, but it’s about half the number recommended by a former top bureaucrat.

The Victorian government will slash 1,000 public service jobs – including more than 300 executive positions – and merge several entities, as part of its response to an independent review into the sector it claims will save $4bn.

But the treasurer, Jaclyn Symes, hasn’t accepted all the recommendations of the review into the Victorian public service (VPS), led by Helen Silver and released on Thursday, which would have led to 2,068 job losses.

The government has accepted Silver’s recommendation to cut 332 executive roles across the VPS, saving $359m over four years. It has also accepted a recommendation to cap the number of VPS5 and VPS6 positions at 15%, saving $125m over four years, but this is not expected to lead to an immediate reduction in headcount.

The government estimates it will also save $50m by cutting CBD office costs and $113m on spending less on consultants and labour hire.

But the biggest savings come from overhauling the number of government agencies, boards and advisory committees.

Silver recommended 78 entities be either scrapped or consolidated and 90% of the state’s 90 advisory committees wound up – though the government has only supported the recommendation in part, committing to merging 29 entities.

Legislation will be introduced to parliament today to facilitate these changes.

Symes and the premier, Jacinta Allan, will be holding a press conference at 9am to provide more information on the changes.


https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2025/dec/04/australia-news-live-...

The problem is - of course - who will do the work of these sacked Staff?   I am more than happy to see the ”bloaters” at the upper level get the flick but what about the coalface people?   What will happen here - as it always does - is that the work now needing to be done will be contracted out and people hired at the minimum wage needed to be paid whilst the Contractor makes a profit.  It is a false economy that will eventually cost us more than if the “bloaters” were offered redundancy, those positions disestablished, and the workforce kept.

good to cull the number of executive roles, also good to see the number of 'advisors' and 'board members' cut. It's the people on the coalface they need to retain.