Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Why does Australia protect 'race fakes'? (Read 250 times)
MattE
Senior Member
****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 393
Gender: male
Why does Australia protect 'race fakes'?
Dec 11th, 2025 at 1:40pm
 
It is clear as day that Bruce Pascoe is a fake.

Genealogists have done his family tree and have found no Aboriginal ancestry. He isn't the only one. There is a federal Labor MP who when pressed has no answer. It was just what he was "told".

In the case of Bruce Pascoe, too many elite people, especially at the University of Melbourne, would have egg on their face of they had to admit they got it wrong. But they did, the family history has been conducted.

Love the video below where Bruce Pascoe was confronted on SBS Insight about his claims!



Bolt: Why does Australia protect race fakes like Bruce Pascoe?


Canada has cancelled celebrated “Cherokee” author Thomas King after exposing him as a racial fraud, while Australia continues protecting Bruce Pascoe despite similar allegations. Why do our cultural elites have such little respect for the truth?

By Andrew Bolt
4 December 2025

[...]



Take Bruce Pascoe, author of the bestseller Dark Emu.

Pascoe first publicly claimed he was Aboriginal some time after a Canberra Times reviewer in 1988 said his novel Fox, imagining an Aboriginal hero, would have been better had Pascoe been Aboriginal, too.

Soon he was, to immense success. Pascoe won a NSW Premier’s award for best Indigenous author. He was fawned over by writers’ festivals and our ABC, which also promoted him in videos for children.

His Dark Emu was even taught in schools, despite citing bogus sources to claim hunter-gathering Aboriginals were actually farmers. Melbourne University even bought into this nonsense by hiring Pascoe as its Enterprise Professor of Indigenous Agriculture. Governments gave him grants to grow Aboriginal crops.

Yet for years I’ve shown that Pascoe is a fake Aboriginal spruiking fake history.

He kept changing his story about his supposed Aboriginal ancestors – first, they were on his mother’s side, then on his father’s – and to this day refuses to give any proof.

Professional genealogists from the darkemuexposed.org website have since confirmed his ancestry is 100 per cent British, and Pascoe even admitted on SBS that “many” of his own family didn’t accept they were Aboriginals.

So why do so many institutions still cover for him?

The ABC still promotes Pascoe as a Yuin, Bunurong and Tasmanian Aboriginal man, as did Books & Publishing, the biggest journal in our publishing industry, just this week. The Nine newspapers also don’t admit he’s just a white guy, and nor does Melbourne University.

This refusal to confront race fakes is typical in Australia, unlike Canada.

I’ve publicly identified two Labor politicians and seven prominent academics who claim to be Aboriginal, but have no Aboriginal ancestors in their genealogy, as confirmed by darkemuexposed.org’s genealogists. None would prove to us they were Aboriginal, yet none were publicly disowned by their party or their university.

No NSW premier has even demanded Pascoe return his premier’s prize for best Aboriginal writer.

Why do our cultural elites have such little respect for the truth? Shouldn’t Canada’s example shame them?

FULL STORY: https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/opinion/bolt-why-does-australia-protect-race-f...
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Eoin O Fada
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3253
New England, NSW
Gender: male
Re: Why does Australia protect 'race fakes'?
Reply #1 - Dec 11th, 2025 at 2:09pm
 
Pascoe revisited, again and again and always shown to be a fake.
If he were not then one would expect him to produce the family’s birth and marriage certificates and show once and for all that the Victorian Births Deaths and Marriages website is wrong and is showing fake entries in its records.

Until then we must accept the BD and M records as valid and Pascoe as a fake.
Back to top
 

Self defence is a right.
 
IP Logged
 
Bobby.
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 115002
Melbourne
Gender: male
Re: Why does Australia protect 'race fakes'?
Reply #2 - Dec 11th, 2025 at 2:11pm
 

Quote:
It is clear as day that Bruce Pascoe is a fake.



