Australian Politics Forum - Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 54572
Gender: male

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #30 - Today at 1:08pm

ProudKangaroo wrote Today at 12:52pm:

Frank wrote Today at 12:16pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote Today at 11:06am:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 12:26pm:

How do Frank and aquascoot fall for this stuff? Seriously?

duped petrified confronting reality terrified admitting catastrophically entire misled, self‑inflicted TDS, clinging fairytales bulwark cognitive dissonanca, comforting fiction uncomfortable fact scramble flimsy collapse own weight. fragility and insecurity immeasurable precisely resonate intensely willingly reduce lackeys simping Alphas tragicomic evolution political masculinity.

You ARE your own caricature, rambling, talkative, prolix, wordy, pleonastic, long-winded, logorrheic, loquacious, voluble, windy little teapot!

Cheesy

Ah oh, caught editing quotes again Frannie... Tsk tsk you little bitch... Taking the cowards way out again.

Caught, eh? You 'caught' me, did you??
Dooo dooo dooo, eh?

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 114895
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #31 - Today at 2:19pm

Bobby. wrote Today at 10:48am:

Quote:

U.S. intelligence also spotted another larger boat in the area,
determining that the damaged boat was supposed to link up with it
to transfer the drugs onto the larger vessel.

I suppose if they play silly games they win silly prizes?

I mean - we all know about it -
if you're in a 3 engine power boat that can go 100mph
in international waters on known drug routes then a predator drone will
destroy you with a hellfire missile - with Hegseth at the controls.

How came none of those idiots knew about it?
Did they just take a risk anyway?

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 147967
Gender: male

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #32 - Today at 2:26pm

Bobby. wrote Today at 2:19pm:

Bobby. wrote Today at 10:48am:

Quote:

U.S. intelligence also spotted another larger boat in the area,
determining that the damaged boat was supposed to link up with it
to transfer the drugs onto the larger vessel.

I suppose if they play silly games they win silly prizes?

I mean - we all know about it -
if you're in a 3 engine power boat that can go 100mph
in international waters on known drug routes then a predator drone will
destroy you with a hellfire missile - with Hegseth at the controls.

How came none of those idiots knew about it?
Did they just take a risk anyway?

There's no evidence to suggest the boats were carrying drugs.

Even if they were, it's illegal to summarily execute drug traffickers.

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 54572
Gender: male

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #33 - Today at 2:38pm

greggerypeccary wrote Today at 2:26pm:

Bobby. wrote Today at 2:19pm:

Bobby. wrote Today at 10:48am:

Quote:

U.S. intelligence also spotted another larger boat in the area,
determining that the damaged boat was supposed to link up with it
to transfer the drugs onto the larger vessel.

I suppose if they play silly games they win silly prizes?

I mean - we all know about it -
if you're in a 3 engine power boat that can go 100mph
in international waters on known drug routes then a predator drone will
destroy you with a hellfire missile - with Hegseth at the controls.

How came none of those idiots knew about it?
Did they just take a risk anyway?

There's no evidence to suggest the boats were carrying drugs.

Even if they were, it's illegal to summarily execute drug traffickers.

Show us the law that says it's ilegal, Chief One Hand Fapping.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 147967
Gender: male

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #34 - Today at 2:41pm

Frank wrote Today at 2:38pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Today at 2:26pm:

Bobby. wrote Today at 2:19pm:

Bobby. wrote Today at 10:48am:

Quote:

U.S. intelligence also spotted another larger boat in the area,
determining that the damaged boat was supposed to link up with it
to transfer the drugs onto the larger vessel.

I suppose if they play silly games they win silly prizes?

I mean - we all know about it -
if you're in a 3 engine power boat that can go 100mph
in international waters on known drug routes then a predator drone will
destroy you with a hellfire missile - with Hegseth at the controls.

How came none of those idiots knew about it?
Did they just take a risk anyway?

There's no evidence to suggest the boats were carrying drugs.

Even if they were, it's illegal to summarily execute drug traffickers.

Show us the law that says it's ilegal, Chief One Hand Fapping.

