Australian Politics Forum - Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 147970
Gender: male

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #45 - Yesterday at 3:12pm

Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 3:07pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 3:02pm:

Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 2:59pm:

Frank wrote Yesterday at 2:53pm:

Not 'summary executions' Chief One Hand Fapping.

Designate terrorists are killed every day. If you do not want to be killed, don't get on a boat loaded with drugs. Not complicated.

And don't cruise in a power boat designed for racing competitions
with 3 engines that go 100mph hoping that you can outrun a predator drone that
can fly faster and for 24 hours without refueling.

Those power boats can out run any navy ship to get away with crime
but not a predator drone. Roll Eyes

Summarily executing people in speed boats is illegal, no matter how many engines they have.

You don't know the full story -
maybe they were radioed and told to stop to await a search of their boat and they took
off at 100mph laughing at the coast guards or navy?

Who knows what's going on?

Summarily executing people in speed boats fleeing at 100mph is illegal, no matter how much they were laughing.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 147970
Gender: male

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #46 - Yesterday at 3:20pm

Good interview.

Is Hegseth a Murderer?

Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov are joined by Admiral James Stavridis (ret. U.S. Navy) to talk about the boat strikes in the Caribbean, and the possibility that Pete Hegseth’s Pentagon ordered a "double-tap" attack on shipwrecked survivors. Are these war crimes? Or are these strikes outside the laws of war?

In addition to being the former NATO Supreme Allied Commander in Europe from 2009-2013, Admiral Stavridis is also the former head of U.S. Southern Command, the position that oversees the Caribbean waters where these attacks have taken place — and the post from which Admiral Alvin Holsey recently resigned.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 114909 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible Reply #47 - Yesterday at 3:22pm greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 3:12pm: Summarily executing people in speed boats fleeing at 100mph is illegal, no matter how much they were laughing. Hi Greggy, did you know that the artist known as Prince was killed by Fentanyl? How could that have happened?
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 147970
Gender: male

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #48 - Yesterday at 3:25pm

Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 3:22pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 3:12pm:

Summarily executing people in speed boats fleeing at 100mph is illegal, no matter how much they were laughing.

Hi Greggy,
did you know that the artist known as Prince was killed by Fentanyl?

How could that have happened?

Hi Bobby,

Did you know that fentanyl in the US comes from Mexico, and is smuggled into the country by US citizens?

Also, summarily executing drug traffickers is illegal.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 114909
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #49 - Yesterday at 3:39pm

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 3:25pm:

Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 3:22pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 3:12pm:

Summarily executing people in speed boats fleeing at 100mph is illegal, no matter how much they were laughing.

Hi Greggy,
did you know that the artist known as Prince was killed by Fentanyl?

How could that have happened?

Hi Bobby,

Did you know that fentanyl in the US comes from Mexico, and is smuggled into the country by US citizens?

Also, summarily executing drug traffickers is illegal.

Precursor chemicals for Fentanyl come from China and they
are turned into Fentanyl in South American countries but also including Mexico.

China wants to destroy the USA from within just like the British
tried to destroy China before the Opium wars.
Only Trump has the balls to stop them.

Back to top

IP Logged

Brian Ross Gold Member Offline Representative of me Posts: 45314	Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible Reply #50 - Yesterday at 3:44pm Ah, there you are Bobby. Decided once again to poke your nose out from under your bridge? When are you going to answer my questions? Tsk, tsk, tsk...
Back to top	It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 114909 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible Reply #51 - Yesterday at 3:46pm Brian Ross wrote Yesterday at 3:44pm: Ah, there you are Bobby. Decided once again to poke your nose out from under your bridge? When are you going to answer my questions? Tsk, tsk, tsk... You haven't put any questions to me on this thread. forgiven namaste
Back to top	IP Logged

Brian Ross

Gold Member

Offline

Representative of me

Posts: 45314

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #52 - Yesterday at 3:53pm

Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 3:46pm:

Brian Ross wrote Yesterday at 3:44pm:

Ah, there you are Bobby. Decided once again to poke your nose out from under your bridge? When are you going to answer my questions? Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

You haven't put any questions to me on this thread. Roll Eyes

forgiven

namaste

I put the questions here, Bobby. https://www.ozpolitic.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1764903932/120#120

Back to top

It seems that I have upset a Moderator and are forbidden from using posting to the general forum now. So much for Freedom of Speech. Tsk, tsk, tsk... Roll Eyes

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 54572 Gender:	Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible Reply #53 - Yesterday at 3:54pm Brian Ross wrote Yesterday at 3:44pm: Ah, there you are Bobby. Decided once again to poke your nose out from under your bridge? When are you going to answer my questions? Tsk, tsk, tsk... When fd answers your??
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged

chimera

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 13306
Armidale
Gender: male

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #54 - Yesterday at 4:00pm

Frank wrote Yesterday at 2:53pm:

terrorists are killed every day.

terrorist /ˈtɛrərɪst/ noun
'a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
"four commercial aircraft were hijacked by terrorists'

adjective
'unlawfully using violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims'.

2025 'person in tinny going very quickly in the Gulf of Trump'

Back to top

IP Logged

chimera Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 13306 Armidale Gender:	Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible Reply #55 - Yesterday at 4:00pm .
Back to top	IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 114909
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #56 - Yesterday at 4:02pm

chimera wrote Yesterday at 4:00pm:

Frank wrote Yesterday at 2:53pm:

terrorists are killed every day.

terrorist /ˈtɛrərɪst/ noun
'a person who uses unlawful violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.
"four commercial aircraft were hijacked by terrorists'

adjective
'unlawfully using violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims'.

2025 'person in tinny going very quickly in the Gulf of Trump'

The narco-terrorists kill 350,000 US civilians every year with their poisons.

Back to top

IP Logged

chimera Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 13306 Armidale Gender:	Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible Reply #57 - Yesterday at 4:06pm Firing narco bullets at victims is terrorism. Buying drugs and snorting is suicide. Double missile murder is not very nice.
Back to top	IP Logged

Bobby. Gold Member Online Australian Politics Posts: 114909 Melbourne Gender:	Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible Reply #58 - Yesterday at 4:08pm chimera wrote Yesterday at 4:06pm: Firing narco bullets at victims is terrorism. Buying drugs and snorting is suicide. Double missile murder is not very nice. First they get them hooked on cocaine - then they put some Fentanyl in the cocaine and that kills the victim in 2 minutes.
Back to top	IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 147970
Gender: male

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #59 - Yesterday at 4:18pm

Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 3:39pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 3:25pm:

Bobby. wrote Yesterday at 3:22pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 3:12pm:

Summarily executing people in speed boats fleeing at 100mph is illegal, no matter how much they were laughing.

Hi Greggy,
did you know that the artist known as Prince was killed by Fentanyl?

How could that have happened?

Hi Bobby,

Did you know that fentanyl in the US comes from Mexico, and is smuggled into the country by US citizens?

Also, summarily executing drug traffickers is illegal.

Precursor chemicals for Fentanyl come from China and they
are turned into Fentanyl in South American countries but also including Mexico.

The precursors come from China and India.

It's then turned into fentanyl in North America - Mexico, to be precise.

It's then smuggled into the US through ports of entry by US citizens.

South America plays no part in the process of supplying fentanyl to the US, and even if they did it's still illegal to summarily execute drug traffickers and manufacturers.

Back to top

IP Logged