Probably just another Whitie cashing in on Abboism.      Roll Eyes

Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Eoin O Fada
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3253
New England, NSW
Gender: male
Re: Why does Australia protect 'race fakes'?
Reply #3 - Dec 11th, 2025 at 2:45pm
 
Bruce Pascoe. Born 11 October, 1947, Richmond
Victoria.
Ancestors on his father’s side of the family, and
where they were born.
FATHER
Alfred Francis Pascoe 1916 – 1989. Victoria
GRANDPARENTS
Joseph Harold Pascoe 1891 – 1933. Victoria
Claudina Alice Palmer 1883 – 1967. Victoria
GREAT-GRANDPARENTS
Francis Pascoe 1859 – 1935. Victoria
Elizabeth Jane Hall 1868 – 1952. Victoria
Alfred William Palmer 1870 – 1938. Tasmania
Rebecca Arnold 1870 – 1944. Tasmania
GREAT-GREAT-GRANDPARENTS
Francis Pascoe 1814 – 1864. Cornwall, England
Jane Hampton 1827 – 1875. Cornwall, England
John Hall 1832 – 1881. Northumberland, England
Elizabeth Law b. abt. 1841 Durham, England
Thomas Edward Palmer 1830 – 1906. Devon,
England
*Alice Berry 1837 – 1861. Tasmania
William Arnold 1834 – 1914. Dorset, England
*Emily Maria Berry 1846 – 1919 Tasmania
GREAT-GREAT-GREAT-GRANDPARENTS
Joseph Berry 1811 – 1880. Lancashire, England
Sarah Wright 1819 – 1875. Suffolk, England
*Alice Berry and Emily Maria Berry are sisters – hence
the same parents.
Ancestors on his mother’s side of the family, and
where they were born.
MOTHER
Una Gloria Cowland Smith 1919 – 2004. Victoria
GRANDPARENTS
John Smith 1864 – 1952. Leicestershire, England
Cecil Gertrude Cowland 1875 – 1963. Victoria
GREAT-GRANDPARENTS
William Unwin Cowland 1824 – 1900. Essex, England
Sarah Matthews 1847 – 1879. Staffordshire, England
Reference :
https://australianhistory972829073.wordpress.c

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5cf30ff26df8f90001ae648d/t/5ded30f4570415...
Back to top
 

Self defence is a right.
 
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 54722
Gender: male
Re: Why does Australia protect 'race fakes'?
Reply #4 - Dec 11th, 2025 at 3:46pm
 
There is preferment, advantage, in being a fake Abo.

That is why they number jumped 25% from one census to the next.
Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Eoin O Fada
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3253
New England, NSW
Gender: male
Re: Why does Australia protect 'race fakes'?
Reply #5 - Dec 11th, 2025 at 5:02pm
 
One also wonders why the authors of Dark Emu Exposed are not having the experience of being dragged through the Courts for defamation
for their many claims that people have lied and obtained grant money reserved for Aboriginal people by claiming to be Aboriginal.
Thus, incidentally, denying recognition to those who otherwise would have been legitimate recipients.

Pascoe, for one, would have a bonanza, millions of dollars in damages and the satisfaction of proving the truth and watching his accusers brought to their knees, if not in whining supplication, at least in bankruptcy.
Back to top
 

Self defence is a right.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 45361
Re: Why does Australia protect 'race fakes'?
Reply #6 - Dec 11th, 2025 at 5:37pm
 
I'd be careful of anything that Holt claims.  He has been proved a liar in the past.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Dnarever
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 60890
Here
Gender: male
Re: Why does Australia protect 'race fakes'?
Reply #7 - Dec 11th, 2025 at 5:58pm
 
You guys find some special topics to wet your pants over.
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Eoin O Fada
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3253
New England, NSW
Gender: male
Re: Why does Australia protect 'race fakes'?
Reply #8 - Dec 11th, 2025 at 6:05pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 5:37pm:
I'd be careful of anything that Holt claims.  He has been proved a liar in the past.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Well, show us where he and the ‘’Revisited’’ blokes are wrong.
Are they out and out slanderous liars?
If so, don’t you think that they should be prosecuted?
Bolt may massage the truth but he has never claimed, nor inferred, that the Australian Light Horse at Beersheba did their famous charge with extra long bayonets as you have done, thus proving yourself a liar.
Back to top
 

Self defence is a right.
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 45361
Re: Why does Australia protect 'race fakes'?
Reply #9 - Dec 11th, 2025 at 8:29pm
 
Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 6:05pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 5:37pm:
I'd be careful of anything that Holt claims.  He has been proved a liar in the past.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Well, show us where he and the ‘’Revisited’’ blokes are wrong.
Are they out and out slanderous liars?
If so, don’t you think that they should be prosecuted?


