull the lever action

In the 1990s, pump-action guns were so dominant that when a list of buyback values of newly banned guns was published by the New South Wales government in 1996, there were no lever-action shotguns explicitly listed.

Guns available to Category C licence holders would be limited by their capacity — the number of rounds they could fire before reloading. Pump-action shotguns with a capacity of up to 5 rounds would sit in this category.

So, the logical question is — if pump action shotguns with more than a five-shot capacity were in the most restricted category, how was Sajid Akram able to legally own the gun he was using to slaughter innocent people in Bondi on December 14?


https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/how-the-bondi-shooters-got-access-to-no...




Former PM Turnbull had a Category C firearm license he owned a farm for Primary Production.

Turnbull was allowed to have a pump action or semi auto shotgun limited to 5 rounds.

Turnbull admitted previously he owned a firearm and left it on his farm which is a requirement for Category C license for Primary Production

Did our Politicians tell NSW Police to only mention the 6 legally owned guns and not mention the illegal Category D shotgun the older terrorist used?

If police do a random inspection and find you have an illegal gun they take all your guns and revoke your license.
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20426
Gender: male
Re: Bondi terrorists gun license
Reply #11 - Dec 22nd, 2025 at 7:32pm
 
Quote:
7NEWS Sydney

@7NewsSydney

Sajid Akram, the 50-year-old Bondi Beach terrorist, was homeless and moving between Airbnbs across Sydney's southwest for six months before his attack. Even in death, his estranged wife wants nothing to do with him, putting burial plans in limbo.

https://x.com/7NewsSydney/status/2002659755500974542



He didn't inform NSW Firearms registry every time he moved his firearms for safe storage requirements while homeless and moving between airbnbs

Police said they recovered 2 guns from his last airbnb at Campsie there was no gun safe.

6 months of safe storage violations with his firearms before Bondi.

Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Baronvonrort
Moderator
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 20426
Gender: male
Re: Bondi terrorists gun license
Reply #12 - Dec 23rd, 2025 at 5:52pm
 
Quote:
‘Shambles’: Why it took years for Sajid Akram to obtain a gun licence


Slain Bondi gunman Sajid Akram’s long delays in obtaining a NSW gun licence were because the system was “a shambles” and based on paper records and did not involve any red flags being raised, according to NSW government insiders.

Mystery has surrounded why it took so long for the 50-year-old to secure a gun licence and why he didn’t raise red flags given the fact his son had been assessed by ASIO just a few years earlier.

NSW Police Commissioner Mal Lanyon confirmed last week that he first applied for a 2015 licence, but his application lapsed when he failed to provide a photograph.

“A second category A/B licence was applied for Mr Akram in 2020. That licence was recommended for issue and issued in 2023.”

When he reapplied in 2020 and was granted the licence in 2023 — it was four years after his son, Naveed Akram, 24, first came to the attention of ASIO. ASIO did not regard him as an ongoing threat at that time.

At the time, there was no link up with the NSW gun licensing body and families of people who had come to the attention of ASIO.

Instead, officials claim that until just a few years ago most of the records at the gun licence body were paper based and the system was “a shambles” until it was digitised.

This appears to have coincided around the same time that Sajid secured his licence.

Sajid legally owned six rifles and shotguns. He had category AB firearm licence, and was legally in possession of six guns, according to the NSW Police Commissioner.
( they never mention the illegal Rem 870 pump action wonder why?)

Independent NSW MP Phil Donato, a former police prosecutor and licensed firearms holder, has raised questions about the long waiting period Sajid faced for his gun licence.

“I’ve never in my experience heard of someone waiting three years for an approval to be granted by the firearms registry,” he told The Australian on Monday.

“It begs the question — what was the reason for the delay? I don’t accept it was a backlog of applications or being understaffed at the registry.”


Whether it was a delay because the registry was “a shambles” or not, gun purchases made by Sajid in September 2023 should have caught the attention of authorities.

Red flag over three identical guns
Under the national firearm agreement, the purchase of several identical guns should have triggered an investigation.


Police allege the bulky items loaded into their vehicle included two single barrel shotguns, a Beretta rifle, four homemade improvised explosive devices — three pipe bombs, one tennis ball bomb, one large IED bomb — and two Islamic State flags.

“The Accused and (Sajid Akram) used three firearms in their possession to shoot at a large number of people gathered for a Jewish event named ‘Chanukah by the Sea 2025,” the police facts allege.