Show us where it says "summary execution".

https://www.dea.gov/sites/default/files/2021-12/Trafficking%20Penalties.pdf

Back to top

IP Logged

chimera Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 13298 Armidale Gender:	Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible Reply #35 - Today at 2:43pm 'Murder on the high seas is a crime. Conspiracy to commit murder outside of the United States is a crime. And under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 118 makes murder an offense'.
Back to top	IP Logged

Frank

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 54572
Gender: male

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #36 - Today at 2:53pm

greggerypeccary wrote Today at 2:41pm:

Frank wrote Today at 2:38pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Today at 2:26pm:

Bobby. wrote Today at 2:19pm:

Bobby. wrote Today at 10:48am:

Quote:

U.S. intelligence also spotted another larger boat in the area,
determining that the damaged boat was supposed to link up with it
to transfer the drugs onto the larger vessel.

I suppose if they play silly games they win silly prizes?

I mean - we all know about it -
if you're in a 3 engine power boat that can go 100mph
in international waters on known drug routes then a predator drone will
destroy you with a hellfire missile - with Hegseth at the controls.

How came none of those idiots knew about it?
Did they just take a risk anyway?

There's no evidence to suggest the boats were carrying drugs.

Even if they were, it's illegal to summarily execute drug traffickers.

Show us the law that says it's ilegal, Chief One Hand Fapping.

Show us where it says "summary execution".

https://www.dea.gov/sites/default/files/2021-12/Trafficking%20Penalties.pdf

Not 'summary executions' Chief One Hand Fapping.

Designate terrorists are killed every day. If you do not want to be killed, don't get on a boat loaded with drugs. Not complicated.

Back to top

Estragon: I can’t go on like this.
Vladimir: That’s what you think.

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 147967
Gender: male

Re: Pisshead Pete continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #37 - Today at 2:55pm

The Military Attacks on “Drug Boats” are Not Only Ill-advised, Illegal and Immoral, They Are Summary Executions

Recent newspaper reports in the New York Times and other publications indicate that since early September of this year, the Trump Administration has authorized military strikes in the Caribbean and Pacific Ocean which have killed 61 people. There appear to have been at least 14 strikes on fishing boats which the Administration claims were carrying drugs destined for the United States. Reports suggest there were at least 3 survivors.

There is no precedent in our law enforcement for this type of summary punishment of people involved in drug importation. In the United States, if individuals hauling drugs by land or sea are intercepted, they are arrested and then given due process of law as to their guilt and the severity of any subsequent sentence. In these proceedings, the arrested party has the right to present either evidence of innocence to the charges or mitigation as to any sentence.

Drug trafficking on the high seas potentially affecting our country is handled by the United States Coast Guard and/or the United States Navy. Arrests or the seizure of drugs and other contraband by the military is dealt with as a criminal law problem where the parties are afforded due process. There is no summary punishment or execution imposed upon the parties merely because it occurs on the high seas.

Back to top

IP Logged

ProudKangaroo

Gold Member

Offline

The Sandstorm is coming
🎵Doo doo doo doo🎵

Posts: 21352
Meeanjin (Brisbane)

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #38 - Today at 2:56pm

Frank wrote Today at 1:08pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote Today at 12:52pm:

Frank wrote Today at 12:16pm:

ProudKangaroo wrote Today at 11:06am:

greggerypeccary wrote Yesterday at 12:26pm:

How do Frank and aquascoot fall for this stuff? Seriously?

duped petrified confronting reality terrified admitting catastrophically entire misled, self‑inflicted TDS, clinging fairytales bulwark cognitive dissonanca, comforting fiction uncomfortable fact scramble flimsy collapse own weight. fragility and insecurity immeasurable precisely resonate intensely willingly reduce lackeys simping Alphas tragicomic evolution political masculinity.

You ARE your own caricature, rambling, talkative, prolix, wordy, pleonastic, long-winded, logorrheic, loquacious, voluble, windy little teapot!

Cheesy

Ah oh, caught editing quotes again Frannie... Tsk tsk you little bitch... Taking the cowards way out again.

Caught, eh? You 'caught' me, did you??
Dooo dooo dooo, eh?

You modified it, again, I noticed, therefore yes, I caught you doing it. Not a difficult concept, dumb arse.

Your surrender is complete.