He has been shown to be a liar on several occasions. He has lied over the Stolen Generation, over Greta Thurnberg and over the publication of a letter supposedly denouncing Bruce Pascoe.  The man is a worm not worth bothering about.  He couldn't lie straight in bed.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Frank
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 54722
Gender: male
Re: Why does Australia protect 'race fakes'?
Reply #10 - Dec 11th, 2025 at 8:47pm
 
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 8:29pm:
Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 6:05pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 5:37pm:
I'd be careful of anything that Holt claims.  He has been proved a liar in the past.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Well, show us where he and the ‘’Revisited’’ blokes are wrong.
Are they out and out slanderous liars?
If so, don’t you think that they should be prosecuted?


He has been shown to be a liar on several occasions. He has lied over the Stolen Generation, over Greta Thurnberg and over the publication of a letter supposedly denouncing Bruce Pascoe.  The man is a worm not worth bothering about.  He couldn't lie straight in bed.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Nonsense, cockwomble.

Bolt is right about Pascoe and all the fake abos. And he is not alone.  Almost all the abo industry is fake. You are fake, cockwomble. You are a fake Doctor of Divinity. Yet you yammer about ABC headlines about fake abos every day. Never a take, only the headline. You are a fake as fake can be. Inarticulate vanity and self-righteous idiocy = Bbwiyawn.

Back to top
 

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.
 
IP Logged
 
greggerypeccary
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 148112
Gender: male
Re: Why does Australia protect 'race fakes'?
Reply #11 - Dec 11th, 2025 at 9:02pm
 
Frank wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 8:47pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 8:29pm:
Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 6:05pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 5:37pm:
I'd be careful of anything that Holt claims.  He has been proved a liar in the past.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Well, show us where he and the ‘’Revisited’’ blokes are wrong.
Are they out and out slanderous liars?
If so, don’t you think that they should be prosecuted?


He has been shown to be a liar on several occasions. He has lied over the Stolen Generation, over Greta Thurnberg and over the publication of a letter supposedly denouncing Bruce Pascoe.  The man is a worm not worth bothering about.  He couldn't lie straight in bed.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Nonsense, cockwomble.

Bolt is right ...



Grin
Back to top
 
 
IP Logged
 
Brian Ross
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Representative of me

Posts: 45361
Re: Why does Australia protect 'race fakes'?
Reply #12 - Dec 11th, 2025 at 9:46pm
 
Frank wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 8:47pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 8:29pm:
Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 6:05pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 5:37pm:
I'd be careful of anything that Holt claims.  He has been proved a liar in the past.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Well, show us where he and the ‘’Revisited’’ blokes are wrong.
Are they out and out slanderous liars?
If so, don’t you think that they should be prosecuted?


He has been shown to be a liar on several occasions. He has lied over the Stolen Generation, over Greta Thurnberg and over the publication of a letter supposedly denouncing Bruce Pascoe.  The man is a worm not worth bothering about.  He couldn't lie straight in bed.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Nonsense, cockwomble.

Bolt is right about Pascoe and all the fake abos.

Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Back to top
 

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk...   Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 54201
Gender: male
Re: Why does Australia protect 'race fakes'?
Reply #13 - Yesterday at 5:13am
 
Australia DOESN'T protect race fakes. Just look on the Internet.

The MEDIA DOES protect race fakes. Just look on the Television.
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Sir Eoin O Fada
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 3253
New England, NSW
Gender: male
Re: Why does Australia protect 'race fakes'?
Reply #14 - Yesterday at 9:59am
 
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 8:29pm:
Sir Eoin O Fada wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 6:05pm:
Brian Ross wrote on Dec 11th, 2025 at 5:37pm:
I'd be careful of anything that Holt claims.  He has been proved a liar in the past.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

Well, show us where he and the ‘’Revisited’’ blokes are wrong.
Are they out and out slanderous liars?
If so, don’t you think that they should be prosecuted?


He has been shown to be a liar on several occasions. He has lied over the Stolen Generation, over Greta Thurnberg and over the publication of a letter supposedly denouncing Bruce Pascoe.  The man is a worm not worth bothering about.  He couldn't lie straight in bed.  Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes Roll Eyes

All very well, but show us where he lied, give a reference so that we may all be enlightened, you might, at the same time, give a reference to your alleged extra long bayonets that you claim were issued to the Light Horse.
Otherwise people may think that you are lying.
Back to top
 

Self defence is a right.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print