“Together, the Accused and his father shot and killed 15 people. A further 40 victims were wounded by their gunfire, including two responding NSW Police officers who attended the scene.

Family home, Airbnb searched
After the Bondi attack, police searched the family home in Bonnyrigg,allegedly finding a homemade firearm
When police searched the Campsie Airbnb premises they allegedly found a rifle, a shotgun and bomb-making equipment.


https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/courts-law/shambles-why-it-took-years-f...



For some reason his license was delayed for 3 years which is unheard of nobody waits that long for approval.

Background checks are mandatory it's absurd to claim police from firearms registry aren't contacting ASIO with background checks.
A reasonable person would expect Police to contact ASIO with every background check for firearms license application and for ASIO to mention someone in the same house has friends in ISIS jailed for terrorist offences

When you apply for a Permit To Acquire for firearm purchase the police will query why you need another of that type and calibre. It's unheard of for them to approve 2 identical rifles or shotguns for hunters.
Why did they approve 2 identical Browning X Bolt Straight pull rifles in .308?
Why did they approve 2 identical Stoeger shotguns?
The Police have to approve every purchase before issuing a PTA.

When they raided his house they found an illegal home made gun. If they find any illegal or unregistered guns with safe storage inspections they leave with all of your guns.

If the Firearms registry is a shambles as the government claims it might explain why they gave him a license.
There were numerous things he should have been flagged on they failed big time.
Back to top
 

Leftists and the Ayatollahs have a lot in common when it comes to criticism of Islam, they don't tolerate it.
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 55682
Gender: male
Re: Bondi terrorists gun license
Reply #13 - Dec 23rd, 2025 at 6:48pm
 
Its good to see gun rules cleaning up loose ends.
But this shouldn't be used as the only remedy for Anus Albo to hide behind.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Online


Australian Politics

Posts: 57123
Gender: male
Re: Bondi terrorists gun license
Reply #14 - Dec 24th, 2025 at 8:01am
 
Can this government credibly claim it did not see this coming? That it required the largest loss of Jewish life since October 7, 2023, to acknowledge rising anti-Semitism and the threat of radical Islamist extremism? Australians are patient, but that patience is wearing thin as law-abiding citizens face consequences while the real dangers remain unaddressed.

What happened at Bondi Beach should never have occurred. Yet, once again, it appears state and federal policy is shifting the burden on to law-abiding citizens rather than addressing the actions of criminals and terrorists – individuals already known to security and law enforcement agencies.

Meanwhile, shootings continue almost nightly in major cities. How many incidents involve licensed firearm owners using licensed firearms? The number is, by any reasonable assessment, close to zero. Where is the leadership, honest discussion and action needed to confront illegal firearms in the hands of criminal groups?



A serious question now arises as to whether state and federal governments have misled the Australian public by selectively shaping communications about anti-Semitism and radical Islam for political purposes.

At the centre of this tragedy is the rise of radical Islamist extremism and violent anti-Semitism. Individuals who entered Australia, adopted or already held extremist ideologies and were known to national security agencies were nevertheless able to obtain a firearms licence and purchase weapons while not being citizens and while being monitored. Despite these red flags, they still were able to carry out a horrific attack on innocent Jewish Australians celebrating a religious festival. That is the core issue: the failure to recognise, confront and act decisively against escalating extremist ideology and anti-Semitism.

And the proposed response? Change the gun laws. Punish responsible, law-abiding Australians. This defies logic. It is the policy equivalent of confiscating the knives from the local butcher because someone was stabbed in the next town.

There isn’t a licensed firearms holder in the country who would be comfortable knowing that individuals with extremist ideology were able to obtain a firearms licence and purchase weapons. Reviewing the regulations and protocols governing the issuing of licences is reasonable. What is not reasonable is the reaction driven by optics rather than evidence by governments to push through legislation without consultation with affected citizens or any stakeholder groups.

The number of licensed firearms in Australia is dubious. Data inconsistencies between police systems and firearms registries are common – a firearm still may appear on a licence in one system even though it has been disposed of and is no longer registered in another. A single firearm may be recorded several times because of serial numbers being treated as separate entries. To support any meaningful policy or regulatory discussion, we need accurate firearm data.

This issue is not about gun control. It is about leadership, anti-Semitism and confronting radical Islamist extremism – about successive governments and agencies avoiding hard truths, prioritising political optics over national security and failing to properly resource the systems designed to protect Australians

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/wilful-blindness-dont-swallow-the-po...
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print