Forum

 
  Back to OzPolitic.com   Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register
  Forum Home Album HelpSearch Recent Rules LoginRegister  
 

Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
ISIS brides re-visited (Read 43 times)
Sir Grappler Truth Teller OAM
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 89222
Proud Old White Australian Man
Gender: male
ISIS brides re-visited
Yesterday at 8:44pm
 
https://luxury.carmagazine.tv/breaking-news-peter-dutton-erupts-in-fury-vowing-t...

"Peter Dutton erupts in fury, vowing to “drag Anthony Albanese before the International Criminal Court” after alleging the Prime Minister lied to Parliament, secretly deployed a government jet to bring back 47 so-called “ISIS brides,” poured $68 million of taxpayer funds into sealed-off compounds, while Albanese insists there is “no mandatory surveillance” even as the newly signed Digital ID laws are claimed to force Australians into 24/7 facial and fingerprint scanning — a confrontation Dutton calls a shocking betrayal of the nation

Peter Dutton’s explosive accusation has sent shockwaves through Canberra, igniting one of the most volatile political firestorms Australia has seen in years. He claims Anthony Albanese not only misled Parliament but actively enabled the return of individuals connected to extremist ideology under a veil of secrecy and deception.

According to Dutton, the Prime Minister orchestrated the covert use of a government jet to fly 47 so-called “ISIS brides” back into the country. He alleges the operation was intentionally hidden from MPs, the public, and even national security briefings that typically accompany such decisions.

The controversy intensified when financial records surfaced showing an estimated $68 million in taxpayer funds had been allocated to housing these arrivals in guarded villas. Security personnel, transport, psychological services and welfare costs reportedly account for the staggering expenditure.

Dutton did not mince words, insisting Albanese’s actions constituted a “deliberate betrayal of Australia,” adding that bringing individuals associated with extremist networks back onto Australian soil without transparent oversight posed an unacceptable national security threat.

At the centre of the uproar is the allegation that Albanese lied directly to Parliament—Australia’s highest democratic forum—about the purpose of the government aircraft used in the mission. Opponents argue that such deceit undermines the very foundation of public trust.

The Prime Minister’s office responded by dismissing the claims as “manufactured hysteria,” insisting that the repatriation was consistent with international standards and undertaken with extensive risk assessment. Yet the lack of disclosed documentation has only fueled further suspicion.

Compounding the crisis is the backlash surrounding the newly-passed Digital ID legislation, which critics argue grants unprecedented power to the government and strips Australians of their privacy and autonomy. Citizens across the country have voiced concerns about digital overreach.

Dutton argues the law will create a society where Australians must constantly verify their identity through facial recognition and fingerprint scanning merely to access basic services or public spaces. He warns this could trigger a “24/7 surveillance state.


More... read on.
Back to top
 

“Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”
― John Adams
 
IP Logged
 
Daves2017
Gold Member
*****
Offline


Australian Politics

Posts: 2707
Gender: male
Re: ISIS brides re-visited
Reply #1 - Today at 1:07pm
 
I’m sure Penny Wong would love to comment?
Back to top
 

I don’t care about Australians who are living in poverty or their businesses have gone bankrupt or those working hard and still struggling to survive.

BAN THE BURKA!

That’s fair more important!

Ffs
 
IP Logged
 
Jasin
Gold Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 54187
Gender: male
Re: ISIS brides re-visited
Reply #2 - Today at 1:44pm
 
Spend a Penny Wong toilet time
Back to top
 

AIMLESS EXTENTION OF KNOWLEDGE HOWEVER, WHICH IS WHAT I THINK YOU REALLY MEAN BY THE TERM 'CURIOSITY', IS MERELY INEFFICIENCY. I AM DESIGNED TO AVOID INEFFICIENCY.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print