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 147967
Gender: male

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #39 - Today at 2:58pm

Frank wrote Today at 2:53pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Today at 2:41pm:

Frank wrote Today at 2:38pm:

greggerypeccary wrote Today at 2:26pm:

Bobby. wrote Today at 2:19pm:

Bobby. wrote Today at 10:48am:

Quote:

U.S. intelligence also spotted another larger boat in the area,
determining that the damaged boat was supposed to link up with it
to transfer the drugs onto the larger vessel.

I suppose if they play silly games they win silly prizes?

I mean - we all know about it -
if you're in a 3 engine power boat that can go 100mph
in international waters on known drug routes then a predator drone will
destroy you with a hellfire missile - with Hegseth at the controls.

How came none of those idiots knew about it?
Did they just take a risk anyway?

There's no evidence to suggest the boats were carrying drugs.

Even if they were, it's illegal to summarily execute drug traffickers.

Show us the law that says it's ilegal, Chief One Hand Fapping.

Show us where it says "summary execution".

https://www.dea.gov/sites/default/files/2021-12/Trafficking%20Penalties.pdf

Not 'summary executions' Chief One Hand Fapping.

Designate terrorists are killed every day. If you do not want to be killed, don't get on a boat loaded with drugs. Not complicated.

There is zero evidence to suggest the boats were loaded with drugs or terrorists.

And even if there was proof of drug trafficking or terrorist activity, summary executions are illegal.

Back to top

IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 114895
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #40 - Today at 2:59pm

Frank wrote Today at 2:53pm:

Not 'summary executions' Chief One Hand Fapping.

Designate terrorists are killed every day. If you do not want to be killed, don't get on a boat loaded with drugs. Not complicated.

And don't cruise in a power boat designed for racing competitions
with 3 engines that go 100mph hoping that you can outrun a predator drone that
can fly faster and for 24 hours without refueling.

Those power boats can out run any navy ship to get away with crime
but not a predator drone. Roll Eyes

Back to top

IP Logged

greggerypeccary

Gold Member

Offline

Australian Politics

Posts: 147967
Gender: male

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #41 - Today at 3:02pm

Bobby. wrote Today at 2:59pm:

Frank wrote Today at 2:53pm:

Not 'summary executions' Chief One Hand Fapping.

Designate terrorists are killed every day. If you do not want to be killed, don't get on a boat loaded with drugs. Not complicated.

And don't cruise in a power boat designed for racing competitions
with 3 engines that go 100mph hoping that you can outrun a predator drone that
can fly faster and for 24 hours without refueling.

Those power boats can out run any navy ship to get away with crime
but not a predator drone. Roll Eyes

Summarily executing people in speed boats is illegal, no matter how many engines they have.

Back to top

IP Logged

Leroy Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 3970 Gender:	Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible Reply #42 - Today at 3:06pm So it turns out greg and sadroo were talking Shute, who would have guessed.
Back to top	Trump derangement syndrome Fareed Zakaria defined the term as "hatred of President Trump so intense that it impairs people's judgment" Lets check in at 5pm on 23rd July 2025 then at 5pm on 30th July IP Logged

Bobby.

Gold Member

Online

Australian Politics

Posts: 114895
Melbourne
Gender: male

Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible
Reply #43 - Today at 3:07pm

greggerypeccary wrote Today at 3:02pm:

Bobby. wrote Today at 2:59pm:

Frank wrote Today at 2:53pm:

Not 'summary executions' Chief One Hand Fapping.

Designate terrorists are killed every day. If you do not want to be killed, don't get on a boat loaded with drugs. Not complicated.

And don't cruise in a power boat designed for racing competitions
with 3 engines that go 100mph hoping that you can outrun a predator drone that
can fly faster and for 24 hours without refueling.

Those power boats can out run any navy ship to get away with crime
but not a predator drone. Roll Eyes

Summarily executing people in speed boats is illegal, no matter how many engines they have.

You don't know the full story -
maybe they were radioed and told to stop to await a search of their boat and they took
off at 100mph laughing at the coast guards or navy?

Who knows what's going on?

Back to top

IP Logged

Frank Gold Member Offline Australian Politics Posts: 54572 Gender:	Re: Hegseth continues to defend the indefensible Reply #44 - Today at 3:09pm Hegseth declares end of US 'utopian idealism' with new military strategy Good.
Back to top	Estragon: I can’t go on like this. Vladimir: That’s what you think. IP Logged